similar to: direct-inward-dialing (DID)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "direct-inward-dialing (DID)"

2004 Aug 11
2
Autoattendant Configuration
Hi, At my house, I have two POTS lines. Both are connected to my * server on a TDM400P card. As an example, say the phone numbers are (919)555-1212 and (919)555-1213. I also have four SIP extensions, an ATA with a fax machine, and a DID coming in from an ITSP. I have an autoattendant configured that talks and allows users to forward to the extension they choose, but my family doesn't like
2003 Apr 23
2
Call Queue Manager and DID Digits
I've been asked to create a graphical "call-queue" manager. That is, use the existing call queues application but allow a way to view what's coming and attach information to it. As far as the "attaching information" that's in the realm of my application, but I'm trying to figure out if the internals of queues are exposed through any interface. Any help there?
2003 Oct 03
3
Message Waiting on Cisco 7940 does not work
I have a cisco 7940 with the following sip.conf config: [Desk1.1] type=friend secret=****** defaultip=192.168.1.14 insecure=no mailbox=102 callerid="Desk1.1" qualify=500 canreinvite=no context=extensions host=dynamic group=2 I do not get message waiting indicator (mwi) on this phone. Is the another .conf file invilved in configuring this function other than the mailbox=xxx in the
2004 Aug 27
3
Digit detect during a Background() inside a Macro wrongly jumps b ack to the calling context to match digits?
Consider this dialplan fragment, where the call is being dialed into [macro-process-routing] over an iax2 channel from another (same build) Asterisk server: [macro-process-routing] ; This is the entrypoint of the debug call but is also refered to by Macro(process-routing) elsewhere in the dialplan ; XXX-NNN-6800 exten => _6800,1,Macro(6800-interceptor) ; This is matched when 8 is
2003 Dec 22
3
DID trunks -- equipment requirement
Hi guys, I posted a somewhat similar question about a month ago and got a thoughtful resonse from Steven Critchfield, but I've got a quick follow up question to it. I'm looking to setup a 16 extension / 10-14 phone line Asterisk install for a customer who would like to have DID numbers for the extensions, since they're currently on Centrex and already have the 1-to-1
2003 Oct 09
1
7940/60 TFTP Problem
> -----Original Message----- > From: Babak Pasdar [mailto:bpasdar@IGXGlobal.com] > > I was wondering if anyone else has had this problem. I have purchused > several Cisco 7940 and 7960 phones. Of the 5 phones so far I have run > accross 2 that that give me malformed TFTP and refuse to upgrade to the > latest version of SIP code -- 5.3. In fact some of the other phones also
2003 Oct 07
5
IAX and Jitter problem
Hello, I've been playing around with * for quite a while now, and have run into a problem that I just cannot seem to figure out. When using * and any IAX client (I have tested with GnoPhone and both clients from iaxclient.sourceforge.net) I have incredibly bad jitter on the connection. What I'm running is a P3-1Ghz machine with 512mb ram for a server. The other end has been
2007 May 09
3
[LLVMdev] Compiling glibc on Linux
I am convinced to use llvm-gcc. As I mentioned in my previous email, I have changed native code generation in llc to generate code with a different stack organization. In order to have working binaries, the libraries must be compiled with the new tool and have the same stack organization. Now that I cannot use llc, it seems that I have to modify llvm-gcc to have it generate code with the
2007 May 09
2
[LLVMdev] Compiling glibc on Linux
Thank you Chris. Actually, I have changed the stack organization in the "llc" source codes for x86 target. Thus, I need libraries compiled with the new stack organization. If I use llvm-gcc (and apparently also llvmc), llc will not be invoked. I was hoping that llvmc would call llvm-gcc to compile to bc file and then call llc to compile to native assembly, but apparently this
2008 Nov 24
2
lattice contourplot background covers inward-facing ticks
I wish to have inward-pointing ticks on my contourplot graph, but the colored background produced by the "region=TRUE" statement covers the ticks up, is there any way around this? Sample code below. --Seth library(lattice) model <- function(a,b,c,d,e, f, X1,X2) # provide model function for contour plot {J <- a + (b*X1) + (c*X2) + (d*X1*X2) + e*(X1^2) + f*(X2^2) pp
