similar to: No way to review Voicemail busy message?

I know it's been touched on before, but no answers have been found to the best of my knowledge. I'm using a SIP only setup, with a sip provider giving PSTN and would like to see if anyone has an idea for creating redial busy using ${DIALSTATUS} and possibly MeetMe? I figure something like this, but want to get feedback 1. Get callers last dialed number, if international number, do not

I was wondering if anyone knew of a way to create a busy-redial feature in the * dialplan? For example, you try to call 12125551212 but the number is busy, so you hang up and dial *XX12125551212 and hangup again, then * would continue to retry calling the number until either it rings or a timeout is reached, if it rings * then calls back the exten that made the *XX call and bridges the two

https://reviews.llvm.org/D41659 Implemented missing trigonometric optimization in llvm. Here we have implemented the following missing trigonometric optimizations. 1. tan(x)*cos(x)=sin(x) 2. sin(x)*cos(x) = sin(2*x)/2 3. sin(x)/tan(x)=cos(x); 4. tan(x)/sin(x)=1/cos(x); -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

As I understood, Asterisk has a lot of features but lacks native 3-way calling and attended transfer. It would be great to have these features available to a simple IAX phone. I wonder how this could be implemented in Asterisk without asking for a patch. It should be possible with parking, conferencing, AGI and the manager interface. The extension 77 could be used by the attendant to blindly

Hello, I'm trying to figure out how to change the redial, thus far if I hit redial it will redial the last called I made that was answered, not the last call I made that was not answer. I'm using Asterisk 1.8 Thanks, Motty

Hi, What is the best way to implement Automatic Redial on No Answer ? Looking at http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-12.txtI can see how Automatic Redial on Busy could (should) be done. How would you do it on No Answer ? Is there any event you should SUBSCRIBE to so that you're notified that you're callee is available ? What if you ask to be notified

Hello everybody, I would like to implement "callback" function. When I call a person and his extension is busy I can press, for example, 5 and get a callback when his phone is not busy anymore. When I create a call file and copy it to spool call folder asterisk makes a call. One problem is that when extension is still busy my phone rings and I get busy tone of the person who I am

Hi all, I have an external application commanding asterisk by AMI and AsyncAGI. I also have a dialplan like this: ; AsyncAGI extensions exten => _8.,1,Noop(entering in AGI loop at 8 ${EXTEN}); exten => _8.,n,AGI(agi:async); exten => _8.,n,Hangup(); ; Meetme extensions exten => _1.,1,Noop(Conference ${EXTEN} ${CONTEXT}); exten =>

Hi, Try as I might, I can't get hangups detected on a Zap channel with loop start lines. So, after someone leaves a voicemail and then hangs up, Asterisk doesn't know it, exits VoicemailMain2, and loops back to the corporate greeting, tying up the line even though the outside caller has hung up. Therefore, I've added the following hideous hack - er, code - to voicemail2.c. It

I have an asterisk box and SIP / IAX2 phones. To call out, users have to add 0 (zero) before a real telephone number. That means, that if they want to call someone that has a number 123456, they have to call 0-123456. Simple, right? This has a serious drawback though - when someone calls us from the number 123456, we see the callerID 123456, and we're unable to use the callback/redial

B.H. Hello, all. We have a dialer software that runs outgoing telephony campaigns. We have been using it successfully with PRI cards, now we're evaluating it's use also with a SIP trunk. Most of the things run perfectly good without a need to change anything except for dial string, but there's some strange problem with asterisk interpreting SIP result codes. Our software is written

Hello, I am not entirely sure the subject line captures what I am trying to do, but hopefully this description of the problem will help folks to see my challenge and hopefully offer constructive assistance. I have an experimental setup where I measure the decrease in oxygen in small vials as an organism, such as an oyster, consumes the oxygen. Each vial is calibrated before the experiment and

On Jun 16, 2007, at 12:35 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: >> Result compiled with llvm-g++ 2.0: >> tan float: -2.18504 >> tan double: 0.309336 > > This may be due to bug 1505. It fails on x86 using x87 floating point, with the inliner not run, because of 1505, yes. Gonsolo, is that your situation? (What happens is, there is a wrapper in the header file for std::tan (float),

Hi list, I am having some difficulty implementing a certain dialplan where the following happens. If the first Dial() is not answered, I want to play a small greeting then ask the caller to either hold the line (try calling again) or press 1 to leave voicemail. exten => s,1,Dial(${BLAH},10,Tt) ; Dial 10 sec exten => s,2,Answer exten => s,3,Playback(greeting)

Hello, I have to dial prefix 9 for non local numbers however when i missed calls i Can't redial this number because of "9" is not append . I use polycom phones . What Can i do ? Harry __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? En finir avec le spam? Yahoo! Mail vous offre la meilleure protection possible contre les messages non sollicit?s

Hi, I would like to implement an auto-redial function in a context. The idea is about like this: Dial a number Hear busy Hangup Pick up again Dial a code like *123 => jumps into a context which redials until callresult is not busy Maybe like this: [autoredial] exten => s,1,Set(number=${CHANNEL(lastdialed)}) exten => s,2,Dial(SIP/${number}@account,60,g) exten => s,3,Wait(15) exten

Hi! Dale Johannesen schrieb: > > On Jun 16, 2007, at 12:35 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > >>> Result compiled with llvm-g++ 2.0: >>> tan float: -2.18504 >>> tan double: 0.309336 >> >> This may be due to bug 1505. > > It fails on x86 using x87 floating point, with the inliner not run, > because of 1505, yes. Gonsolo, is that your situation? >

Hi! <tangens_bug.cc> #include <iostream> #include <cmath> int main() { float a = 0.3; double b = 0.3; float result_a = std::tan( a ); float result_b = std::tan( b ); std::cout << "tan float: " << result_a << std::endl; std::cout << "tan double: " << result_b << std::endl; }

The same argument would hold for tan(pi/2). I don't say the result 'NaN' is wrong, but I thought, tan(pi*x) and tanpi(x) should give the same result. Hans Werner On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 8:44 PM, William Dunlap <wdunlap at tibco.com> wrote: > It should be the case that tan(pi*x) != tanpi(x) in many cases - that is why > it was added. The limits from below and below of the

I have question (curiosity) regarding returned values of R's qcauchy () function, for nonexceedance probability (F). It seems the ideal returned range of cauchy distribution should be [-Inf,Inf]. For F=0 > qcauchy(0) [1] -Inf but for F=1 > qcauchy(1) [1] 8.16562e+15 It seems to me that the proper return value should be Inf??? For default (location=0,scale=1) quantile function of