similar to: init-script update for v2.0

On 02/04/16 20:59, Sonic wrote: > On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: >> On debian there is a script called samba in /etc/init.d , it starts smbd & >> nmbd *or* samba, if it doesn't find 'server role = active directory domain >> controller' in smb.conf , it doesn't try to start the samba deamon. > Odd that

Hi, I am running Tinc on debian squeeze, when I reboot, the tincd daemon is not running at all, despite having the right link in rc2.d: root at box /etc/rc2.d [9]# ls S03tinc* S03tinc When I do /etc/init.d/tinc start, it works fine. Any idea what is the problem? Best, -- Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org> FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after

Hello, Probably problem is numer 3... see below.... All of them are running after restart of computer: # /etc/init.d/samba-ad-dc status ● samba-ad-dc.service - LSB: start Samba daemons for the AD DC Loaded: loaded (/etc/init.d/samba-ad-dc) Active: active (running) since Son 2015-10-04 23:14:36 CEST; 18h ago # /etc/init.d/samba status ● samba-ad-dc.service - LSB: start Samba daemons for

Hi again, I refer to https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_a_Samba_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller#Testing_your_Samba_Domain_Controller Thank you for this great wiki! I run all the tests and everything looks perfect! I encounter just a little difference here. Actually I thought that there should be no Master and Workgroup for a AD DC. (as given in the wiki and in Stefan Kania's book

On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 5:54 AM, Garrison Venn <gvenn.cfe.dev at gmail.com> wrote: > If the powers at be want this, I could easily transform the source to the LLVM coding standards, and add > the necessary portable UNIX support--someone else would have to add non-UNIX support although the > System library probably helps with this. However I'm guessing the LLVM release flux of the

If the powers at be want this, I could easily transform the source to the LLVM coding standards, and add the necessary portable UNIX support--someone else would have to add non-UNIX support although the System library probably helps with this. However I'm guessing the LLVM release flux of the exception system, along with a lack of universal platform, dwarf JIT support might be a hinderance in

Package: xcp-squeezed Version: 1.3-13 Severity: serious User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install due to incorrect dependencies in the init.d LSB header. Some debian notes are available from at http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): Selecting

In lib/gcc_personality_v0.c, I believe the type of the exception_cleanup member of the struct _Unwind_Exception is incorrect. It has a return type of _Unwind_Reason_Code versus a return type of void as specified in http://refspecs.freestandards.org/abi-eh-1.21.html, and as can be seen in unwind.h on Linux, and OS X 10.6.x (the latter's unwind.h is under the Developer directory tree). The

Dearest list, I am using dovecot with heartbeat-2 and I noticed that the init scripts in the Debian packages from http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/ do not conform to the LSB standard: http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.1.1/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/iniscrptact.html E.g. the return code for "program is not running" is not 3. Is there is special reason for this? Cheers Jan --

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! I have been in discussion with several other accessibility projects to work on a common API for speech synthesis and speech recognition drivers. I suggested to discuss this on a mailing list and to found a new list at freedesktop.org for this purpose. Since there are also a number of other accessibility related areas where cooperation is

I''ve migrated my Dom0 host to Xen 4.2.0 + xl toolstack. With ''xm'' toolstack, configs in /etc/xen/auto are autostarted, assuming xend/xendomains services are started. IIUC, when using xl toolstack, those services are not to be started; and, afaict, the installation process for 4.2 has them disabled by default. Now, the configs in /etc/xen/auto are simply ignored. I

Hi Jim, I didn't use any documents, but intensively looked at gcc's output. I think this document: http://refspecs.freestandards.org/elf/elfspec_ppc.pdf is the last specification of the ABI. Cheers, Nicolas Jim Laskey wrote: > Nicolas, > > Would you point me to the Linux/PPC ABI documents you are using so I > can better judge what your restrictions are? These changes

On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > I compile Samba myself and I use init files, I would rather have them than > the bloat systemd comes with. They are not complex if you understand bash > and are a lot easier to understand than all that systemd comes with. At first I felt the same way but the service files are starting to seem simpler. Yes,

From: Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob at suespammers.org> > There is nothing wrong with using X11 at runlevel 3. The only thing > that can't be present is a display manager (KDM, XDM, GDM etc). That's _exactly_ what I'm talking about. Run-level 3 starts xdm. Several Linux distros use 2 for multi-user, 3 for multi-user w/X. Run-level 2 as multi-user w/o networking or w/o NFS was

Nicolas, Would you point me to the Linux/PPC ABI documents you are using so I can better judge what your restrictions are? These changes also have an effect on debugging and exception handling. Cheers, -- Jim On 2-Feb-07, at 08:58 AM, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have almost completed the implementation of a linux/ppc backend > in llvm. There were a few

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 3.0+hg11292-2 Tags: patch User: initscripts-ng-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: incorrect-dependency When testing dependency based boot sequencing, I discovered a bug in the init.d script for xen-utils-common. It is set to stop in the boot "runlevel" (S), but no script should stop there. Also, xend only depend on $local_fs, but

Hi, I have a machine with a Debian Stable installation that runs OpenVSwitch to connect a virtual machine on the same box. The machine is also running shorewall. The problem that I''m having is that shorewall try to run before openvswitch, this makes that shorewall fails because it can''t determine the IP of the virtual interface generated by openvswitch that start after

HI, Is there an init script to start stop tinc tinc-1.1pre10 for debian. I am running tinc -n name --pidfile /dir/name start from /etc/rc.local sometimes it's not creating the pid file but I see the process running. It would be great if we can manage it from /etc/init.d/ Thanks Anil -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi! I have compiled and installed tinc 1.1pre5 on a ubuntu machine. With the tinc 1.0.x version that is included in the ubuntu repository I am used to having the config files in /etc/tinc/ and where each vpn has a own directory. The file nets.boot placed in /etc/tinc where I can specify which vpn tunnels that is going to start automatically. How can I get the vpn tunnels to start automatically

OK, can someone tell me what utterly moronic thing I am doing wrong? I have two roughly identical Linux system running NUT, and one works properly. The other almost does. The second system works well once everything is up, but after booting, the system does not have connectivity to the UPS. I have to manually run `upsdrvctl start backup`, `/etc/init.d/nut start`, and `upsd` to get NUT