similar to: Forcing users to change passwords

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 80000 matches similar to: "Forcing users to change passwords"

2003 Dec 11
1
Forcing Users to change passwords.
Hi, Samba-3 with LDAP backend is capable in this. I'm using it and it works. All you have to do, is to use LDAP and set proper account policies: $ pdbedit -P "bad lockout attempt" -C 5 (after 5 wrong password, user account will be locked out - samba sets password hashes to ***NOPASSWORD*** and user is unable to logon). $ pdbedit -P "min password length" -C 9 # password
2006 Apr 14
2
Master Password not working
Trying to get the master password to work. What am I doing wrong? Trying this test: /etc/dovecot.masterusers master:{plain}test auth_master_user_separator=* auth default_with_listener { mechanisms = plain passdb passwd-file { # Master users that can log in as anyone args = /etc/dovecot.masterusers master = yes #pass =yes } passdb passwd-file { # Path for
2004 Sep 20
1
unable to load shared library "/home/hpc1367/runs/taper/taper.so"
I am trying to load a .so file and get the following error message: > dyn.load("taper.so",local=F) Error in dyn.load(x, as.logical(local), as.logical(now)) : unable to load shared library "/home/hpc1367/runs/taper/taper.so": ld.so.1: /usr/local/lib/R/bin/R.bin: fatal: relocation error: file /home/hpc1367/runs/taper/taper.so: symbol f90_init: referenced symbol not
2004 Oct 29
1
problem building an R package under Windows XP with calls to NAG C routines
Hello all, I was able to create R packages under windows XP in the past using the dynamic NAG C library for windows XP (Mark 6). Recently, I changed computers and I am now using the static NAG C library for windows XP (Mark 7) to create a simple R package (called "test") which simply returns random numbers simulated using repetitive calls to a NAG C routine (uniform random
2006 Aug 31
0
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: >> It doesn't to me. If you set F95_DIR to /work/NAG_f95 things will >> probably work much better for you. > > No, that doesn't seem to be the problem. If I provide the additional > --with-f95 option with the correct directory to configure, > I still get the same errors (although it mentions /work/NAG_f95/lib/ >
2012 Oct 03
8
Advanced dovecot tricks - spam review/release
Hi, I'm looking for some advice to do a really advanced trick with Dovecot. I'm not sure if this can be done. I need to describe first. I have a spam filtering company that does front end spam filtering. (Junk Email Filter) I want to add a system where I store a copy of spam on a server and make it available to the customer to review and maybe resent on false positives. I know I
2017 Jun 15
1
How to expand Replicated Volume
Hi Nag Pavan Chilakam Can I use this command "gluster vol add-brick vol1 replica 2 file01g:/brick3/data/vol1 file02g:/brick4/data/vol1" in both file server 01 and 02 exited without add new servers. Is it ok for expanding volume? Thanks for your support Regards, Giang 2017-06-14 22:26 GMT+07:00 Nag Pavan Chilakam <nag.chilakam at gmail.com>: > Hi, > You can use add-brick
2005 Aug 26
2
Dovecot Virtual Users & Sendmail
Not directly Dovecot, but a configuration problem. We have a working set-up with Dovecot+Procmail+Sendmail, using POP-before-SMTP. We want to be able to offer email accounts to some local schools, using SquirrelMail (keeps their costs & maintenance down). The whole arrangement is working, but we don't want to have to have 300+ School children as users of our Red Hat Enterprise server,
2006 Aug 31
2
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
On 31 Aug 2006, at 19:13, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > >> When I adjust the settings in Makefile.nagfortran as follows, I'm >> able to get bytecode file for lucas, galgel and facerec, but make >> still quits with an error (after generating >> bytecode files for 7 (out of 26) benchmarks. >> >> Also, the file
2008 Oct 31
1
[LLVMdev] Several questions about LLVM
Eduardo Brito wrote: > The only fortran to C compiler that I know of, only accepts Fortran 77. > Fortran 90, 95 and up, aren't supported by any tool... > We have a commercial FORTRAN to C tool from NAG; I believe it supports Fortran 95 and maybe even later versions. Their website is at http://www.nag.co.uk (http://www.nag.com for North America). -- John T. > John Criswell
