similar to: Pigeon Sieve, redirect action and SPF

Hello, In the past (older dovecot versions) I've tuned the SQL "password_query" of our mail server so that when the user has the account blocked for some reason (expired, need password change, etc.) the query returns nologin=1 and a verbose reason like reason="Your account is expired please change the password" and it worked very well with IMAP clients. I'm now

Is this what you are looking for? https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/MailboxAlias It seems already be implemented... regards. On 2018/01/12 14:25, Tanstaafl wrote: > On Fri Jan 12 2018 01:29:37 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Steffen > Kaiser <skdovecot at inf.h-brs.de> wrote: >> On Thu, 11 Jan 2018, Joseph Tam wrote: >>> I'd like to configure my dovecot

On Fri Jan 12 2018 01:29:37 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at inf.h-brs.de> wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jan 2018, Joseph Tam wrote: >> I'd like to configure my dovecot service to use the IMAP SPECIAL-USE > well, in my experience SPECIAL-USE is just a suggestions to clients. Check > RFC 6154 for MUSTs, you'll find only few. Hence, how the client

Howdy, I'm looking for a good howto to have pigeon saving the sieve scripts on an mysql table. Can some point me to a good one? Dr. google doesn't show me much about it. Thanks in advanced, Jorge,

Stephan, I've recently been playing around with packaging dovecot 2.0 and dovecot-2.0-pigeonhole, as well as the --enable-header-install configure options of both. This lead me to the following question. Should pigeonhole's sieve binaries rely on static libstorage / other dovecot libraries? It seems like they should instead use shared libraries, but I couldn't find a configure option

Hi, I'm trying to compile dovecot-1.2-sieve-0.1.15 on a CENTOS 5 box. Using: ./configure --with-dovecot=/usr/local/etc and with: ls -Al /usr/local/etc/ total 100 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 49576 Apr 6 12:25 dovecot.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 410 Apr 6 12:25 dovecot-db-example.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 782 Apr 6 12:25 dovecot-dict-sql-example.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4986 Apr 6

How can I do this with Sieve? I have a script like this: if header :value "ge" :comparator "i;ascii-numeric" ["X-Spam-Score"] ["25"] { discard; stop; } elsif header :value "ge" :comparator "i;ascii-numeric" ["X-Spam-Score"] ["5"] { fileinto "Junk"; stop; } else {

Hi, all: I can't make my HP DL380 G2 servers to boot off local disk by using "default local" line in my PXE boot menu. For fully automated server setups, I have configured all my DL380 servers to always do PXE boot. By manipulating the default boot option in boot menu, I can control a server whether to install a new OS via kickstart or just boot off local disk. This scheme works

Dear Friends, i have setup SPF alright, postfix is performing check as well (results below), but even if there is no SPF record exist for a domain, message is still accepted. how can i set the reject action, if no SPF available. May 3 16:11:14 titan postfix/policy-spf[5353]: : SPF none (No applicable sender policy available): Envelope-from: somedomain.com Prabh S. Mavi

Your spf record is broken: dovecot.org. 39942 IN TXT "v=spf1 a -all" -- Jim Flowers <jflowers at ezo.net> -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

Dear Friends Greetings, i wish to setup SPF look up f0r Postfix on CentOS 6.2. I could not find any document on the net describing the procedure. is anyone have documentation i can follow to setup the SPF please? Thanks / Regards Prabhpal S. Mavi

I was spamassassin update spamassassin.i386 0:3.2.0-1.el4.rf Complete! and then,Require Perl-Package installed [30998] dbg: diag: module not installed: Mail::SPF ('require' failed) [30998] dbg: diag: module installed: Mail::SPF::Query, version 1.999001 [30998] dbg: diag: module installed: IP::Country::Fast, version 604.001 [30998] dbg: diag: module installed: Razor2::Client::Agent,

Hello Dovecot gurus, I've set up SPF checking on my postfix gateway and have confirmed that messages from domains set with hard fails that don't come from a good sender are rejected outright. Messages from domains set with a softfail that come from bad sources are tagged in the message header with "Softfail (domain owner discourages use of this host)", but end up in the

Does anyone have any experience with adding SPF support to sendmail?? Thank you, -ed-

There's no ambiguity here, if you send a message, you are the sender. The envelope from should be yours. On Sunday, 25/10/2020 at 11:48 Marc Roos wrote: Say someone has setup spf for his domain and sends an email to a user that has in roundcube enabled the sieve forward. If the message is forwarded without altering the message headers, this could result in a message being blocked or not

I know this is a bit off topic from CentOS itself, but are there any DNS experts that would be able to e-mail me on the side and assist with some questions I have regarding TXT/SPF records? I want to ensure my mail doesn't bounce.

What''s the directors'' take on ading DKIM or SPF functionality into ActionMailer. Is that a function that is better addressed via a plugin, or would an extension or a monkeypatch of this class be an appropriate avenue of pursuit? Steven --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on

On 14/6/20 8:07 am, Scott A. Wozny wrote: > Messages from domains set with a softfail that come from bad sources > are tagged in the message header with "Softfail (domain owner > discourages use of this host)", but end up in the user's Inbox, > anyway. I suppose I kind of figured DoceCot would see the SPF > softfail in the message header and automagically route that

I am inquiring about how to setup a proper SPF record. I know there are SPF wizards/generators available but each seem to have a different "opinion" of what should be included and what should not be included. Let me give you a scenario of my setup, and hopefully someone can help me out. My domain is: test.com My mailserver hostname is: mail.host.com which also has a MATCHING PTR

Say someone has setup spf for his domain and sends an email to a user that has in roundcube enabled the sieve forward. If the message is forwarded without altering the message headers, this could result in a message being blocked or not relayed, because sending hosts ip, is not in the spf of the from: domain. Possible solutions are: - add option if enabled, it replaces the From: with that