similar to: learning from the audio folks

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "learning from the audio folks"

2020 Jun 25
3
Support for ultra-high sample rates?
Isn't the FLAC encoder 'tuned' for the compression of audio data at common sample rates anyway? Does it make sense to use FLAC to compress arbitrary analog data at very high sample rates as opposed to other general purpose compression algorithms? Tor Am 25.06.2020 um 14:49 schrieb Martijn van Beurden: > Op di 2 jun. 2020 om 05:59 schreef Con Kolivas <kernel at kolivas.org
2020 Jun 25
2
Support for ultra-high sample rates?
Op do 25 jun. 2020 om 16:02 schreef Con Kolivas <kernel at kolivas.org>: > The idea is to actually use it for playback, not just storage, and > nothing else has the nice asymmetrical fast decompression with such > effective compression (wavpack supports 705/768 but is woefully slow > on decompression and poorly supported). Mostly the sample rates would > be multiples of the
2002 Oct 29
1
strange locks
Hi, I added these lines to smb.conf: kernel op locks = false op locks = false strict locking = true so I could see some locks from the unix level. It worked sorta, I see the locks for big files (but not the locks I was expecting), but for little files it shows nothing: # ./lock_list /opt/testsambashare/mattest.doc # ./lock_list /opt/testsambashare/contents.doc 0 22086 W
2020 Jun 02
0
Support for ultra-high sample rates?
Browsing the sources, it looks to me that libFLAC decoder already supports sample rates as 20-bit numbers in the STREAMINFO metadata block so up to 1,048,575 Hz if a trick is done by having in FRAME_HEADER of each frame the sample rate as "0000 : get from STREAMINFO metadata block". If explicitly given in the frame header, the maximum sample rate is 655350 Hz. However, the libFLAC
2020 Jun 25
0
Support for ultra-high sample rates?
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 23:11, Tor-Einar Jarnbjo <tor-einar at jarnbjo.name> wrote: > > Isn't the FLAC encoder 'tuned' for the compression of audio data at common sample rates anyway? Does it make sense to use FLAC to compress arbitrary analog data at very high sample rates as opposed to other general purpose compression algorithms? The idea is to actually use it for
2020 Jun 25
0
Support for ultra-high sample rates?
On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 00:37, Martijn van Beurden <mvanb1 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Op do 25 jun. 2020 om 16:02 schreef Con Kolivas <kernel at kolivas.org>: >> >> The idea is to actually use it for playback, not just storage, and >> nothing else has the nice asymmetrical fast decompression with such >> effective compression (wavpack supports 705/768 but is
2006 Dec 07
1
get errors when doing a tar backup of a windows server with linux smbclient
Hello all, We have a script that does a nightly backup of a windows server to a linux fileserver. The linux system uses smbclient to make a tarball of the share. I get this error when running smbclient: Domain=[OURSERVER] OS=[Windows 5.0] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager] tar: dumped 56781 files and directories Total bytes written: 9800680960 write_data: write failure. Error = Connection
2015 May 11
2
appdynamics php agent prevented by SELinux
Hey guys, I've got another C7 problem I was hoping to solve. I installed appdynamics-php-agent-4.0.5.0-1.x86_64 on a C7.1 host. It's failing to communicate with it's controller on another host. And this is the interesting part. Whether or not I have SELinux enabled, I have apache reporting SELinux problems. [root at web1:~] #getenforce Permissive May 10 20:47:56 web1 python[25735]:
2005 Nov 07
3
R thread safe
Dear R-dev, I would like to accelerate my R computation by using parallel OpenMP compilers (e.g from Pathscale) on a 2-processor AMD server and I would like to know whether R is a tread safe library. The main kernel of the OpenMP parallelization is a C SEXP function that performs the computational routine in parallel with: ******************* SEXP example(SEXP list, SEXP expr, SEXP rho) {
2013 Nov 29
1
Self heal problem
Hi, I have a glusterfs volume replicated on three nodes. I am planing to use the volume as storage for vMware ESXi machines using NFS. The reason for using tree nodes is to be able to configure Quorum and avoid split-brains. However, during my initial testing when intentionally and gracefully restart the node "ned", a split-brain/self-heal error occurred. The log on "todd"
