similar to: Asterisk SIP Packet Time (20ms)

Hi Collin, During our arbiter latency testing for completion of ops we found the below results:- an arbiter node in another data centre and both the data bricks in the same data centre, 1) File-size 1 KB (10000 files ) 2) mkdir Latency 5ms 10ms 20ms 50ms 100ms 200ms Ops Create 755 secs 1410 secs 2717 secs 5874 secs 12908 sec 26113 sec Mkdir 922 secs 1725 secs 3325 secs 8127

Interesting table Karan!, Could you please tell us how you did the benchmark? fio or iozone orsimilar? thanks Arman. On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Karan Sandha <ksandha at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Collin, > > During our arbiter latency testing for completion of ops we found the > below results:- an arbiter node in another data centre and both the data > bricks in the

Hi Kevin, Are you saying that the quality is good at 20 ms and bad at 10 ms, or the reverse? Also, is this speech or music? What tool, what options? In general, it helps a lot if you post the sample (input and output). Cheers, Jean-Marc On 06/03/2016 12:48 PM, Kevin Connor wrote: > Hi Opus list, > > I'm noticing a discontinuity in the quality between use of 10ms and > 20ms

Hi, Does anyone know a practical way to determine the number of 20ms speex frames in a given speex packet without actually looping on speex_decode* ? Cheers, Dave -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20080208/0a3e84ac/attachment.html

Adrian may have handled this recently? On Jan 13, 2014 3:34 PM, "Manman Ren" <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > I briefly looked at the bit code files and some types are not uniqued, > here is one example: > !3903 = metadata !{i32 786454, metadata !3904, null, metadata !"int64_t", > i32 198, i64 0, i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, metadata !2258} ; [ DW_TAG_typedef ]

UNCLASSIFIED I just installed SAMBA 4 as the PDC on a new standalone Windows network (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO#Samba_AD_management). Everything appears to be working correctly except for signed dynamic updates. Non-secure updates work fine. A, AAAA and PTR records are added to DNS when a PC joins the domain or I issue ipconfig /registerdns. Using wireshark, I see the

Hi all, I have the following problem. A Linux box configured as a bridge. One interface connects to the router via a crossover cable, the other connects to a switch via the cable that used to go to the router. Now I get the following: [root@localhost net]# ifconfig eth3 eth3 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:03:2D:07:61:5D UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX

Hi Jean-Marc, Sorry for late reply, thanks for interest. It's quality good for 10ms/audio, poorer for 20ms/audio. Quality equivalent for 10,20ms for mode=voip. PESQ was the tool that alerted me to something of interest, but I don't trust PESQ to almost any degree! It's good for hearing relative differences, of course, but not absolutes. Bitrate here was 28kbps, but I hear

Hi all I've googled but can't find an answer to my question. I have two data centers. Currently, I have a replica (count of 2 plus arbiter) in one data center but is used by both. I want to change this to be a distributed replica across the two data centers. There is a 20Mbps pipe and approx 22 ms latency. Is this sufficient? I really don't want to do the geo-replication in its

I use dovecot1.x. for imap on qmail. I also use OExpress to receive my mails. My sent mails is stored in main "sent items" of Outlook Express. Therefore I set "INBOX" in "Root folder path" option. But when I send an email to anywhere the mail sends without problem but I am getting an error as following; Some of the messages in your Outbox Folder could not be copied

>> Yes, I plan to use it in a VoIP environment if I can get latency reduced to >> an acceptable level :) >> The latency depends directly on the overlap parameter, which also controls >> the quality. Higher quality => higher latency. You could set the overlap to >> 0, but that would give you some nasty artifacts. >> You can also resample with smaller block

I've been replacing an old Toshiba DK switch with an Asterisk solution. I'm needing a solution for fax machines that works as well as a POTS line from my carrier. If the POTS line is the solution, I'll keep it, but I'd rather move away from that. Here's what I'm thinking...will it work? I would use a dual-port Digium T1 card. In one port, I'd terminate a telco PRI

Hi all, I'm trying to reduce the startup time for my JIT, but I'm running into the problem that the majority of the time is spent loading the bitcode for my standard library, and I suspect it's due to debug info. My stdlib is currently about 2kloc in a number of C++ files; I compile them with clang -g -emit-llvm, then link them together with llvm-link, call opt -O3 on it, and arrive

David Hogan wrote: > Does anyone know a practical way to determine the number of 20ms speex > frames in a given speex packet without actually looping on speex_decode* ? There's no ready-made function for that. You'd have to write a function that inspects the bits, determines what mode is involved, and jump the right number of bits until a terminator is found or there's no more

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > David Hogan wrote: > >> Does anyone know a practical way to determine the number of 20ms speex >> frames in a given speex packet without actually looping on speex_decode* ? >> > > There's no ready-made function for that. You'd have to write a function > that inspects the bits, determines what mode is involved, and jump the

Hello, Just did a fresh install of xen-4.0 and using the 2.6.31.13 dom0 kernel. I have 6 linux debian guests running, and on my host console i am getting these errors rolling pretty constantly. "Attempting to checksum a non-TCP/UDP packet, dropping a protocol 1 packet" I tried doing the ethtool -K eth0 tx off and same thing on peth0, using bridged mode for network config. Any tips?

Hello, Just did a fresh install of xen-4.0 and using the 2.6.31.13 dom0 kernel. I have 6 linux debian guests running, and on my host console i am getting these errors rolling pretty constantly. "Attempting to checksum a non-TCP/UDP packet, dropping a protocol 1 packet" I tried doing the ethtool -K eth0 tx off and same thing on peth0, using bridged mode for network config. Any tips?

Alexander Chemeris wrote: > Hi, > > Here are some questions from user point of view. :) > > On 5/29/08, Thorvald Natvig <thorvald at natvig.com> wrote: > >> I've done listening tests when converting wb_male.wav to 44.1, 48 and 8khz, >> and there aren't any obvious artifacts. I also did a 16=>16 test, and the >> results are delayed by 10ms

NEW message w/ URL to zip archive containing debug output. Hi I'm having huge problems with OpenSSH 3.0.1p1, compiled with OpenSSL 0.9.6b 9 Jul 2001 and running with prngd_0.9.23, it disconnects unexpectedly during client session due to bad packet length and corruped MAC on input, according to debug anyway. What can cause this kinds of errors? I've verified that both se9104/server and

Hello, There is a feature of zfs (autoexpand, or zpool online -e ) that it can consume the increased LUN immediately and increase the zpool size. That would be a very useful ( vital ) feature in enterprise environment. Though when I tried to use it, it did not work. LUN expanded and visible in format, but zpool did not increase. I found a bug SUNBUG:6430818 (Solaris Does Not Automatically