Displaying 20 results from an estimated 40000 matches similar to: "Am I missing somthing?"
2006 Nov 07
3
connect Sipura with Asterisk - both behind NAT
Does anybody have a good link how to connect Sipura with Asteriks, both
behind NAT? I'm using FWD but their connection is like a weather
(especially IAX), I need something more reliable.
I was thinking of using stun and/or proxy but can not find any good link
explaining how to setup Linux server
--
#Joseph
2004 Aug 02
3
How STUN work?
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040802/d9eed8fc/attachment.htm
-------------- next part --------------
?
Hi
Can anyone give suggestion why we need STUN while using asterisk behind the NAT.
Regards
Shan.
2003 Oct 15
1
SER vs STUND with Asterisk..
One for the gurus..
I have seen there has been a lot of discussion about using SER with
Asterisk.. This to me seemed like an over kill becasue it would
basically be doing most of what Asterisk is doing anyway unless you
create some weird and wonderful config in SER..
Anyway, I decided to go and have a quick read through the SER docs and
in the section about NAT they say that the best way to
2006 May 01
2
SPA-1001 behind NAT -- mucho hair pulling
I've got a Sipura SPA-1001 that I'm trying to get working with an Asterisk server that's on the public Internet, while the SPA-1001
is behind NAT. I did the first obvious thing and mapped ports 5060 and 10000 - 30000 to the local IP address of the SPA-1001.
Tried numerous proxy settings, have all the NAT settings == yes. Registration seems to be happening; with sip debug on, I see
2003 Mar 05
6
Known SIP - NAT Solutions?
I have recently begun experimenting with Asterisk, and have been
mightily impressed by its capabilities and flexibility. I have run
across one problem, however, that challenges my ability to use it as a
production system.
My Asterisk box has a public Internet IP, and works great with SIP
(ATA 186) clients that also have public IP addresses. Unfortunately,
most of the locations that I would
2004 May 04
7
stun server
What is the best free stun server out there? The one that I have looked at
from vovida requires two NICs. Is this neccessary?
2006 Oct 10
3
Understanding NAT Traversal
Quick question re. NAT traversal.
I understand how sitting behind a NAT could cause problems for a SIP UA.
The SIP UA would create SIP mesages using IP addresses from inside the
network (i.e. 192.#.#.# or 10.#.#.#) and these IP addresses are of course
unnavigable for the recipient.
What I don't get is why don't web browsers suffer the same problem?
A web brower behind a NAT sends an
2005 Jun 03
3
Sip UA behind NAT
I am trying to make 1 soft SIP UA behind NAT connect to a public hard
CISCO UA via a public asterisk server. The CISCO UA can hear the voice
from the SIP UA but not vice versa. I do set nat to yes for the soft
phone. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Below is my sip.conf
[general]
port = 8060 ; Port to bind to (SIP is 5060)
bindaddr = 0.0.0.0 ; Address to bind to (all
2007 Feb 14
6
Fax with T.38
Hi all,
I install the last version of Asterisk and I tried to send faxes, but
nothing works.
Here is my configuration:
Analog Fax <----> IP <----> Asterisk <----> IP <----> Patton M-ATA
<----> Analog Fax 2
I tried Analog Fax 2 -> Analog Fax but nothing works!!
In the Patton configuration I put G711 and no silence suppression.
In asterisk I have
2004 Jan 14
3
grandstream asterisk configuration
hi,
I have the following configuration:
Grandstream --> NAT (Netgear RP614)-->Internet-->Asterisk(public IP)
i can register fine and call ringing is working as good. The problem is =
i cant hear audio both ways and i get this error:
WARNING[22544]: File rtp.c, Line 375 (ast_rtp_read): RTP Read error:
Resource temporarily unavailable
my sip.conf file is as follows:
2006 Nov 02
1
is IAX required for firewall and router?