2007 May 09
2
[LLVMdev] Compiling glibc on Linux
Hi, I am trying to compile glibc on Linux using llvm. I need to do this for a research project. The problem is that llvmc doesn't work, and I guess I have to set CC=llvmc to get the glic compiled. For some reason llvmc complains that it cannot find %llvmcc1%. I have this problem both on my Mac and my Linux system. Other tools that I have tested including llvm-gcc work without any
2007 May 09
2
[LLVMdev] Compiling glibc on Linux
Reid, Thank you for your quick reply. Yes, I have built and installed llvm-gcc and "llvm-gcc --print-prog- name=cc1" return the correct path for cc1, so I assume its path is set correctly in the config files, but I haven't installed config files separately. Do I need to do that? Is there any documentation about it? Thank you again, Babak On May 8, 2007, at 7:33 PM, Reid
2007 May 09
0
[LLVMdev] Compiling glibc on Linux
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 13:38 -0700, Babak Salamat wrote: > I am convinced to use llvm-gcc. As I mentioned in my previous email, > I have changed native code generation in llc to generate code with a > different stack organization. In order to have working binaries, the > libraries must be compiled with the new tool and have the same stack > organization. Now that I cannot use
2007 May 09
0
[LLVMdev] Compiling glibc on Linux
Babak, I strongly suggest you drop trying to use llvmc. Instead, probably just compiling your library with llvm-gcc should be sufficient. The llvm-gcc tool has much of llc's functionality built in to it so you're going to get the same output. If that doesn't work for you, then please describe what you're trying to do in more detail and we'll tell you how it can be done.
2007 Apr 24
2
[LLVMdev] (no subject)
Hello, I am trying to add an instruction before each function call to add/ subtract the stack pointer by a value specified at the command line. I wonder if I can do that during lowering. For example, in X86TargetLowering::LowerCALL. I appreciate it if you give me some hints how and where I can do that. Thank you, Babak
2007 May 09
0
[LLVMdev] Compiling glibc on Linux
Babak, As its manual page (http://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/html/llvmc.html) states, llvmc is an experimental tool: llvmc is considered an experimental LLVM tool because it has these deficiencies: Poor configuration support The support for configuring new languages, etc. is weak. There are many command line configurations that cannot be achieved with the current
2007 May 09
0
[LLVMdev] Compiling glibc on Linux
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Babak Salamat wrote: > Yes, I have built and installed llvm-gcc and "llvm-gcc --print-prog- > name=cc1" return the correct path for cc1, so I assume its path is > set correctly in the config files, but I haven't installed config > files separately. Do I need to do that? Is there any documentation > about it? I'd strongly suggest just building
2007 Apr 24
0
[LLVMdev] (no subject)
Hi, During isel lowering, the backend insertes CALLSEQ_START / CALLSEQ_END target independent nodes to the DAG. These are then selected to X86 specific instructions ADJCALLSTACKDOWN / ADJCALLSTACKUP. At these point, they have a constant arguments which corresponds to the fixed frame size for argument passing. But the size of the stack frame isn't finalized until frame layout has
2011 May 22
11
Problems Connecting to SQL Server
Hi all I want to connect my app to MSSQL but when i type rake db:migrate an erro occured like this: ←[31mCould not find gem ''odbc (>= 0, runtime)'' in any of the gem sources listed in your Gemfile.←[0m this is my YML file: development: adapter: sqlserver mode: odbc dsn: ontrack host: BABAK-PC pool: 5 timeout: 5000 and in my gem file gem
2007 May 01
2
Autoattendant press 1 collides with extension numbers...
So I have whose autoattendant is colliding with their extensions... Quick fix anyone? Second someone presses say a person's extension (101) ... Autoattendant sends them to the first context... [companyx-main-aa] exten => s,1,Background(companyx/companyx-main) exten => s,2,Background(silence/10) exten => s,3,Background(companyx/companyx-main) exten => s,4,Background(silence/10)