similar to: Slashdot: "Could Microsoft buy Red Hat?"

From: Nigel Kendrick <support-lists at petdoctors.co.uk> > Sorry if it wraps: > http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/16/1758249&tid=109&tid=163&tid=110&tid=98&tid=218 This has _nothing_ to do with Microsoft possibly buying Red Hat. People who even suggest this only expose their *0* understanding of business. Microsoft has an alliance with Sun. Why?

http://linux.slashdot.org/linux/05/02/17/1318212.shtml?tid=125&tid=109&tid=106 Microsoft Blocking Wine Users From Downloads Site ... from linux.slashdot.org IamTheRealMike writes "In January, Microsoft announced a new anti-piracy initiative called Genuine Advantage. From this summer onwards all users of Microsoft Downloads will be required to validate using either an ActiveX

Greetings all, Just a quick heads up that there is a Slashdot thread this morning on Open Source Math Software for Education, which includes references to R and Dirk's Quantian distribution (among others). The thread is at: http://ask.slashdot.org/askslashdot/04/12/13/2355258.shtml?tid=185&tid=4 The OP's query was targeted for high school to first year college age students, but as

Ask Slashdot: Is Ruby on Rails Maintainable? Posted by Cliff on Wednesday December 21, @12:51PM from the would-you-want-to-edit-the-code-later dept. kale77in asks: "I''ve become a big fan of Ruby over the past few months, but I''m not at all sure about Ruby On Rails. Automatic code generation sets of alarm bells in my mind; so that, to RoR''s promise of

Part 2 of my Rails article on ONLamp.com just made the slashdot front page! The entry, itself, is here: http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/03/04/1319242&tid=156 Curt

Hey all. Just in case someone here doesn't read Slashdot on a daily (OK, hourly, backoff! 8-) ) basis, here's a new interview with Chris Montgomery (I can only assume that it's you, Monty? I thought you were like Sting, or Madona! 8-) ) http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/08/14/1034209 Good interview, and more converts to the collective! 8-) OH, and just to update everyone,

Hey all. Just in case someone here doesn't read Slashdot on a daily (OK, hourly, backoff! 8-) ) basis, here's a new interview with Chris Montgomery (I can only assume that it's you, Monty? I thought you were like Sting, or Madona! 8-) ) http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/08/14/1034209 Good interview, and more converts to the collective! 8-) OH, and just to update everyone,

We have an article right now on the Slashdot main page: http://slashdot.org/news/08/11/04/136220.shtml -- Lino Mastrodomenico

We have an article right now on the Slashdot main page: http://slashdot.org/news/08/11/04/136220.shtml -- Lino Mastrodomenico

In case you missed it, RC2 is on slashdot.org too: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/08/13/1811241 BTW Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote on /. that RC3 should appear very soon (in a week or so)? Also, it looks like Wall Street Journal article is not available on-line (at least to non-registered persons). If someone is registered or have a paper edition, please post this article somewhere so that we

Hi folks, Just a quick hello having installed CentOS on my first box - an Acer Altos G310 (P4 2.8GHz, 768MB RAM with 70GB + 300GB storage. The 300GB unit is a SATA disk which I hope to software (hardware!?) mirror - if I'm in for any major fun mirroring a SATA drive do let me know now - I think hardware mirroring is not an option (yet!?) but I haven't checked this out completely. This

Hey, http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/13/1343236&mode=thread If anyone's interested. -- / Peter Schuller, InfiDyne Technologies HB PGP userID: 0xE9758B7D or 'Peter Schuller <peter.schuller@infidyne.com>' Key retrival: Send an E-Mail to getpgpkey@scode.org E-Mail: peter.schuller@infidyne.com Web: http://www.scode.org --- >8 ---- List archives:

Hi, As per the subject line - if I look up setting up chroot jails for SFTP over SSH2 I'm led to various Web sites and patches and also to a CentOS wiki page dated 2005, but what's the 'best' or 'correct' way to set this up for Centos 4.5 and 5? Thanks

Just in case anyone missed it. Ugh. http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/13/1343236&mode=nested --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages

I may not agree with everything they say, such as ISPConfig (I prefer webmin) but this tutorial offers a "step by step opportunity for newbies". Does this indicate that CentOS is now a "mainstream" distro? (Technically speaking its not CentOS 4.3 but CentOS 4 Update 3 but we are not into semantics). Article on Slash :- http://linux.slashdot.org/linux/06/05/01/1049254.shtml

We can't do that until we provide a reasonable way for SMB1 clients to connect, probably via a SMB1 -> SMB2 proxy based on the NTVFS file server (where we had such a prototype until very recently). It won't be perfect SMB1, but needs to be enough for basic operation. I'm quite convinced Samba and SMB1 are critical infrastructure in many places and while we may dislike SMB1 for

Apologies if you get this twice - the first one didn't seem to make it... Hi Guys, I have just replaced a faulty Max...woah, wait...this one's a Seagate... IDE hard disk but I cannot remake the software raid pair. The currently running disk is hda and I am trying to add back hdg - both are master drives on separate controllers. I have run fdisk on hdg and created the same partition

We have a server running Centos-3 with all latest updates. The server hosts 3 printers for us which are accessed by various Windows clients. About 3 months ago we noticed that, after a cups update, if you looked at the print queues in Windows they would show old jobs that had long been printed. After a further cups update this quirk went away but it's just come backs again - possibly after

For those that may have run across the story on Slashdot about this NIC, here is our statement: Recently there were a few stories published, based on a blog post by an end-user, suggesting specific network packets may cause the Intel? 82574L Gigabit Ethernet Controller to become unresponsive until corrected by a full platform power cycle. Intel was made aware of this issue in September 2012 by

To squelch the questions (related to the changing content on www.centos.org), I decided this needs to be published. The CentOS Team has been contacted by representatives of Red Hat's hired legal team regarding the use of Red Hat Trademarks on www.centos.org. (Full Email follows.) While the CentOS team feels we are using Red Hat's marks in a fair and legal manner, we have no choice