similar to: TDMoE implementation suggestions

I have a problem browsing in my subnets let me explain me situation: I have a m0n0wall (FreeBSD based router software) with 3 nics. nic1:My WAN connection Nic2:My LAN connection (192.168.0.0/24 m0n0 is DHCP) Nic3:My Wifi connenciot (192.168.1.0/24 m0n0 is DHCP) just using ip-adresses acrossed the network is no problem. now i want to use windows browsing works on LAN but can't see the

Hi, I've just joined the list because of questionnaire in the forum [1]. The hardware is AMD-V(IOMMU) capable and is enabled in the BIOS with 3 NICs. I currently have host Windows 2008 R2 installed but binds (network services and protocols) on NIC3 only. My guests on VMWare workstation (has bridged network service bound on all 3 NIC) has bridged 3 NICs for the guests where NIC1 is WAN, NIC2

Signed-off-by: Scott Seago <sseago at redhat.com> --- src/test/functional/host_controller_test.rb | 41 -------------------- .../functional/managed_node_configuration_test.rb | 14 ++++--- src/test/functional/nic_controller_test.rb | 8 ---- src/test/functional/permission_controller_test.rb | 15 ++++--- src/test/functional/quota_controller_test.rb | 2 +-

Ok, the story is this, I''m running an Unreal Tournament 2004 server. It''s running on a system that has two external NICs that are connected to different ISPs. I would like players to be able to connect to the server from either link. My default gateway goes through NIC1. For traffic through NIC2 to work I simply added an extra routing table and rule. The extra routing table has

Hello everyone, can someone please tell me if the configuration previously shown is eventually going to work? Stefano Il giorno lun 19 ott 2020 alle ore 18:56 Stefano Vargiu < vstefanoxx at gmail.com> ha scritto: > I add some additional information I didn't give in my previous email, > specifically how I tried to force DC1 and DC2 to contact each other only > with their VPN

Hello, We've just started using TDMoE(local T1s connecting between Asterisk servers in the same building over the LAN) to connect a few of our high-availability servers instead of using crossover T1 cables. The 3 servers we have connected to each other over TDMoE are running just fine and we have no audio quality issues or bandwidth issues, but I'm considering using TDMoE to connect 8

I'm just experimenting with dynamic spans using TDMoE, which looks ideal for clustering Asterisk boxes with low latency (i.e. 1ms for TDMoE compared with 20ms for IAX). When using normal E1s and T1s, I've always used ISDN signalling: either EuroISDN or NI2. So naturally I tried that over the TDMoE. I've found that I get a lot of HDLC errors and the D-channel is up and down like a

I add some additional information I didn't give in my previous email, specifically how I tried to force DC1 and DC2 to contact each other only with their VPN IPs. I did so using dnsmasq as a DNS proxy. # DC1 configuration IP NIC1: 172.16.0.2 IP NIC2: 172.20.0.1 IP VPN: 172.19.1.173 --- /etc/resolv.conf: search domain.local domain domain.local nameserver 172.19.1.173 --- I configured dnsmasq

On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 7:42 AM Stefano Vargiu via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I'm trying to add a second DC to a Samba 4 AD: they both have multiple NICs > and for this reason cannot find a way to make it work. > They communicate through VPN and both have one of the bound interfaces set > to the same IP address, 172.20.0.1, which

I just came across http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php? page=Asterisk%20TDMoE and seemed very interesting. It prompted me to question whether it would be more efficient to do TDMoE or IAX2. The application is very simple. I have two asterisk boxes. One is strictly a gateway to the PSTN using multiple T1s. The second is where all my extensions and dialplan are defined (the workhorse for

On 19/10/2020 12:40, Stefano Vargiu via samba wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm trying to add a second DC to a Samba 4 AD: they both have multiple NICs > and for this reason cannot find a way to make it work. > They communicate through VPN and both have one of the bound interfaces set > to the same IP address, 172.20.0.1, which doesn't allow me to route to the > correct

Hello everybody, I use 2 samba servers. Server A (SA) is connected to networks n1 and n2. It is the wins server and the domain controller with domain logons and used as password server. Server B (SB) is connected to networks n2 and n3. As diagram it looks like this: +---n2-----(SA)----n1--+ | (SB) | +-------n3---+ Server B's smb.conf has: ... time server = yes domain master = no local

Hi all, I'm having some problems getting TDMoE setup for the 1st time. I have a TE405P installed in the main server with an ethernet cross-connection to the secondary machine. (Yes, I know about IAX2 but I want to use TDMoE to simulate using T1s.) I'm using -HEAD from yesterday. On the main machine /etc/zaptel.conf: loadzone = us defaultzone=us

Hi, is it possible to have 2 different ISP in one server? i have 2 NIC cards im going to config ISP1 in NIC1 and ISP2 in NIC2? what should be the configuration for this setup? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070412/4c62019f/attachment-0004.html>

Hello everyone, I'm trying to add a second DC to a Samba 4 AD: they both have multiple NICs and for this reason cannot find a way to make it work. They communicate through VPN and both have one of the bound interfaces set to the same IP address, 172.20.0.1, which doesn't allow me to route to the correct DC, and that is only part of the problem. Here is the configuration: *

hello all, I have been trying to set-up bridged network with VLAN and not able to succeed as many tutorials address only single NIC. I am trying to setup 2 guests (backtrack instance) each guest has NIC1 and NIC2. following is snippet for guest1 I am not able to get 192.168.0.2 address back on guest eth0. VIRT-MANAGER GUI : guest1-lan details radio button left side panel NIC1

Hi, I just got a T1 interface for a AT&T (became Lucent) System75 (uses same cards as Definity). I would take a crack at making a cable but can't determine the pinout for a cable and it is not apparent from the board. Asking you guys makes sense as one of you may have one of these systems. The cable has a amphenol male D50 connector on one end and probably a rj45 on the other. I also

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Boris Epstein <borepstein at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello there, > > What is the hypervisor that hosts the VM? What does ifconfig show on it? > > Boris. > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On 11/06/2016 11:00 PM, Sean Son wrote: > > > >> How do I

We have been pretty much able to solve our echo problems, except for the primary mode in which we desire to operate our system. See system diagram at bottom. Prior to making adjustments to cancel echos (all echocancel=no): Call Type Result (Before) --------- --------------- CP <- LEC PRI * TDMoE * FXO -> AP

Hello, I've been using TDMoE accross 2 * boxes for months. It was working well, but * would crash when anyone would try to connect via h.323. So, I got the latest CVS release and compiled without h.323 support. After I made and installed the latest CVS the TDMoE channels stopped working. They have been working great (especially after we got echo cancel working them, thanks Mark) and the