similar to: Checking for monotonic sequence

This is of course disallowed, which I discovered only after nearly completing my spanking new ajaxified UI. What is the motivation behind this, and what is the best workaround? This UI does a scriptaculous drag-and-drop of items from a first div (div1) over to a second div (div2), which triggers the contents of div2 to be updated to reflect the drop. No prob, thus far. But then the

Sorry for my ignoreance I''m kind of new to this.... I have a requirement for a page that essentially consists of three "DIVS". DIV1 - This is static, it has a bunch of links that initiate a AJAX request to populate DIV2 DIV2 - Populated as a result of a request initiated from DIV1. - This needs to have further links that will initiate a AJAX request to populate DIV3.

Hi, I''ve been able to succesfully queue page.visual_effect commands in my RJS templates. Each command will wait to execute until the previous command is done executing. But I''d also like to execute a page.replace_html command AFTER the page.visual_effect commands. I have a series of five DIVs: div1 div2 div3 div4 div5 When the user clicks on div1, a page.visual_effect

Hello ! I''m trying to implement something similar to the "multiple updates" section of the Web2.0 chapter of the Agile book. I implemented my version, and nothing is happening. No javascript errors, my logs look fine, page is rendered fine... just no Effect.Highlight. Here is the code: views/causes/cause_home/index.rhtml =============== <%= form_remote_tag(:complete =>

I have been using multiple observers, i.e., observe_field(), on the same input field and relying on them to execute in the same order that they appear in the page. This has been working fine in FireFox, but it does not seem to work in MSIE; the requests come in and are processed in a different order. Now, I''ve always been a little hesitant about using this technique, but it always

Hello, Assuming I have the following setup for one page: <column A><data from controller 1 /> </columnA> <column B><data from controller 2 /> </columnB> <column C><data from controller 3 /> </columnC> Assuming the page is created for Controller 2, what would be the best way(s) to gather/render the data from the other controllers? Best

On 08.08.2013, at 18:25, Chad Rosier <chad.rosier at gmail.com> wrote: > I would like to transform X/Y -> X*1/Y. Specifically, I would like to convert: > > define void @t1a(double %a, double %b, double %d) { > entry: > %div = fdiv fast double %a, %d > %div1 = fdiv fast double %b, %d > %call = tail call i32 @foo(double %div, double %div1) > ret void >

I did few transformation in Instruction *InstCombiner::visitFDiv() in an attempt to remove some divs. I may miss this case. If you need to implement this rule, it is better done in Instcombine than in DAG combine. Doing such xform early expose the redundancy of 1/y, which have positive impact to neighboring code, while DAG combine is bit blind. You should be very careful, reciprocal is very

Hi Chad, This is a great transform to do, but you’re right that it’s only safe under fast-math. This is particularly interesting when the original divisor is a constant so you can materialize the reciprocal at compile-time. You’re right that in either case, this optimization should only kick in when there is more than one divide instruction that will be changed to a mul. I don’t have a strong

I remember why I didn't implement this rule in Instcombine. It add one instruction. So, this xform should be driven by a redundancy eliminator if you care code size. On 8/8/13 10:13 AM, Shuxin Yang wrote: > I did few transformation in Instruction *InstCombiner::visitFDiv() in > an attempt to remove some divs. > I may miss this case. If you need to implement this rule, it is >

I would like to transform X/Y -> X*1/Y. Specifically, I would like to convert: define void @t1a(double %a, double %b, double %d) { entry: %div = fdiv fast double %a, %d %div1 = fdiv fast double %b, %d %call = tail call i32 @foo(double %div, double %div1) ret void } to: define void @t1b(double %a, double %b, double %d) { entry: %div = fdiv fast double 1.000000e+00, %d %mul = fmul

This is the beginnings of HDMI 2.0 support. All of the "extra" features are left out, such as 12/16bpc, YUV420, etc. I've verified that with this code, a GP108 (GT1030) can switch between 4k at 60 and 1920x1080 at 60 on a LG 4K TV. Further, I've verified via i2c tools, that the SCDC writes really do happen. I suspect that the patch for keeping track of the high-speed TMDS

I am trying a setup where the one loop is rewritten as two loops. This avoids the 'rem' and 'div' instructions in the index calculation (which give the loop vectorizer a hard time). However, with this setup the loop vectorizer complains about a too small loop. LV: Checking a loop in "main" LV: Found a loop: L3 LV: Found a loop with a very small trip count. This loop

Hello all, I've been trying to compile metamail on Centos4.2. But no luck so far. rpmbuild --rebuild metamail-2.7-30AS.src.rpm Installing metamail-2.7-30AS.src.rpm Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.96604 + umask 022 + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + rm -rf mm2.7 + /bin/gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/mm2.7.tar.Z + tar

I believe we were under the impression that InstCombine, as a canonicalized/optimizer, should not increase code size but only reduce it. Minor aside, but you don't need all of fast-math for the IR, just the "arcp" flag, which allows for replacement of division with reciprocal-multiply. On Aug 8, 2013, at 10:21 AM, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > I remember

In the case when coming from C it was probably the loop unroller and SLP vectorizer which vectorized the code. Potentially I could do the same in the IR. However, the loop body that is generated in the IR can get very large. Thus, the loop unroller will refuse to unroll the loop in a large number of (important) cases. Isn't there a way to convince the loop vectorizer that it should

On Aug 8, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Chad, > > This is a great transform to do, but you’re right that it’s only safe under fast-math. This is particularly interesting when the original divisor is a constant so you can materialize the reciprocal at compile-time. You’re right that in either case, this optimization should only kick in when

Dear all, just a quick question regarding weights in logistic regression. I do results <- lrm(y.js ~ h.hhsize + h.death1 + h.ill1 + h.ljob1 + h.fin1 + h.div1 + h.fail1 + h.sex + h.ch.1

Hi! I have a div called Div1 I have a style #Div1:hover that changes the background color to Div1 (want to see if the hover event is fired) I make Div1 Droppable with a hoverclass that adds a border (to see the hover event too) Then if I put the mouse above the div''s background color changes as expected (I could deduce that the z-index is not a problem) If I put a draggable above it,

Hi, I have a number of issues compiling samba 3.4.0pre1 using makerpms.sh, under the RHEL folder in packaging. 1) samba.spec refers to 'source' when the folder has been renamed to 'source3' (easy enough to amend) which made it fail very early on. 2) Following that - (apologies in advance, if I have gone over the top in pasting output), it seems to be complaining about missing