similar to: High residual CPU usage after hangup

On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Andy Graybeal wrote: >> The Polycom 321 has not been EOL'd and supports VLAN. It is, however, >> lacking a 2nd ethernet port if you were to go that route. >> >> -M >> > Thanks for the response Mark. I see the 331 has two ports and the same > features as the 321. > > I'm wondering what phone would be best being used as an

I have put a pbx into a resort with Polyycom phones, everythign works great, except the kitchen staff cannot hear the phone ring. I know many legacy systems employ a big red flashing light, any ideas on doing something similar? -- Chris Mason NetConcepts (264) 497-5670 Fax: (264) 497-8463 Int: (305) 704-7249 Fax: (815)301-9759 Cell: 264-235-5670 Yahoo IM: netconcepts_anguilla@yahoo.com

Hi all, Has anyone made up custom ring tones for the Polycom SIP phones? We use different rings for different lines, but the ones it comes with are all very similar. In the interesting of sharing, here's one I made up for paging: <PAGE_BEEP se.pat.ringer.13.name="Page Beep" se.pat.ringer.13.inst.1.type="chord" se.pat.ringer.13.inst.1.value="12"

The below seems to give me several minutes of 15-60% cpu usage. As far as I can tell there doesn''t seem to be anything really wrong with my configuration. Anyone have any idea why this might be the case? I also get about 6% memory usage. This is a 3.0 ghz Xeon with 2 gigs of memory. class apache2 { file { "/etc/apache2": recurse =>

Hi all, I''m not sure what qemu-dm does or how to debug its high CPU usage. Any one mind giving me a clue? - Brian _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

I am seeing a rather high CPU usage with 2.2 now: last pid: 30725; load averages: 4.58, 27.36, 25.49 up 0+15:36:12 16:02:53 103 processes: 4 running, 98 sleeping, 1 zombie CPU: 34.5% user, 0.0% nice, 65.4% system, 0.2% interrupt, 0.0% idle Mem: 602M Active, 1767M Inact, 254M Wired, 6116K Cache, 112M Buf, 490M Free Swap: 5900M Total, 5900M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE

I have couple of HVM guests on xen 3.2. When guests boot, qemu-dm uses alot of cpu for approx 20 minutes post boot then load drops to average 0.50. I did some debugging and see this is going on, I suspect display output is using the CPU. Disabling VNC and SDL didn''t help with the CPU usage. any ideas how to reduce the cpu or stop it all together? My setup is as following: Xen

Hello, Using one of Brendan''s dtrace script prusage and prstat, I was able to find the process that is consuming high cpu. I also have a test case that can trigger this high cpu usage. Questions are a) how do I proceed from here? b) how do I figure out which thread is using this high cpu? c) how do I figure out which piece of code is causing this problem? Thanks This message posted from

I am trying to use rsync to backup our Linux server and when the rsync is running it uses 1-2% CPU for most operations until it reaches a tar file (or another file archive), then the CPU usage increases to 90%. I am assuming that rsync is looking at the individual files in the tar archive and seeing if any have changed instead of looking at the mod time and file size. I'm sure this is a

The setup: Downloaded from samba-2.2 branch of cvs as of 9 okt. (also tried 2.okt) installed on a redhat 7.1 2.4.7 i386 system The problem: the smbd process serving a NT 4.0sp6 workstation uses 80+ % cpu smbstatus reveals that the pid is attached as "smbguest" to the IPC$ share. The workstation has opened up another IPC connection at this point. The problem do not show up in

I''ve got a CentOS 4.3 box here which is exhibiting crazy (I think) CPU load on one of the four migration kernel processes: # ps ax | grep migration 2 ? S 0:08 [migration/0] 4 ? S 112:23 [migration/1] 6 ? S 2:48 [migration/2] 8 ? S 0:11 [migration/3] It''s running kernel 2.6.9-34.ELsmp. Does anyone have any idea

On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 23:45 -0400, Andrew J. Barr wrote: > I am trying out the Compiz Fusion stuff on my PowerBook G4 (RV350) and > I have the aiglx-zero-copy-tfp patches from here[0] on Mesa 6.5.2, > xorg-server 1.3, and xf86-video-ati 6.6.191. I notice that the Xorg > process has a high level of CPU utilization (higher than with metacity > or vanilla compiz), but the graphics

http://pastebin.com/vxGM2n5j We are getting those errors 100x per second in console when AGI set debug is on.... It is causing extremely high CPU usage, we've tried asterisk version 1.6.1.22 and 1.6.2.18 It seems the problem is worse in 1.6.2.18 Can someone advise how to fix this? Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I have been using asterisk 10.0.1 for 8 months and now I have updated it to 12.6.0. I have not made much changes in conf files. I am seeing continues warnings saying "Can't send 10 type frames with SIP/Gtalk write" on console. Which I had never seen in the previous version. I have seen compared chan_sip.c from both versions and It seems 12.6.0 is also made to support all the

I installed ToEE under wine 0.9.42 and used ToEE noCD "patch" to make it working but the problem is it's very slow. top says X is using 95% of CPU and ToEE.exe 4,7% - 2 biggest processes. Also in terminal wine throws a lot of: fixme:d3d_draw:drawStridedFast >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GL_INVALID_OPERATION (0x502) from glDrawRangeElements @

did the test result changed in any way? Maybe the DRI2 run was vsynced and the DRI3 not? Nouveau has a pretty high cpu usage in general, because it usually busy waits on fences (I think? not sure where it was exactly that nouveau is busy waiting) > poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> hat am 7. April 2016 um 13:56 geschrieben: > > > > $ glmark2 >

Hello, Is it reasonable for one CPU on the host to be loaded 20-30% on 100 mbps download in a guest? There is barely any (1-2%) load in the guest. The host is running ubuntu 18.04 on an Intel i7-7700K, virtualization etc is enabled. Everything except host load on guest network activity is fine. This is how i setup the network with virt-install: --network

Hi, I am running CentOS 5.3 32bit as a VirtualBox 3.0.0 guest running on Windows XP. The Windows host CPU usage is constantly at 50% although the CentOS guest is completely idle (i.e. 0.00 load average). I know this is a common problem related to the 1000Hz frequency that the CentOS kernel runs at. With previous versions of CentOS, I used the kernel-vm package [1] and it solved my problem.

Greetings, I have written a script using lftp to mirror one directory from a ftp site. I do not have access to the server except for being a humble user. This is running on a fully updated Centos 5.3 box. I am using whatever is provided by the repositories. I noticed that lftp consumes almost all of cpu times I found this while searching for a solution.

On 07/18/2018 10:31 AM, James Pearson wrote: > We have noticed significant desktop/UI lag on CentOS7 workstations using > Mate when the CPU usage is high - i.e. the mouse pointer lags and moving > windows (e.g. terminal windows) become jumpy (not smooth) > > We didn't see (or notice) this issue with CentOS6/Gnome2 > > This can easily be shown by running something like