similar to: Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released

Hello all, It's my birthday today, so as my present I would like everyone possible to download and test my updated set of RPMS for Asterisk 0.7.1. By popular request, I installed and built a set of RPMS for RedHat 9.0, and in the process fixed a bunch of issues from the initial build. I have also updated and will be maintaining a page on the Asterisk Wiki located at:

Hello all, Hot on the announcement this morning by Mark, I have updated and rebuilt new Asterisk RPMS for RedHat 7.3, 8, 9 and Fedora Core 1. Please feel free to install these and beat them up. The usual disclaimer applies.. These haven't been tested, not reccomended for production use, don't bug Digium for support of these, blah blah blah.... You can find the updated RPMS and Source

Neo: What are you trying to tell me? That I can dodge bullets? Morpheus: No, Neo. I'm trying to tell you that when you're ready, you won't have to. There have been over 500 downloads of the RedHat Asterisk RPMS since they were released 2 weeks ago, and I have received many comments to improve them. After some late night hacking this weekend, I have dropped 0.7.1 release 4 RPMS at

Hello, Straight from the floor of Astricon 2004, I am happy to release my updated Asterisk 1.0 RPMS for RedHat 7.3 and RedHat 9.0 platform. Current Release --------------- asterisk-1.0-0 libpri-1.0-0 zaptel-1.0-0 kernel-module-zaptel-1.0-0 RedHat 7.3 ---------- ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh73/RPMS/ ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/rh73/SRPMS/ RedHat 9.0 ----------

Hello, Please be conscious of Digium's bandwidth and use a Mirror when downloading 1.0. I have mirrored the tarballs at: ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/ Direct links: ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/asterisk-1.0.0.tar.gz ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/asterisk-sounds-1.0.0.tar.gz ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/libpri-1.0.0.tar.gz -- Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc.

Hello, I'm looking at building a couple new PRI Gateway boxes using TE405P cards, and was wondering if anyone has had any experiences (good or bad) with the Intel SE7210TP1_E motherboards from Intel. General Technics builds some really nice (and cost effective) 1U servers based on the board: Server: http://www.gtweb.net/gt637.html Specs:

You probably know this already, but the following notice appeared to bugtraq. As a side note the protocol on bugtraq seems to be designed to make a fix available before the announcement by providing one yourself or giving the maintainer a week's advance warning (M$ gets a lot longer warning and *still* fails to fix the bugs before bugtraq knows). Having said that M$ insists on allowing me

Hello, At one of our locations, we have started to see Polycom 501s (running 1.6.7 firmware) randomly reboot. We have taken packet traces of the phones to determine if there is something odd in the Layer 2 or 3 of the network that might cause it, and have not seen anything strange. There are no errors on the ports. This appears to be affecting POE powered as well as AC powered phones. The Polycom

Howdy, I just did an "apt-get dist-upgrade" on my Debian unstable box, and noticed that the Asterisk version appears to be 1.0-1 in the unstable tree. I KNOW that 1.0 hasn't been released yet, so I am wondering who is responsible for the Debian packages? This will be VERY VERY confusing for people and it should be corrected ASAP. -rw-rw-r-- 1 1176 1176 1189696 Jun 7

There are new RPMS released for nx and freenx in the CentOS-4 and CentOS-5 Extras repository. I normally do not announce that here, as those can easily be obtained on a normal "yum upgrade/update", however in this case there are special actions required *_IF_* you have the x86_64 architecture for either CentOS-4 or CentOS-5 with the current versions of nx and freenx installed. The

I'm trying to switch to using rsync for updating a huge software library containing binaries, text files, symlinks, and so on. We've been using something homegrown which I'm not that happy with - it's a perl script that systems cp and chmod and such. The problem I'm seeing is: target computer: directories ctime-5 and ctime-5b3 are distinct directories source computer:

Hello. I know that it is recommended to run smbd as a standalone daemon and to avoid inetd. Can you please tell me why inetd is discouraged and what problems it imposes? Also, I have one user who is having problems accessing her personal files on a MacOSX 10.3.2 via smb. Any ideas what may be causing it? Judy Lin NACS-DCS

Asterisk 0.7.1 has been released fixing a few minor bugs. Thanks again to the bug marshalls, especially Malcolm and bkw. Mark

Hello all, I spent a little time in the wilderness and when I came back to civilization, I found out that new Libpri, Zaptel and Asterisk archives were available on ftp.digium.com. As a result, I've updated my Asterisk RPMS for RedHat and made them available for public consumption. Because of several issues with Fedora Core 2 and the 2.6 kernel, I am going to wait before I even start

Hi - I think I might have seen this problem on the list before, so I'm sorry if this is a duplicate, but I couldn't find it when searching through the archive.... I'm just setting up a new machine with asterisk. It's a RH9 box, and I've tried the RC2 tarball, the 1.0 CVS and the 1.0 RPM's from nacs.net (thanks). My config is basically the sample barebones sip setup

Hi everyone, Just wanted to let you know that 0.8.0 is out. You can get it from the usual place and here's the small notes that go with it: "CELT 0.8.0 brings quality improvements for high bit-rates and for transients in general. It also adds the possibility of changing the frame size dynamically, which requires a minor change in the API. At last, the new PLC algorithm from 0.7.1 is

Im intending use Ext3 file system in my web farm. Im using RedHat 6.2 (kernel 2.2.16-3) and Turbo Linux Cluster Server 6.0. I have NO SUCCESS in path my own kernel. I downloaded the following ext3 packages: ext3-0.0.2f.tar.gz (linux-2.2.16-3.kdb.diff , linux-2.2.16-3.ext3.diff ) e2fsprogs-1.20-0.WIP.i386.rpm e2fsprogs-1.20-0.WIP.src.rpm e2fsprogs-1.20-0ext3.i386.rpm

I''m trying to use button_to and have it use an image in place of the submit button. I had figured it would work the same as link_to like so: button_to(image_tag("editicon", :size => "16x16", :border => 0), :action => ''edit'', :id => person.id) but this instead displays the image code as the button name. Surely there is a simple way to

On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Gregory Boehnlein <damin at nacs.net> wrote: > Hello, > Is anyone running Asterisk 1.4 w/ RFC2833 to Level3's SONUS network? > We are unable to get reliable RFC 2833 DTMF working, and have instead had to > use G711ULAW w/ INBAND DTMF to get around the issue. Looks like an issue on > the SONUS side. > > Anyone else have this

> Intel: > rpm -Uvh ftp://ftp.redhat.com/updates/4.0/i386/util-linux-2.5-29.i386.rpm > > Alpha: > rpm -Uvh ftp://ftp.redhat.com/updates/4.0/axp/util-linux-2.5-29.axp.rpm > > SPARC: > rpm -Uvh ftp://ftp.redhat.com/updates/4.0/sparc/util-linux-2.5-29.sparc.rpm > > All of these packages have been signed with Red Hat''s PGP key. But when you do this,