similar to: Hide INBOX prefix on shared mailboxes

hi everybody, got a strange issue with 1.2.4 on SLES11. When listing the user's available subscriptions with any client, every shared mailbox that can be subscribed is listed twice, once with it's correct name, 'folder' for example. the second appereance is without the last letter of the name, 'folde' for example. strange behaviour, since this happens with any client. i

Hi list, using dovecot in a more complex environment nearly always requires use of ACLs and shared mailboxes/folders. Now, to make life more easy for the users, we can use 'dovecot-shared' files to eable per-user \seen-flagging. Is it possible to make this issue configurable in the dovecot config, something like "always keep a 'dovecot-shared' file in users maildir, even if

Hi folks, i'm using 3.0.30 on Debian etch, one big share (~250 G) with a separate recycler, built with the vfs object. Files which are deleted are moved to that recycler, now my question: Are files that are copied/moved to another share also moved to the recycler? Thanks in advance, i.A. Hendrik Pahl Systemingenieur -- LWsystems GmbH & Co. KG ++ http://www.lw-systems.de/impressum

Hi, is it possible to compile dovecot 1.2.5 with the managesieve patch 0.11.9 which is for dovecot 1.2.4 or is it better to wait if a new managesieve patch is released? Maybe 1.2.5 will work too? Thanks, Seba

hi! i just have samba running with ldap backend for user authentication. and my problem is that i can access my samba shares but with the wrong user but i am in the right group Domain Users And i dont know where to start searching. I could post the logs in pastebin for example but you should tell me what log level to use ... Thanx, Daniel

Hy Samba users, I've got a problem with an samba/ldap setup. As I set an ACL to a domain group in an windows client, a group mapping entry will be created in the Idmap ou at the ldap server. I discoverd the OpenLDAP logfiles. There, the server sends a search request for the domain group sid to the ldap backend will retreive an entry back: Jan 15 20:19:24 225 slapd[4518]: conn=190 op=24

Hi list members, I've a problem with a printer in a samba network like the following client ----> samba dc ----> cups ----> network plotter Client: Windows XP Professional Samba: 3.0.20b on SLES 9, SP3 Cups: 1.1.20 Printer: HP DesignJet 1050C The plotter is installed as a windows network printer on the samba server. Cups is directly connected to samba:

On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Roman Levenstein wrote: >>> Wouldn't it be possible and even more clean to have just one >>> description like (I use a pseudo-description here): >>> >>> def MOVrr : I<0x88, MRMDestReg, (ops (GR8|GR16|GR32) :$dst, >>> (i8mem|i16mem|i32mem):$src), >>> "mov{b} {$src, $dst|$dst, $src}", []>,

Hi Chris, Thanks a lot for your answer! Chris Lattner wrote: >> 1. Why does X86 instruction set description provide different >> descriptions for the same instructions, which differ only in the size >> of operands? >> E.g. >> >> def MOV8rm : I<0x8A, MRMSrcMem, (ops GR8 :$dst, i8mem :$src), >> "mov{b} {$src, $dst|$dst, $src}",

i want to extend a burg-style code generator generator to write a retargetable compiler, implementing the algorithm: Rainer Leupers: Code Selection for Media Processors with SIMD Instructions. DATE 2000: 4-8 what i have now is only iburg, though robust but with very limited functionality. i have consider using "nova" - http://cocom.sourceforge.net/nona.html but it seems not be

I've been using Samba with OpenLDAP with great success on normal servers. Recently however, it appeared to us that for remote locations it is more economically viable to replace Samba servers with Samba running on little routers like ASUS WL-500g with openwrt firmware/software. It has a broadcom/mipsel CPU, and thanks to openwrt (http://openwrt.org), it is possible to run lots of software

On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Roman Levenstein wrote: > I'm trying to implement a new backend for an embedded CISC processor. > Therefore I thought that it makes sense to take X86 target as a basis, > to save some time. Ok. Note that the X86 backend is one of the most complex though, because it supports several subtargets and ABIs, which makes it more complex than some other targets. >

Hi, I'm trying to implement a new backend for an embedded CISC processor. Therefore I thought that it makes sense to take X86 target as a basis, to save some time. But when I look into the X86InstrInfo.td, I have a very strong feeling that it is one of the most complex instruction set descriptions compared to other targets. I can imagine that this is due to the complexity of X86's

[Sorry this is so long; I've tried to be thorough. Please CC: any responses to me, because I haven't gotten any messages from the Samba list in over 15 hours and am concerned something is awry with my subscription.] I have recently set up a Samba 3.0.1 PDC/BDC installation with LDAP master/slave. It has been mostly successful, however, there are a few niggling issues that remain.

Dear Samba Users, I've got a problem with the ID-Mapping at a Samba (3.0.22 / Ubuntu Dapper) Setup with an LDAP Backend. I do the following: 1. Access a samba share at a Samba member server from a windows client 2. Set an acl entry for a group of the domain. The group exists an the LDAP backend as a samba group. But the member server will create an idmap-Entry for this group. The acl

Am 05.03.2017 um 22:49 schrieb Peter: > On 04/03/17 00:22, Jakob Curdes wrote: >> Hello, we have a centos 6 server running dovecot 2.0 provided with the >> OS, currently 2.0.9. We would like to upgrade to the 2.2.19 package >> provided by the mailserver.guru repo. > > Why upgrade to such an old version? You can get 2.2.27 (2.2.28 in > testing) packages from

hi list, initial situation: SunOS alusol 5.11 snv_86 i86pc i386 i86pc SunOS Release 5.11 Version snv_86 64-bit 3 USB HDDs on 1 USB hub: zpool status: state: ONLINE NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM usbpool ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t0d0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t0d0p0

Hellou I found a interesting problem with my tinc instalation: Log messages from main router. tinc.vpn1[1959]: tincd 1.0pre7 starting tinc.vpn1[1959]: /dev/tun is a Linux tun/tap device tinc.vpn1[1959]: Can't bind to 0.0.0.0 port 655/tcp: Permission denied tinc.vpn1[1959]: Unable to create any listening socket! tinc.vpn1[1959]: Unrecoverable error #cat

hi guys, Given that we have the one man editorial ninja group in Alan and suppored by Timothy, I'd like to propose ( as a discussion point ) that we just bootstrap the Editor Group around them, give Alan the flag and grow it organically. Discuss :) - KB -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1827 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1827.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: c470c0139168de6ef581767dde439c8dbc2b196c897d14e8b5c6336b4f6f564c kdenetwork-4.10.5-8.el7_0.x86_64.rpm