similar to: Users with large (4GB) inboxes crippling dovecot

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Users with large (4GB) inboxes crippling dovecot"

2007 Feb 21
2
Dovecot on Solaris x86?
I'm trying to get dovecot working on Solaris x86. I've got it working just fine on RH Desktop 4; and while I have a built, limping version on solx86, it's not actually usable except from other solx86 systems. Basic details: Version 1.0rc23 OS Solaris x86 (64 bit) CPU Opteron Filesystem NFS (but it's
2008 Oct 11
5
[LLVMdev] C++ to C?
Hi Michael, On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Michael McDonnell < michaeldmcdonnell at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > My assumption has been that LLVM generates machine code for a virtual > machine, and that you supply an interpreter that will execute the code. > The name can be somewhat confusing. LLVM is a lot of things, the web page gives some important areas (http://llvm.org/).
2012 Aug 28
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Resurrecting the C back-end
On 28.08.2012 14:08, Joshua Cranmer wrote: > On 8/27/2012 9:57 PM, Hongbin Zheng wrote: >> I think the C backend also allow people performing source-to-source >> transform with LLVM (instead of Clang). > > I do not believe that this would be the case nor that it should be a > goal. Source-to-source transformation requires a lot of accurate > information about the AST,
2007 Dec 11
1
Group inboxes
Please help, i want made "Group Inboxes" like in MDaemon "Group Inboxes: Customer service organizations often use group inboxes to receive email requests. Everyone in the customer service group has read and write access to the collective incoming mailbox. In this manner, anyone in the group can respond to each incoming email." Is it possible? Public folder is not work like i
2008 Oct 11
0
[LLVMdev] C++ to C?
Hi Daniel,   Thanks for your help.   You mentioned that "the current interpreter makes no pretense of running on a "virtual machine"", but isn't the interpreter itself a virtual machine? I'm not looking to emulate any particular processor - just interested in a tool that will help teach how a processor works.   Can LLVM help, or am I completely off track?   Thanks, M.
2005 Aug 06
1
auth_passdb using MySQL fails at starup
I've got dovecot v0.99.14, MySql 4.1.11 and postfix on fedora core 4. when using uxix socket I get: dovecot-auth: MySQL: Can't connect to database vmail: Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock' (13) when using tcp socket I get: dovecot-auth: MySQL: Can't connect to database vmail: Can't create TCP/IP socket (13) * the
2012 Aug 28
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Resurrecting the C back-end
I think the C backend also allow people performing source-to-source transform with LLVM (instead of Clang). ether On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk at spth.de> wrote: > Will this allow users to compile C++ (or some other language that LLVM > has a frontend for) to C, which then can be compiled using a C compiler > for a target architecture, for which only
2006 Jun 22
2
2nd Question on v1.0 setup and maildir
_____ From: Patrick Carney [mailto:patrick at castandcrew.com] Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 8:55 AM To: 'dovecot at dovecot.org' Subject: Question on v1.0 setup and maildir Hello all. I appreciate the responses to my problem on v0.99.14. Thank you all. We have built a new server running version 1.0-0_15.beta9.el4. The mail delivery agent is sendmail. We seem to have
2009 Dec 14
2
Dovecot truncating Inboxes?
Hi, Environment: >10000 Users (LDAP) Solaris 10 / sparc imap: dovecot-1.1.10 (pam-unix, no direct LDAP access) pop: dovecot-1.0.14 on another server (pam-unix, no direct LDAP access) mta: postfix (pam-unix, no direct LDAP access) procmail (pam-unix, no direct LDAP access) Filesystems: Inboxes and IMAP-home are on two different SAM-FS volumes. Problem description: Inboxes of users are
2004 Oct 22
6
How to save a complete image of the current state of R ?
