similar to: Asterisk RPMS Updated (0.9.0 for RH73,8,9 and FC1)

Neo: What are you trying to tell me? That I can dodge bullets? Morpheus: No, Neo. I'm trying to tell you that when you're ready, you won't have to. There have been over 500 downloads of the RedHat Asterisk RPMS since they were released 2 weeks ago, and I have received many comments to improve them. After some late night hacking this weekend, I have dropped 0.7.1 release 4 RPMS at

Hello, Straight from the floor of Astricon 2004, I am happy to release my updated Asterisk 1.0 RPMS for RedHat 7.3 and RedHat 9.0 platform. Current Release --------------- asterisk-1.0-0 libpri-1.0-0 zaptel-1.0-0 kernel-module-zaptel-1.0-0 RedHat 7.3 ---------- ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh73/RPMS/ ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh73/SRPMS/ RedHat 9.0 ----------

Hello all, It's my birthday today, so as my present I would like everyone possible to download and test my updated set of RPMS for Asterisk 0.7.1. By popular request, I installed and built a set of RPMS for RedHat 9.0, and in the process fixed a bunch of issues from the initial build. I have also updated and will be maintaining a page on the Asterisk Wiki located at:

Hello all, Per my last message to the list, and my promise to the Developers that I'd create RPMS if they released 0.7.0, I would like to announce the availability of experimental RPMS for Asterisk release 0.7.1. These are targeted at RedHat 7.3 systems, running the latest Kernel release (2.4.20-28.7). As the RPMS mature and people submit comments, changes, updates and patches, I will

Hello, Please be conscious of Digium's bandwidth and use a Mirror when downloading 1.0. I have mirrored the tarballs at: ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/ Direct links: ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/asterisk-1.0.0.tar.gz ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/asterisk-sounds-1.0.0.tar.gz ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/libpri-1.0.0.tar.gz -- Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc.

I have made my first run at building FC1 and FC2 rpms for Asterisk 1.0.0. These are based off of Greg's spec files which a few minor changes. Source and binary RPMs are available at: ftp://asterisk.purplehat.net/pub/asterisk/ Please report any problems with these files to myself and not Greg as he has nothing to do with these builds. :) Sorry these took so long; it was a wild week at

Hello all, Hot on the announcement this morning by Mark, I have updated and rebuilt new Asterisk RPMS for RedHat 7.3, 8, 9 and Fedora Core 1. Please feel free to install these and beat them up. The usual disclaimer applies.. These haven't been tested, not reccomended for production use, don't bug Digium for support of these, blah blah blah.... You can find the updated RPMS and Source

Hello, On Saturday, Oct 2nd 2004, I did a 45 minute presentation on Asterisk to the Ohio Linuxfest. Roughly 350 people attended, and I think I spoke with nearly all of them at some time during the day. N2Net had an Asterisk PBX running on a Laptop w/ a pair of SNOM 200 Phones setup for people to play with. When all was said and done, nearly 800 incoming/outgoing calls were made through the

Hello, I'm looking at building a couple new PRI Gateway boxes using TE405P cards, and was wondering if anyone has had any experiences (good or bad) with the Intel SE7210TP1_E motherboards from Intel. General Technics builds some really nice (and cost effective) 1U servers based on the board: Server: http://www.gtweb.net/gt637.html Specs:

Howdy, I just did an "apt-get dist-upgrade" on my Debian unstable box, and noticed that the Asterisk version appears to be 1.0-1 in the unstable tree. I KNOW that 1.0 hasn't been released yet, so I am wondering who is responsible for the Debian packages? This will be VERY VERY confusing for people and it should be corrected ASAP. -rw-rw-r-- 1 1176 1176 1189696 Jun 7

Dear All, I have server with a 160G disk with one partition /dev/hde1. The PC had FC1 and everything was working fine. I decided to do an upgrade to FC4. Now I can no longer mount that partition. I don't think anything happened to the file system, but changes in kernel and modules due to the upgrade is now making it inaccessible. I tried: mk2fs -n /dev/hde1 got a list of

[root at fc1-devel tmp]# rpmbuild -ta dovecot-1.0-test19.tar.gz error: line 7: Illegal char '-' in version: Version: 1.0-test19 Seems to be an error into the .spec file I am not sure. I will check it. Did anyone get this problem in the past? Thanks.

Hi, I dont know if this is a dovecot problem, or the rpm build, me, or my computer ;) Was wondering if anyone else has been having problems using the 0.99.12-1.1.fc1.rf release from http://dag.wieers.com/packages/dovecot/ My specific problem is this. 1. Dovecot starts 2. You can login using telnet 3. You can issue a select inbox but nothing seems to happen By this stage dovecot is spiraling

I've spent the morning looking at making some RPMs for Fedora Core 1 and run into a problem with GSSAPI. Basically the default install of Fedora doesn't come with the necessary gssapi code to build the RPMs by default (i.e. you need to say %define kerberos5 0 in openssh.spec). Since Fedora is going to fork off from RedHat I was going to create a set of patches to make a

Hi! I have a curious problem. I updated my Fedora Core 1 box yesterday from samba-3.0.2 to samba-3.0.6. All the packages that were suggested by yum. I have the box join an NT4 Domain, and while yesterday before the update a smbstatus would list the users as CENTRUM+Username (CENTRUM is my NT Domain) today it refuses to do so, and any shares apart from the public ones are not available any

good evening all, i upgraded my last samba 2.2.7a (dog2) this afternoon and have run into problems. first, the setup: windows 2000 clients three sites on three seperate subnets connected by t1 through routers. each site has a samba server that authenticates the users on its subnet. the workgroup name for each server is dognet. /etc/passwd, /etc/group, and smbpasswd are synced up manually.

Hi I wish to install asterisk 1.2 (the latest tar.gz from the site ....not the CVS version) on an HP box with a TE110P (single port E1/T1) My question is which OS would be preferred in this configuration Fedora Core 1 or Fedora Core 3, and are there any install guides out there that are recent enough for asterisk 1.2 I am also open to suggestions for other Operating Systems if any of you feel

Hello all, I just updated my development Asterisk box today and am noticing weird behaviour in the CLI. Whenever I hit "tab" the CLI shows me the list of commands, but the output is garbled. See below. I'm running the v1.0_stable code, checked out about 2 hours ago. asterisk*CLI> show version Asterisk CVS-03/30/04-14:34:01 built by root@asterisk.n2net.net on a i686 running

Hello, I've got a mixture of SPIP 300 and 500 phones in production for various clients. I've got the XML settings configured for local conferencing, but I'm not seeing the expected behavior from the phone when I attempt to conference two calls together. According to the manual, while talking to the first party, you simply hit Conference, dial the second party and then Conference

Hello, Anyone using the 1.0.4.55 firmware release with any success? I have had my Budgetone running 1.0.4.50 for about a month and a half now with no problems whatsoever, and I am a little leary about upgrading. -- Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place!