similar to: RE: PRI, multi D channels and conventional PBXs (brian)

Hi all OK this may sound like a good one but maybe someone can tell me. Simple context is - I want to unplug my existing conventional PBX from the Telco and place * with it's TE410P in between. Now the difficult part, the existing connection is E1 PRI (Q.931) with 6 B-channels. I need to be able to trigger a D-channel to the old PBX and a D-Channel to the Telco (Not BT!). Next I can put

Several people have asked about integrating asterisk in a company that currently has a PBX installed. Considering the capital outlay for most PBXs, depending on the model and age of the system, most companies do not want to look at replacement. So, what should one look at in a PBX in order to integrate asterisk into a pre-existing PBX? I have read of some systems with T1 interfaces, but what

The networkmag@cmp.com appears to be broken. I dug around the magazine contacts and found Doug Allen, senior editor, you can send comments to dallen2@cmp.com . I didn't get a bounce back from that e-mail so I assume it made it to the editor. JR

* Brethren, It's a sad day in our community. Please join me in a moment of silence for the death of responsible journalism. Silence.....................good enough. This article goes on to tell about Pingtel's announcement of forming the "first open source community aimed at creating SIP based servers".

Greetings to all, I am getting the following error on my PRI-connected Asterisk box, and am just wondering if anyone else has seen this, and if so how they solved it. Jan 18 10:10:23 NOTICE[6070]: chan_zap.c:7428 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 Jan 18 10:10:24 NOTICE[6070]: chan_zap.c:7428 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary

Now that's quite interesting - yes, this is a two way span. I thought that the D-channel negotiation that happens before the B-channel is set up would have implicitly avoid the glare condition through signalling the intent-to-use to the resource to the remote end (a-la E&M wink start). So what seems to be happening in my case is my CPE is set for a 'Descending' b channel sequence

Insightful AG and Seminar for Statistics of ETH Z?rich present: Statistical Data Mining by PROF. BRIAN D. RIPLEY click here for all details: http://www.insightful.com/services/training/datamining_by_Ripley.asp *Zuerich April 3/4* Data Mining has become popular in science, engineering and in traditionally data-rich industries such as banking, insurance and market research. There are emerging

Could some out there with a PRI check and see if this problem shows up on your system? The test is to dial a number routed to * via a PRI where there is no match in the dial plan for the dialed number. Asterisk will reject the call, but "show zap channels" still shows the channel assigned to the number that was dialed under the extensions column. The channel WILL answer another call,

Hi guys, We are experiencing a problem with a T1 PRI connection. After trying a number of variations in the configuration files, the behavior is always the same: no B channels come up and the D channel doesn't appear to be working well. We can see there are AT&T Maintenance messages being exchanged by asterisk and the provider, CONNECT and CONNECT ACKNOWLEDGE, but that doesn't

Hello Is there a straightforward way of getting a vector containing the minimum (or maximum) value of each row of a matrix? Thanks Barth PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION This transmittal and any attachments may contain PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL information and is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the designated recipient, or an employee or agent authorized to

-- Executing unixODBCput("SIP/10-cc1b", "BLAH/blah=bkw") in new stack -- unixodbcput: family=BLAH, key=blah, value=bkw -- Executing unixODBCput("SIP/10-cc1b", "BLAH/blah=bk2") in new stack -- unixodbcput: family=BLAH, key=blah, value=bk2 -- Executing unixODBCget("SIP/10-cc1b", "testingget=BLAH/blah") in new stack -- unixodbcget:

----- Original Message ----- From: <asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com> To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 7:55 PM Subject: Asterisk-Users digest, Vol 1 #1279 - 16 msgs > Send Asterisk-Users mailing list submissions to > asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >

Dear list I am interested n developing a graph using plot() and text() commands in which several text strings will be placed within the plot area I would like some way to get the size (width and height), either in pixels or using the plot's coordinate system, of text strings, based on the typeface/font size assigned for writing text in the plot area. Is therre function that can do this? I

I've had a dedicated box running for ages in my LAN without any kind of problems. Ssh has been installed and useable till tomorrow when a problem pop up. KERNEL: 2.6.5 no server or client settings have been changed. I can ping and nmap the host without any kind of problems. Bellow I'll paste a verbosed ssh try. bkw at tellus ~ $ ssh -vvv neptune OpenSSH_3.8p1, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0,

I se what you are talking about I an able to reproduce!!! However your PRI may be in a Round-Robin picking order, that would cycle through all of the channels until it reaches an end and then it repeats. I set our PRI to first available hunting instead of RR and it will use the same channel over and over again regardless if the call exists. If anything it's a feature!!! Unassigned DID will

Hi, I'm buying an interface for my Toshiba DKT424 to connect to *. Initially it is a trial to route internal calls over our wan. Think of it as a tie trunk between 2 pbxs. I expect to get PRI from the telco our layout will be like this: telco_T1_PRI to * to various PBX or TDM or IAX to * to other pbxs My question is, is there benefits to connecting with PRI over a standard T1 within my

Dear all I am trying to use the cov function in the stats library. I have no problem using this function from the console. However, in my R script I received a "function not found" message. Then I called stats::cov(...) and received an error message that the function was not exported. Then I tried stats:::cov (three colons) and received the error Error in get(name, envir =

Hi all. I have this problem with my Digium 2E1 card and PRI, for hours It works well, with some meesages... [Aug 10 09:20:31] NOTICE[32270] chan_dahdi.c: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 1 But PRI continue up....hours later... PRI go down. I thought the problem was in the telco, but the strange thing is that I have a loop cable in the second E1 and when I scan both E1

On 29/12/14 18:20, support at remsnet.de wrote: > Dear Roland, > > and here we have one reasons / prove regarding Debian and current Samba BIND DLZ issues : > http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/b/bind9/bind9_9.8.4.dfsg.P1-6+nmu2+deb7u3_changelog > MSG >> " * disable dlz until we get a patch to make it build again" > > Well Debian

But it does indicated that a variable is staying assigned that should not be, which could have other impact over time??? The behavior is very different for c call where there is a dialplan match for the dialed number, when the call completes the channel extension variable is cleared. If you do not mind please ad a bug note that you experienced the same thing! The bug marshals think I am nuts.