Hello, I like to save the complete state of R, i.e. including all environments, objects/workspaces, loaded packages etc.. This wish has arisen since I am not able to reproduce an error which occurs when running R CMD check. Many thanks for your advice in advance. Best Regards Andreas
2013 Apr 05
2
Sync errors trying to sync old mbox inboxes to dovecot
We are currently running dovecot 2.2.rc3. I am trying to 'dsync mirror' old Qpopper/mbox inboxes to our new Dovecot/mdbox servers. For most of the several thousand accounts, it works without issue. But there are a handful of accounts that are generating the following errors. dsync(joe): Error: Sync failed for mbox file /var/opt/migrate/users/joe/inbox: seq=981 uid=981 uid_broken=0
2009 Feb 05
3
The Origins of R AND CALCULUS
An amusing afterthought : What is a rival software (ahem!) was planting this, hoping for a divide between S and R communities.or at the very minimum hoping for some amusement. an assumption or even a pretense of stealing credit is one of the easiest ways of sparking intellectual discord Most users of softwares don't really care about who gets credit ( Who wrote Windows Vista ,or Mac OS or
2007 Sep 18
1
What's the best way to authenticate against Active Directory?
Hi all, I'm working on a replacement for a legacy linux mail server: courier POP/IMAP, Postfix, OpenLDAP. One of the requirements of the new mail server is to authenticate against our AD infrastructure (I'll still keep a userdb in OpenLDAP). SSO is not required since most of the clients don't log into our domain. The current system has about 1,000 concurrent users on it during
2011 Dec 15
1
error starting R-devel with --arch ppc -- "an unusual circumstance has arisen"
When I try and start R-devel as follows: R --vanilla --arch ppc I see this, over and over again, ^C does not interrupt it and I have to close the terminal window: > Error in paste0(prefix, conditionMessage(e), "\n") : not a BUILTIN function In addition: Warning message: An unusual circumstance has arisen in the nesting of readline input. Please report using bug.report() >
2017 Jun 29
3
Just a quick heads up -- removing BBVectorize from LLVM (and Clang)
If you don't use BBVectorize at all, you can ignore this. Hal suggested this in a thread in 2014: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2014-November/079091.html None objected then, and I don't think any new uses have arisen so I plan to just remove it. It is causing maintenance burden, complexity, and is a set of features I'd rather not port to the new PM. Just an FYI email to
2004 Aug 06
2
External authentification-module for listening to icecast2-streams?
On 7 May 2003 at 20:14, Michael Smith wrote: > On Wednesday 07 May 2003 19:34, Stefan Neufeind wrote: > > Hi, > > > > today we came across the idea of adding an external > > authentification- module for listening to icecast2. There have > > recently been talks with artists and music labels that they would > > like to receive "a small fee" per
2005 Apr 26
2
Shared mailboxes and accessing MailDir not through IMAP
Hello, I'm testing Dovecot that is part of Debian/sarge (v0.99.14-1). So far so good. I have migrated some mailboxes for testing with success and seems that everything works fine. One thing I do not figure out is, what to do about shared mailboxes, which are the very reason of searching for an alternative IMAP server, The Wiki states that there is some sort of shared mailboxes, based upon
2012 Aug 28
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Resurrecting the C back-end
On 8/27/2012 9:57 PM, Hongbin Zheng wrote: > I think the C backend also allow people performing source-to-source > transform with LLVM (instead of Clang). I do not believe that this would be the case nor that it should be a goal. Source-to-source transformation requires a lot of accurate information about the AST, and conversion to LLVM IR is way too lossy. Signedness, for example, is
2012 Aug 28
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Resurrecting the C back-end
On Aug 27, 2012, at 10:39 PM, Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk at spth.de> wrote: > On 28.08.2012 14:08, Joshua Cranmer wrote: >> On 8/27/2012 9:57 PM, Hongbin Zheng wrote: >>> I think the C backend also allow people performing source-to-source >>> transform with LLVM (instead of Clang). >> >> I do not believe that this would be the case nor that it should
2014 Dec 29
3
sites and subnets
We had a samba 4.1.9 AD DC running since July. We have 3 campuses and brought up a secondary AD at another campus. This setup seemed to be running as expected. We could see our primary AD DC authenticating requests fine. We could see the secondary AD authenticating requests as well at our second campus. Then we started experiencing bandwidth issues between our campuses. Our metro-etherlink