similar to: Contributing to Samba: Samba now accepts corporate copyright.

Hi all, Some history. Samba has historically only accepted code with personal, not corporate copyright attached. There were a couple of good reasons for this in the past, one of which was that we preferred GPL enforcement decisions to be made by individuals, not by corporations. Under GPLv2, a license violator loses all rights under the license and these have to be reinstated by the copyright

Hi Everyone, I’d like to start a discussion about how to improve some important issues we have in the LLVM community, regarding our license and patent policy. Before we get started, I’d like to emphasize that *this is an RFC*, intended for discussion. There is no time pressure to do something fast here -- we want to do the right long-term thing for the community (though we also don’t want

> On Nov 1, 2016, at 12:21 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 09:16:47AM -0700, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote: >> The goals of this effort are outlined in the previous email but, in short, we aim to: >> - encourage ongoing contributions to LLVM by preserving low barrier to entry for contributors.

Samba adopts GPLv3 for future releases. --------------------------------------- After internal consideration in the Samba Team we have decided to adopt the GPLv3 and LGPLv3 licences for all future releases of Samba. The GPLv3 is the updated version of the GPLv2 license under which Samba is currently distributed. It has been updated to improve compatibility with other licenses and to make it

Samba adopts GPLv3 for future releases. --------------------------------------- After internal consideration in the Samba Team we have decided to adopt the GPLv3 and LGPLv3 licences for all future releases of Samba. The GPLv3 is the updated version of the GPLv2 license under which Samba is currently distributed. It has been updated to improve compatibility with other licenses and to make it

> > > > I’m still not completely convinced by this argument, given that the > majority of patent lawsuits come from NPEs. That is not necessarily where the majority of patent lawsuit *danger* comes from, and i'd argue, pretty strongly, it's not the most likely case for LLVM. > We’d still be in the situation where a malicious contributor could: > > 1. Spin up a

Hi I am about to migrate our corporate network from NT to Samba and Linux. But I have stumbled upon a problem : How do I transfer the files from NT to Samba and preserve the ownership? The users will be using the same usernames as before. Are there a script or program, that can transfer these rights? Or is it the hard way? 20Gb of data, nearly 100000 files. Regards Jacob

Hi all, Now that we’ve settled on the license legalese to get to, we need to start the process of relicensing. We’re still sorting through all of the details of what this will take, but the first step is clear: new contributions to LLVM will need to be under both the old license structure and the new one (until the old structure is completely phased out). From a mechanical perspective, this is

Hi Rafael, We’ve discussed why a license change is preferable over the span of several years now. I’m happy to explain over the phone, contact me off list and we can talk. -Chris > On Aug 10, 2017, at 8:33 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I still don't see any justification in the text why a license change is >

This has already been discussed extensively in the public. The threads are available in the archives. -Chris > On Aug 10, 2017, at 1:05 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > Sorry, but I really don't think a private conversation is appropriate > for such discussions. > > If the motive cannot be explained in public I have no choice

On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 08:39 -0500, asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com wrote: > Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 12:02:53 -0600 > From: Stephen Bosch <posting at vodacomm.ca> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Mushtaq Ahmed is out of the office. > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> > Message-ID:

> On Aug 10, 2017, at 2:59 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > I can find old threads about it, but nothing saying why it was decided > that contributor agreement wouldn't work. Care to send the URL? Here are some quick points that come to mind: 1. It raises the bar to contribution, because something must be “signed” before a

Ron Blok wrote: > Hi fellow icecast users, > > I get more an d more complaints from listeners who are trying to listen to > our stream behind a firewall. > It seams that more and more companies block port 8000 in their firewalls. > > Is there a solution for these cases ? I have somewhere read something about > streaming on port 80 instead of 8000. > Is this the

Start the REvolution without me... http://danesecooper.blogs.com/divablog/2009/10/start-the-revolution-without-me.html *From Danese Cooper's Blog* Some of you may have become aware of REvolution Computing<http://revolution-computing.com/>, a commercial open source company organized around the R Language<http://www.r-project.org/>, when I joined in March

Anyone use the LDAP feature yet on the polycom phones? If so how well does it work? How are you using it in your environment? http://polycom.com/usa/en/products/voice/desktop/soundpoint_ip/applicati ons/corporate_directory_access.html Roy Anciso Director of Technology Manistee Intermediate School District 772 East Parkdale Avenue Manistee, MI 49660 Ph: 231-723-4264 Fx: 231-398-3036 roy at

Dear r-useRs, After a couple of years in a 'R exile' of sorts, I've recently changed jobs and my current employer (an American multinational in the food manufacturing industry) is much more open than my past employer (which wouldn't even want to hear about anything that didn't begin with SAS...). So, after my insistence corporate IT is now considering adopting R as part of our

Dear r-useRs, After a couple of years in a 'R exile' of sorts, I've recently changed jobs and my current employer (an American multinational in the food manufacturing industry) is much more open than my past employer (which wouldn't even want to hear about anything that didn't begin with SAS...). So, after my insistence corporate IT is now considering adopting R as part of our

My company recently started using a R library from RCRAN that is licensed under the LGPL Version 2 or greater per the DESCRIPTION file, but contains no copy of the LGPL notice, or any copyright notice. I've grown accustomed to paying attention to copyright and licensing as a Debian package maintainer, and sent the author of the package an email expressing my concern. The author believed that

On 4/2/2016 11:07 AM, David Winsemius wrote: >> On Apr 1, 2016, at 5:01 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 01/04/2016 6:46 PM, Bert Gunter wrote: >>> ... of course, whether one **should** get them is questionable... >> They're just statistics. How could it hurt to look at them? > Like Rolf, I thought that this utterance

Hi R List, What is the place to search for *corporate version of R *including 1) GUI 2) Documentation 3) Cloud Computing or HPC Regards, Ajay Website- http://decisionstats.com Graduate Student University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Go Vols! [[alternative HTML version deleted]]