2005 Jul 17
1
Authentication feature I need
OK - here's whay I need to make it work for my Linuxconf compatible authentication system. First - a question: Will this work? I can find docs on "virtualfile. auth virtualfile { mechanisms = plain digest-md5 userdb = passwd-file /etc/vmail/passwd.%d passdb = passwd-file /etc/vmail/shadow.%d user = root } Then - since the dmain name selects the passwd file, if there were a
2006 Sep 01
0
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
On 01 Sep 2006, at 10:05, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > >> >>> Also, it is possible to tell make only to compile benchmark X? How >>> can I >>> enforce this? >> >> Go into the directory for that benchmark, then run 'make' or >> whatever. > I tried tom compile each of the SPEC CPU2000 benchmarks using the make command is each respective
2016 Jun 08
3
password expire warning for dovecot users in IMAP/POP login
Alec-san, Thanks for your comment. Please lemme make sure one more thing. >IMAP has ALERT response which is supported by some clients. To make it happen, no need to add any other configurations on LDAP end once possword policy is correctly set? Thanks, Masaharu Kawada On 2016?06?08? 17:27, A.L.E.C wrote: > On 06/08/2016 10:05 AM, mkawada at redhat.com wrote: >> Whatever ways
2006 Nov 08
4
[LLVMdev] Fortran and LLVM
Hi all, I'm looking into using LLVM to do some optimisations of Fortran code. As part of this, I've been trying to build the frontend with f95 support. At the moment, I'm trying to resolve undefined symbol problems for code defined in c-common.c + elsewhere - I'm taking the temporary approach of copy-pasting it into a new file, and linking that in. I have no idea if it will
2005 Dec 16
4
Dovecot Version Numbers - Let's drop the Alpha?
I'd like to make a suggestion. Let's drop the Alpha and come out with an official version 1.0. Here's my reasons. The 0.9x version are obsolete and people should be using the 1.0 Alpha versions which seem to me to do everything the previous versions did and more. It's as full featured and stable as all other IMAP servers and in my opinion is ready to be called 1.0. The
2006 Sep 01
0
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > Some problems were solved, new ones arised... Getting closer though... > The fixes for the previous problems are at the bottom of this email, > bug reports will be submitted when all problems are solved. Kenneth, In general, I am more than happy to help people on this list. It is good for the community and I enjoy helping people be successful
2006 Sep 01
2
[LLVMdev] compiling the full SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode
Hello, Some problems were solved, new ones arised... Getting closer though... The fixes for the previous problems are at the bottom of this email, bug reports will be submitted when all problems are solved. +++ New/remaining problems +++ Currently, 9/26 benchmarks compile and run succesfully. One (fma3d) still has a f95 related problem (see below). The other 16 are divided into two groups:
2018 May 21
1
Dovecot blacklist?
Or you can implement a policy server yourself. :)The protocol is not complicated, json over http. See?https://wiki.dovecot.org/Auth/Policy ---Aki TuomiDovecot oy -------- Original message --------From: Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> Date: 21/05/2018 19:13 (GMT+02:00) To: Marc Perkel <marc at perkel.com>, dovecot at dovecot.org Subject: Re: Dovecot blacklist?
2005 Jul 31
5
Dovecot Deliver?
I guess Dovecot has an LDA called deliver. What is it and how do I use it? Or is it ready to be used. can't find any docs on it. -- Marc Perkel - marc at perkel.com Spam Filter: http://www.junkemailfilter.com My Blog: http://marc.perkel.com
2006 Nov 25
0
[LLVMdev] f95 problem with SPEC2K
On 25 Nov 2006, at 09:02, Reid Spencer wrote: > Anyone know what to do about this: > > make[4]: Leaving directory `/proj/llvm/llvm-test-1/External/SPEC/ > CFP2000/173.applu' > make[4]: Entering directory `/proj/llvm/llvm-test-1/External/SPEC/ > CFP2000/178.galgel' > /usr/bin/f95 -w -S -O2 /opt/spec/CPU2000v1.3.1/benchspec// > CFP2000/178.galgel/src/modules.f90