similar to: plot methods for summary of rms objects

Dear All, using the example from the help of summary.rms library(rms) n <- 1000 # define sample size set.seed(17) # so can reproduce the results age <- rnorm(n, 50, 10) blood.pressure <- rnorm(n, 120, 15) cholesterol <- rnorm(n, 200, 25) sex <- factor(sample(c('female','male'), n,TRUE)) label(age) <- 'Age'

I would like to incorporate multiple summary plots from the rms package into a single device and to control the titles, and also to open a new device when I reach a specified number of plots. Currently I am only getting a single "plot(summary(" graph in the upper left- hand corner of each successive device. However, in the rms documention I see instances of a loop being used with

Dear R-users, I am using R 2.13.0 and rms 3.3-0 , but can not reproduce figure 7.8 of the handouts *Regression Modeling Strategies* ( http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/wiki/pub/Main/RmS/course2.pdf) by the following code. Could any one help me figure out how to solve this? setwd('C:/Rharrell') require(rms) load('data/counties.sav') older <- counties$age6574 + counties$age75

Dear colleagues, I have a question regarding controlling the jitter when plotting predictions in the rms package. Below I've simulated some data that reflect what I'm working with. The model predicts a continuous variable with an ordinal score, a two-level group, and a continuous covariate. Of primary interest is a plot of the group by score interaction, where the score is the ordinal

Hi, in Design package, a plot of survival probability vs. a covariate can be generated by survplot() on a cph object using the folliowing code: n <- 1000 set.seed(731) age <- 50 + 12*rnorm(n) label(age) <- "Age" sex <- factor(sample(c('male','female'), n, TRUE)) cens <- 15*runif(n) h <- .02*exp(.04*(age-50)+.8*(sex=='Female')) dt <-

Hello all, I'm trying to plot the effects of variables estimated by a regression model fit individually, and for categorical predictors, the independent variable shows up on the y-axis, with the dependent variable on the x-axis. Is there a way to prevent this reversal? Sample code with dummy data: # make dummy data set.seed(1) x1 <- runif(200) x2 <- sample(c(1,2),200, TRUE) x3 <-

Hi! Does anyone know how to do the test for goodness of fit of a logistic model (in rms package) after running fit.mult.impute? I am using the rms and Hmisc packages to do a multiple imputation followed by a logistic regression model using lrm. Everything works fine until I try to run the test for goodness of fit: residuals(type=c("gof")) One needs to specify y=T and x=T in the fit. But

Hi everyone, I'm having some difficulty getting "simple effects" for the ols() function in the rms package. The example below illustrates my difficulty -- I'll be grateful for any help. #make up some data exD <- structure(list(Gender = structure(c(1L, 2L, 1L, 2L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 1L, 2L), .Label = c("F", "M"), class = "factor"),

I have a plot produced by function bplot (package = rms) that is really a lattice plot (class="trellis"). It is similar to this plot produced by a very minor modification of the first example on the bplot help page: requiere(rms) n <- 1000 # define sample size set.seed(17) # so can reproduce the results age <- rnorm(n, 50, 10) blood.pressure <- rnorm(n, 120,

Hello! I have created a bplot-figure using this code: *file <- "2dcali_red.ttt" ux<-as.matrix(read.table(file, dec = ",")) mode(ux)<-'numeric' vel<-ux[,1] ang<-ux[,2] x<-ux[,3] y<-ux[,4] dat<- data.frame(ang=ang, x=x,y=y) require(rms) ddist2 <- datadist(dat) options(datadist="ddist2") fitn <- lrm(ang ~ rcs(x,4) +

Dear R-users, I have used the nomogram function from the rms package for a logistic regresison model made with lrm(). Everything works perfectly (r version 2.15.1 on a mac). My question is this: if my final model is not the one created by lrm, but I internally validated the model and 'shrunk' the regression coefficients and computed a new intercept, how can I build a nomogram using that

Dear list, I'm currently trying to use the rms package to get predicted ordinal responses from a conditional ratio model. As you will see below, my model seems to fit well to the data, however, I'm having trouble getting predicted mean (or fitted) ordinal response values using the predict function. I have a feeling I'm missing something simple, however I haven't been able to

Hi All, I have a quick question about using plot.Predict now that the rms package uses lattice. I'd like to add tick marks along the regression line, which is given by data=llist(variablename) in the plot call. The ticks show up fine, but I'd like to alter the color. I know the ticks are produced by scat1d, but after spending a fair bit of time going through documentation, it still

Dear All, I wonder if someone can point me in the right direction here. I'm working with the rms library, R 2.9.2 under Windows XP. I'm trying to arrange two plots side by side for a colleague. mfrow or mfcol do not seem to work, however, so I am obviously missing something important. I know that there have been changes in the graphics from Design to rms, but am just not sure where to

Dear fellow R-users, I?m using the Glm function (gamma family of distributions) from the rms package to compare 2 groups on costs data. Although the summary function does provide the mean cost difference and standard errors, I believe these values were in the (natural) log ratio format. Is there a function to express these values into the original scale of the response variable (i.e., dollars)

Hi all! I've got this error while running example(Glm) library("rms") > example(Glm) Glm> ## Dobson (1990) Page 93: Randomized Controlled Trial : Glm> counts <- c(18,17,15,20,10,20,25,13,12) Glm> outcome <- gl(3,1,9) Glm> treatment <- gl(3,3) Glm> f <- glm(counts ~ outcome + treatment, family=poisson()) Glm> f Call: glm(formula = counts ~

I am cleaning up the rms package to not export functions not to be called directly by users. rms uses generic functions defined in other packages. For example there is a latex method in the Hmisc package, and rms has a latex method for objects of class "anova.rms" so there are anova.rms and latex.anova.rms functions in rms. I use:

Hi, Running the following example from ?Predict() throws an error I have never seen before: set.seed(1) x1 <- runif(300) x2 <- runif(300) ddist <- datadist(x1,x2); options(datadist='ddist') y <- exp(x1+ x2 - 1 + rnorm(300)) f <- ols(log(y) ~ pol(x1,2) + x2) p1 <- Predict(f, x1=., conf.type='mean') Error in paste(nmc[i], "=", if (is.numeric(x))

dear professor: thank you for your help,witn your help i develop the nomogram successfully. after that i want to do the internal validation to the model.i ues the bootpred to do it,and then i encounter problem again,just like that.(´íÎóÓÚerror to :complete.cases(x, y, wt) : ²»ÊÇËùÓеIJÎÊý¶¼Ò»Ñù³¤(the length of the augment was different)) i hope you tell me where is the mistake,and maybe i have

Hi, Using the latest rms package I am able to make nice plots of model predictions +/- desired confidence intervals like this: # need this library(rms) # setup data d <- data.frame(x=rnorm(100), y=rnorm(100)) dd <- datadist(d) options(datadist='dd') # fit model l <- ols(y ~ rcs(x), data=d) # predict along original limits of data l.pred <- Predict(l) # plot of fit and