similar to: nuisance variables

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "nuisance variables"

2018 Mar 28
0
netCDF to GeoTIFF by layer in r
Hi Ahmed, When reading from a ncdf file you can use the 'varname', 'lvar' and 'level' arguments - see the 'Details' section in the docs https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/raster/versions/2.6-7/topics/raster <https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/raster/versions/2.6-7/topics/raster> We can't tell what is in the ncdf file from what you report other
2018 Mar 28
2
Fwd: netCDF to GeoTIFF by layer in r
Hi I have a netCDF file of volumetric soil water content at four different soil layers and want to convert each soil layer in the netCDF file to a GeoTIFF layer. This code converts the netCDF file to one GeoTIFF layer, i.e. unclear which soil depth. file.nc <- "C:/Soil_Weather_data/Agro/VMC21/VMC21.nc" file.tiff <- "C:/Soil_Weather_data/Agro /VMC21/VMC21" importnetcdf
2008 May 19
1
three-dimensional (volumetric) estimation from x,y,z points
Dear all, I have a set of x,y,z points obtained from a lizard species and now I would like to estimate the three-dimensional use of space for this species. I know that 2D area I can estimate using adehabitat packages, but I don´t know how to estimate the volumetric space. Any help are welcome. Miltinho Brazil [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2002 Jul 04
3
How to check which current version you're running ????
Stein Hustad System & Database Administrator Norsk Agip A/S ICT Department Tel. NO-51 57 48 77 Fax. NO-51 80 05 65 email: stein.hustad@norskagip.agip.it email: firmapost@norskagip.agip.it Postal: Norsk Agip ,P.O.Box 101 Forus,4064 Stavanger, Norway
2005 Feb 28
2
Problems with downloading
Hello I'm using your program R in a course I'm taking at the University of Oslo, and thereby I need to download it to my PC. Unfortunately I do have some problems, I do not know whish files to download and how I do it. Can you please send me a list of what to download and a like where to find it? Thanks a lot, best regards Maria Befring Hovda PhD-student Norconserv AS, Seafood
2019 Apr 02
2
samba 4.10.0 - problem with samba-tool domain provision
Hi, I am currently installing Samba 4.10.0 on a CentOS7 test system facing problems with the provisioning of AD. I built samba from source; configure/make/make install finished successfully. When running the "samba-tool domain provision" command I get the following error messages: [root at geo22 ~]# samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --interactive WARNING: Ignoring invalid value
2007 Aug 27
2
validate (package Design): error message "subscript out of bounds"
Dear R users I use Windows XP, R2.5.1 (I have read the posting guide, I have contacted the package maintainer first, it is not homework). In a research project on renal cell carcinoma we want to compute Harrell's c index, with optimism correction, for a multivariate Cox regression and also for some univariate Cox models. For some of these univariate models I have encountered an error
2012 Apr 26
1
Using the R predict function to forecast a model fit with auto.arima function
Hello R users, Hope everyone is doing great. I have a dataset that is in .csv format and consists of two columns: one named Period (which contains dates in the format yyyy_mm) and goes from 1995_10 to 2007_09 and the second column named pcumsdry which is a volumetric measure and has been formatted as numeric without any commas or decimals. I imported the dataset as pauldataset and made use of
2019 Aug 29
2
no DNS functionality on second subnet
Hi, we have successfully installed our samba4 AD domain with AD DC, smb file server and Windows/Linux clients in the same subnet. Now we try to add a couple of Windows PCs to the domain that are located in a different subnet. As soon as the AD DC is added as the DNS server on the Windows clients it is no longer possible to resolve ip addresses. In other words, for those PCs DNS is not working.
2019 Jun 06
2
same username in /etc/passwd and in AD
>On 04/06/2019 12:24, Andreas Habel via samba wrote: >> Hi, >> >> we are currently in the process of testing a Samba AD setup and have identified some "challenges" regarding user accounts in >/etc/passwd and in AD. >> >> Let me explain today's situation. Today we use a Linux file server that serves for both Linux and Windows clients and that
2008 Oct 26
4
odd behaviour of identical
given what ?identical says, i find the following odd: x = 1:10 y = 1:10 all.equal(x,y) [1] TRUE identical(x,y) [1] TRUE y[11] = 11 y = y[1:10] all.equal(x,y) [1] TRUE identical(x,y) [1] FALSE y [1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 length(y) [1] 10 looks like a bug. platform i686-pc-linux-gnu arch i686 os linux-gnu system
2019 Jun 11
2
NT_STATUS_ADDRESS_NOT_ASSOCIATED error msg on DC boot
Hi, after rebooting the AD DC i regularly get NT_STATUS_ADDRESS_NOT_ASSOCIATED and - as a consequence - task_server_terminate: [XXXd failed to setup interfaces] error messages in log.samba (I removed a couple of "samba: setproctitle not initialized, please either call setproctitle_init() or link against libbsd-ctor." lines for better readability): [2019/06/11 09:23:47.400171, 0]
2020 Jun 25
2
Renaming passes
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 9:59 AM Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 7:48 PM Arthur Eubanks via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > After talking with some NPM people, I believe the ultimate goal after > NPM is enabled by default is to only support `-passes=`, and remove support > for `-foo-pass`. > Hm,
2008 Aug 14
1
AMI and extensions.conf
Hello I'm looking for a wayy to modify extensions.conf It seems that PutConfig AMI command is not supposed to work on extensionsq.conf Any ideas? Thanks Vadim
2019 Oct 07
2
Shift-by-signext - sext is bad for analysis - ignore it's use count?
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 11:32 AM Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri at gmail.com> wrote: > > Bump. Any further thoughts here? > > To recap - i don't really see how this can be a demandedbits problem - we do > demand all those bits, we just know they must be zero. > (i would love to be proven wrong though!) > > Roman. > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 11:17 PM Roman Lebedev
2020 Mar 17
2
[cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues
On 03/17/2020 06:39 AM, Roman Lebedev wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 4:35 PM Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On 03/16/2020 11:09 PM, Roman Lebedev wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 6:07 AM Tom Stellard via cfe-dev >>> <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 03/16/2020 10:13 AM, Florian Hahn wrote:
2020 Mar 20
2
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues
Please can we shut down one of the two systems for new bugs ASAP? We've already had an instance of someone filing the same bug using both systems, with two different fixes being committed by two different people at the same time... On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 06:49, Robinson, Paul via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From:
2018 Dec 18
2
should we do this time-consuming transform in InstCombine?
Hi Roman, Thanks for your good idea. I think it can solve the abs issue very well. I can continue with my work now^-^. But if it is not abs and there is no select, %res = OP i32 %b, %a %sub = sub i32 0, %b %res2 = OP i32 %sub, %a theoretically, we can still do the following transform for the above pattern: %res2 = OP i32 %sub, %a ==> %res2 = sub i32 0, %res Not sure whether we can do it
2020 Jul 09
2
[RFC] carry-less multiplication instruction
05.07.2020, 05:22, "Roman Lebedev" <lebedev.ri at gmail.com>: > On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 12:18 PM Shawn Landden via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>  Carry-less multiplication[1] instructions exist (at least optionally) on many architectures: armv8, RISC-V, x86_64, POWER, SPARC, C64x, and possibly more. >> >>  This proposal is to add a
2019 Jan 31
6
[cfe-dev] [Github] RFC: linear history vs merge commits
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 8:29 PM David Greene via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> writes: > > > What is the practical plan to enforce the lack of merges? When we > > looked into this GitHub would not support this unless also forcing > > every change to go through a pull request (i.e. no pre-receive hooks >