2014 Apr 02
0
special handling of row.names
Hello, I think there is an inconsistency in the handling of the compact form of the row.names attributes. When n is the number of rows of a data.frame, the compact form is c(NA_integer_,-n), as in: > d <- data.frame(x=1:10) > .Internal(inspect(d)) @104f174a8 19 VECSXP g0c1 [OBJ,NAM(2),ATT] (len=1, tl=0) @103a7dc60 13 INTSXP g0c4 [] (len=10, tl=0) 1,2,3,4,5,... ATTRIB: @104959380
2019 Jul 18
0
ALTREP wrappers and factors
Hi Kylie, For your question, I don't think a wrapper can completely solve your problem. The duplication occurs since your variable y has more than 1 reference number( Please see highlighted), so even you have a wrapper, any changes on the value of the wrapper still can trigger the duplication. > .Internal(inspect(y)) > @7fb0ce78c0f0 13 INTSXP g0c0 *[NAM(7)]* matter vector (mode=3,
2004 Jul 16
3
PSTN/phone/FXO/FXS cabling issue
I just received a Wildcard TDM400P by FedEx yesterday. I noticed that the FXO/FXS modules use connectors similar to Ethernet. Now, i want to connect the TDM400P to the PSTN connector in the wall, and also to a regular analog phone. Both the PSTN conn and the phone use smaller connectors, typical for analog phones. I searched the "official" docs and the Wiki, there's good
2016 May 20
2
identical on closures
Specifically, the srcfile attribute of the srcref attribute of the two instances of the functions contain different environments, AFAICT. Environments are compared only by exact pointer, so this forces return FALSE. Snippets from .Internal(inspect(x)) and .Internal(inspect(y)): @cca008 03 CLOSXP g0c0 [MARK,NAM(2),ATT] FORMALS: @604b58 00 NILSXP g0c0 [MARK,NAM(2)] BODY: @cc9650 06 LANGSXP
2015 Apr 14
2
state of IPSec VPN on CentOS 7: Openswan, strongSwan, RPM packages
On 2015-04-14 11:25, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 04/14/2015 11:07 AM, Florin Andrei wrote: >> I looked in the yum repositories for CentOS 7 and I noticed that there >> are no packages for any of the major open source IPSec VPN apps - >> Openswan, strongSwan, etc. I'm pretty sure CentOS 6 had Openswan >> packages. > > libreswan replaced openswan, and is
2007 Oct 04
7
rolling your own kernel - guidelines?
Let's say I want to use a much newer kernel - even one from the future, such as the upcoming 2.6.24. :-) What would y'all smart folks do in this case, in order to avoid any possible nasty consequences? Would you import the config file from the original CentOS5 kernel into the new kernel, and let the kernel deal with the differences? I.e. have the old configuration as some sort of
2007 Mar 20
4
SATA RAID card recommendation?
I need a SATA RAID PCI card that works well with CentOS and is fully supported. Mandatory features: - works with the drivers already in the kernel, no additional drivers - can do RAID 0, 1 and 5 - hotswap - allows to monitor the status of the array and of each individual drive via a script (ideally run from cron) - works with very large SATA drives Nice to have features but not mandatory: -
2004 Aug 04
4
FCC Rules VoIP Must Be Tappable
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/08/04/2212251&tid=158&tid=95&tid=103 Probably some of you already saw this. Now, beyond discussions regarding the legitimacy of such a ruling (whether they have the legal, moral or whatever right to enforce it), there's the technical aspect. Suppose i provide VoIP services using Asterisk, and i fall under the incidence of the FCC ruling
2010 Jul 08
4
Dell OpenManage
Hi Everyone, I have a Xen host (Xen 3.4.2) which is running CentOS 5.5 Dom0. I wish to install Dell OpenManage to get a nice web interface with hardware status. Do I need to do anything special to get this working on a Xen host? Or does it work out of the box? The reason why I''m asking, instead of trying, is that my server is currently on its way to a colo, and I won''t have
2002 Feb 25
3
PATCH: Samba/Win2K renaming bug
Hi there. I'm running Samba 2.2.3a on RedHat 7.1 + kernel 2.4.17. My girlfriend's laptop is running Windows 2000 + service pack 2. She has about a thousand MP3s stored on a Samba share on my RedHat machine. We were finding that she couldn't rename any MP3s on the Samba share: she would always get a sharing violation. After a day of reading Samba logs at debug 10 (_such_ fun [ ;)