I'm trying to understand IAX and whether or not it would solve my
difficulties:
'The primary goals for IAX were to minimize bandwidth used in media
transmissions, with particular attention drawn to control and individual
voice calls, and to provide native support for NAT (Network Address
Translation) transparency. Another goal is to be easy to use behind
firewalls.'
2005 Sep 13
2
Nat & Sip & Pain
Hi everyone,
I decided to have a look at SIP & NAT again and I've been at it for a
[quite a] few hours but typically nothing is working for me. Actually
I'm not sure if SIP and NAT can ever work but some emails on this list
do suggest that someone has got it working, once, maybe.
I'm experimenting with a ZyXEL 2000W [WiFi Sip phone] which supports
"Outbound Proxy",
2007 Aug 01
3
How to use stun server?
Hi all,
This is the first time i am using stun with asterisk for nat problems. I
have read the rfc which describes how stun works. i didnt have any problems
understanding it. I have also intalled the stun server called stund which i
downloaded from sourceforge. I have seen on the list that most people use
stund here. I have started the stun server and its running silently. Now i
dont know what to
2005 May 31
2
Sipura 2000 behind NAT issue, Vonage is working
Hi,
I'm trying to configure Sipura 2000 (behind NAT) which connects to
Asterisk (public IP, no NAT) and having interesting results. When Sipura
is behind Linux/NAT firewall it works great and no special NAT settings
on Sipura are necessary. The issue I'm having is when Sipura is behind
Linksys broadband NAT router. Sipura gets registered with Asterisk just
fine, but I can't hear
2003 May 24
4
Free World Dialup behind NAT
Hi,
after reading about it on the list I decided to set up a Free World
Dialup account. For those of you who don't know, that is a sip proxy
where you and your friends can singn up free and then you can just
connect to it with any sip client and call anybody that is registered
for free. Pretty much like iaxtel (I belive that was the name of it) for
the iax protocol. It even supports clients
2008 Oct 01
1
No reply to our critical packet
I am using a Polycom 501 SIP phone behind NAT. Asterisk server is
public with no NAT... everything works on the Asterisk end just fine
EXCEPT that I can never check voice mail
After about 30 seconds the call drops with these messagess:
[Sep 30 23:47:48] WARNING[26819]: chan_sip.c:1950 retrans_pkt: Maximum
retries exceeded on transmission
320893f1-50c13ba3-78c26164 at 192.168.1.54 for seqno 2
2005 Mar 28
1
Asterisk, SER, NAT, STUN and the whole debate
Guys.
Im reading a lot about ser, nat, stun, etc. And I noticed there are a lot of
ways to get around nat but I would like to hear some success stories about
handling nat users with multiple voip phones behind nat.
I have my asterisk box behind but ports are forwarded (5060 5004 10000-20000
for rtp and 4569 for iax2) but still.. I can quite figure out what ser and
stund have to do on this
2005 Jan 27
3
SIP + NAT = horrible mess
Hi Guys,
After days of fiddling, I can't really get my SIP device to work
communicate with Asterisk behind NAT. Sometimes the STUN server is
flaky, sometimes the device isn't reachable if the connection is dropped
and then put back on, sometimes it registers OK, sometimes it doesn't, etc.
I've come to the same conclusion as the wiki: it's probably better to
avoid this
2015 Aug 10
2
webrtc no audio
hello,
i'm facing strange problem
asterisk13.5 + chan_sip wss transport + SIPML5 1.5.230
person1 to person3 are behind different NATs
audio devices double checked
call from person1(chrome) to person2(chrome) works
call from person1(chrome) to person 3(chrome) - no audio on both side
(RTP flowing only in one direction)
call from person2(chrome) to person 3(chrome) - no audio on both side
2004 May 30
11
New Firefly version
As Promised, I've released a new version of Firefly (ver 1.8) with IAX &
SIP support back in.
Get it from Virbiage site or here's the direct link
http://www.virbiage.com/firefly/download/firefly-thirdparty.exe
If it crashes on startup, export your Firefly tree from the registry
(current user -> software -> firefly), then delete tree from your
registry. If that fixes it, send