similar to: How to bind RTP when IP alias are configured

> Hi Folks, > > I have a situation where my Colo insists on a particular IP setup > for my * server box. They allocate two blocks of IPs to my colo > server. One set as my own (ex 20.20.20.20.4/30 - 4 ips) and the > other as a transit lan (es 10.10.10.0/29). These are all public > IP addresses and there is no NAT involved in. > > So essentially I have to set-up IP

Today my pbx stopped responding to my sip phones.. looking into the log, here what I got: Jun 23 15:50:05 WARNING[7176]: File rtp.c, Line 586 (ast_rtp_new): Unable to allocate socket: Too many open files Jun 23 15:50:05 WARNING[7176]: File chan_sip.c, Line 1308 (sip_alloc): Unable to create RTP session: Too many open files Jun 23 15:50:05 WARNING[7176]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4655

I have a server located remotely running CentOS 5.x. I need to have two IP's on the same interface. So I have this: /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=none BROADCAST=69.x.x.199 HWADDR=00:x:x:x:c6:10 IPADDR=69.x.x.194 NETMASK=255.255.255.248 NETWORK=69.x.x.192 ONBOOT=yes GATEWAY=69.x.x.193 TYPE=Ethernet So I added this:

I have an error in my dmesg system log about hpet not correctly enabling: hpet_acpi_add: no address or irqs in _CRS The same kernel without Xen enables it fine: hpet0: at MMIO 0xfed00000 (virtual 0xffffffffff5fe000), IRQs 2, 8, 31 hpet0: 3 32-bit timers, 25000000 Hz hpet_resources: 0xfed00000 is busy Do I have to pass an additional boot option? (ACPI is already enabled) or is there

In my setup, which is FreeBSD, using pjsip 2.5.5 as sip backend I am observing a regression when testing the latest Release Candidate. Any calls get refused and the following error shown on console: [Nov 22 10:49:26] WARNING[101105]: res_rtp_asterisk.c:2400 int create_new_socket(const char *, int): Unable to allocate RTP socket: Protocol not supported [Nov 22 10:49:26] WARNING[101105]:

My future plan currently looks like this for my VPS hosting solution, so any feedback would be appreciated: Each Node: Dell R210 Intel X3430 Quad Core 8GB RAM Intel PT 1Gbps Server Dual Port NIC using linux "bonding" Small pair of HDDs for OS (Probably in RAID1) Each node will run about 10 - 15 customer guests Storage Server: Some Intel Quad Core Chip 2GB RAM (Maybe more?) LSI

Hello All, Does anyone know what is the current status of RHEL 5.2 x86_64 with respect to the maximum amount of RAM detected by the Xen 64 bit kernel (the one that shipped with Red Hat distribution ) In the following link https://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-5-manual/en-US/RHEL510/Virtualization_Guide/ch-virt-hw-support.html it states that 32GB of RAM is the maximum amount of

Hi all, i''m having a somewhat stupid problem I can''t get rid of. we''ve a server that accepts incoming world connections from a load balancer (10.10.10.4) to port 80, and we still want to serve incoming ssh/http from the firewall (10.10.10.1) routed to this host (10.10.10.90) and their reply packets of cause shall be send out through the firewall. unfortunately, both

Hello list; I´ve updated my windows 2k3 GPLPV drivers from 0.9.9 to 0.9.12-pre13. But now, i have two xen block devices; (of course, one of them is not working and is marked with the yellow exclamation). How can i fix it, or how can i uninstall the GPLPV drivers in order to make a clean install? Thanks Juan Pablo _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

My current route for a box shows this: route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 24.123.23.168 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.248 U 0 0 0 eth2 74.223.8.176 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U 0 0 0 eth1 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 169.254.0.0

Hi, I am sucesfully running 2.6.30 xenified kernel: Machine DELL Optiplex 960 CPU intel E8400 8GB RAM Debian lenny 5.0 x64 Xen 3.4.1 rc11 + kernel 2.6.30.2 xenified thanks to howto from bderzhavets: http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/07/07/building-xenified-2-6-30-1-kernel-via-xen-patches-2-6-30-2-tar-bz2/ So far running ok. 1) I am not able to resolve issue while booting xenified

I just upgraded to RC1 from a two-three month old CVS , and noticed that during IAX2 calls to my service provider there are periods (usually less than 10 seconds long, minutes apart) during which the caller can not hear me, but I can hear the caller fine. Inter-office calls (SIP-to-SIP) does not appear to have this issue. Has any other users experienced this? Marcus Adolfsson TreoCentral

Hi Folks, have a question, on bandwidth. I want to run an asterisk server SIP to H323, g729. Calls arrive on sip/iax go to IVR get authenticated and egress through h323. So G729 license is only used during IVR and then it is pass through. I am collocating this server. Colo offer a monthly bandwidth quota. Lets say I want to do 100K minutes per month of VoIP calling at the beginning. What would

First, a little background: I successfully migrated the samba PDC funtionality from an old Suse machine to a new debian-based one. The old machine was named PHOENIX and had an ip address of 10.10.10.4. The new one has the same name but is on 10.10.10.14. Everything is working just fine with this new domain (authentication, adding users, computers, printing etc), except for one laptop. Since the

I posted earlier in the day about needed help with IAX trunking. I did some more reading and made some more changes. Here is what I have thus far: Iax.conf on one server [general] bindport = 4569 bindaddr = 0.0.0.0 disallow=all allow=ulaw allow=alaw allow=gsm mailboxdetail=yes [vvfarm] type=friend username=colo secret=testpassword auth=plaintext host=64.194.211.170 context=iax-incoming

Hi Ola, There was some code done by IBM a few years ago in conjunction with a University that worked and showed the benefits but AFAIK it was never integrated into Xen. The research paper is around on the web. A few of us requested RDMA migration support for version 4.0 and it is at the top of the request list, I suspect it is probably a case of enough people asking and Citrix approving.

Hi, I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as follows: nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own address as source address nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own address as source address And the operating systems is extremely slow Interfaces files : [root at localhost ~]# cat

Dear Xen users, I have a problem with "Xen 3.3.0". All domU (paravirt) only have "32 KB" of cache instead of "6144 KB" as listed in dom0. This is really noticeable under load since the system tends to be really slow. I did not have this problem with "Xen 3.2.1". I''m using the same domU configuration files for the new and the old installation.

Hi all, Someone played with kickstart bonding with centos 6.4 ? CentOS 6.4, as upstream now support ifcae bonding in kickstart network section. I've an issue with configuring a second bonding iface in kicstart on CentOS 6.4. The first bonding (bond0) works as espected but the second is not configured during installation. I've a 6 nic server (two for "puclic" network, two for

I've been having 'gappy' audio problems with nufone for about a week now but I think I've nailed it down. Setup: office* - iax2 - colo* - iax2 - nufone office* and colo* are identical physical hardware (Xeon 2.8, dual ethernet, solely used for Asterisk) -- they are joined together through their second ethernet ports over a dedicated 2meg SDSL link. One hop between office* and