similar to: canreinvite and codec negotations...

I've gotten canreinvite=yes to work with a sip device behind NAT!! You *MUST* port forward the SIPPort to in your gateway router to your phone. This is a MUST. Okay, now on to my problem.. I have people who will be using ulaw, and I have people who will be using g729.. I want to set it up so that canreinivte will work.. I have a single cisco gateway.. Asterisks isn't handling the

I'm stuck running a old copy of asterisk because something strange is going on in later versions of the CVS.. When I call in from a PSTN into my cisco 2610XM gateway which then routes the call to my asterisk box via sip.. Asterisk can no longer process DTMF tones generated by the calling party. This affects DISA, prompts and menus.. Has anyone else had this problem?? and use.. I DO have

The lastest CVS's versions (both stable and head), the 'r' option in app_dial doesn't work with SIP and Re-invites. I've heard reports that it's not working with IAX2 either.. I'm using Cisco gateway and cisco ATA's and I am doing re-invites, and it's worked up till this point.. What's going on? Thanks, Billy

I've been getting this Warning message for a while now.. Apr 27 13:56:45 WARNING[1142106560]: chan_sip.c:5775 sipsock_read: Recv error: Resource temporarily unavailable and from what I can tell, this warning coinsides with a dropped call.. I'm running Cisco Gateways with Cisco ATA's (running 3.1 firmware) and I am doing Re-invites with NAT & STUN (and in some cases RTP aware

I'm new to Asterisk, but, Managed to get it working for outound calls from my ATA --> Asterisk --> Cisco 2620 using SIP. However, I'm having problems with Inbound calls from the Cisco.. Cisco 2620 --> Asterisk --> ATA .. In fact, voice mail won't even work.. This is a snippet of what I'm getting when I try to call the ATA -- Executing

Dear User, Anybody could dial these sip uri : sip:info@nxs.yi.org (french) sip:music@nxs.yi.org (music 60s) sip:support@nxs.yi.org (french) Thanks for help ___________________________________________________________________________ Nouveau : t?l?phonez moins cher avec Yahoo! Messenger ! D?couvez les tarifs exceptionnels pour appeler la France et l'international. T?l?chargez sur

Tzafrir, How did you set sip:tzafrir@local.xorcom.com I use ser----asterisk look at my sip.conf and extensions.conf Regards Harry //////////////////////////////////////////////////// [general] context=sip realm=nxs.yi.org bindport=5050 bindaddr=nxs.yi.org srvlookup=yes tos=lowdelay maxexpirey=3600 defaultexpirey=1000 allow=all musicclass=default language=fr insecure=very allowguest=yes

Tzafrir, How did you set sip:tzafrir@local.xorcom.com I use ser----asterisk look at my sip.conf and extensions.conf Regards Harry //////////////////////////////////////////////////// [general] context=sip realm=nxs.yi.org bindport=5050 bindaddr=nxs.yi.org srvlookup=yes tos=lowdelay maxexpirey=3600 defaultexpirey=1000 allow=all musicclass=default language=fr insecure=very allowguest=yes

Hello, I posted a lot of mails may be asterisk is not able to accept sip calls from internet !? My english is not fluent i try my best ! My problem I use ser+asterisk. For local calls there are no problem (PSTN or IP) Now i wish to receive calls from other internet domain but asterisk ask for authentication 407. IS IT possible to Disable authentication for incoming calls to my sip uri ?

On Friday 13 June 2008 22:46:41 Mark McLoughlin wrote: > lguest (in rusty's use-tun-ringfd patch) assumes that the > guest has updated its feature bits before setting its status > to VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK. > > That's pretty reasonable, so let's make it so. Applied. That's a bug, I'll send to Linus immediately (I screwed up in the feature changes which are

From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc at redhat.com> lguest (in rusty's use-tun-ringfd patch) assumes that the guest has updated its feature bits before setting its status to VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK. That's pretty reasonable, so let's make it so. Signed-off-by: Mark McLoughlin <markmc at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> ---

On Friday 13 June 2008 22:46:41 Mark McLoughlin wrote: > lguest (in rusty's use-tun-ringfd patch) assumes that the > guest has updated its feature bits before setting its status > to VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK. > > That's pretty reasonable, so let's make it so. Applied. That's a bug, I'll send to Linus immediately (I screwed up in the feature changes which are

From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc at redhat.com> lguest (in rusty's use-tun-ringfd patch) assumes that the guest has updated its feature bits before setting its status to VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK. That's pretty reasonable, so let's make it so. Signed-off-by: Mark McLoughlin <markmc at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> ---

Hi all, I've compiled 3.0.7 on a test box which also has an LDAP server running on it. This is the first time for me trying to use Samba with LDAP. I copied the IdealX scripts into /usr/local/sbin and edited the _config.pm file. It is attached at the bottom, stripped of comments. I then edited my smb.conf to the effect of the following: passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://localhost ldap

Hi, I am trying to set up a linux box with 5 N/W cards of which one is 10/100/1000T and the others are 10/100T. I connected all the cards and turned on the machine. I wanted to force eth0 to be the 1000T cards but the cards get allotted eth0 to eth4 randomly. Is there some way wherein I can force my 1000T card to be eth0. Also I want to turn off auto negotation & flow control on the 1000T

Hello G?tz, could you do a closer look at your smbd (maybe with truss or strace) to see what exactly happens? or maybe it would be enough to watch traffic between your client and server (and traffic between your server and nameserver, domaincotroler (if involved)) best regards, chris -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: samba-bounces+christian.masopust=siemens.com@lists.samba.org

When I try to connect to a Windows share I am getting the following message: "cli_negprot: SMB signing is mandatory and we have disabled it. 2644: protocol negotation failed. SMB connection failed." How do cure this problem? Is there a list of error messages for samba? Any help would be very gratefully received. Victor Warner

A while ago our institute was approached by a large company, say XXX, who asked whether we would like to become an Xxx development center, as we are active in the same area. After some negotation we did, believing there will be mutual benefits. Some time later, after putting up the Xxx development center logo on the institute home page, my feeling grew that we are also, and probably to a larger

We have discovered a security flaw with potential minor impact in libnbd. Lifecycle --------- Reported: 2023-07-14 Fixed: 2023-07-15 Published: 2023-07-17 This was not deemed severe enough to warrant a CVE: even though a malicious server can cause libnbd to crash in a specific scenario, it requires the client to have first invoked non-default setup, typically used only during integration

Hello, My name is Fermín Galán and I''m currently working with IPSec tunnels. Recently, I was setting a IPSec tunnelling sample scenario (maybe the simplest one :), where I observed some strange behaviour that I like to describe in the list, just in the case somebody knows what can be the cause, please. The scenario involves four hosts configured in the following way: