similar to: 1.0alpha5: fcntl() locking problem

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "1.0alpha5: fcntl() locking problem"

2017 Feb 02
6
Compiling Dovecot on Solaris 10
Hello, I am tying to compile Dovecot 2.2.27 on Solaris 10, and I get this error: test-ioloop.c: In function `test_ioloop_pending_io': test-ioloop.c:188: error: size of array `type name' is negative My configuration is like this: Install prefix . : /usr/local File offsets ... : 64bit I/O polling .... : poll I/O notifys .... : none SSL ............ : yes (OpenSSL) GSSAPI ......... : no
2008 Apr 01
2
Unknown internal error
Hello, I just found this message in our dovecot logfiles: "Disconnected: BUG: Unknown internal error" Should I worry about this ? There are no complaints yet (although it is not limited to one user). It seems to occur with different clients (Apple/MacOS mail, Windows/Thunderbird, Pine). We're running dovecot 1.0.10 on Solaris 10 with mboxes (NFS) and local index storage. There are
2008 Jan 25
3
symbolic links to root node
Hello, I have a question about the way Dovecot limits file system access. Currently we're using Dovecot 1.0.5 (Solaris 10). In some cases users have a symbolic link like "z: -> /" in their mail directory. As a result there are log entries like Jan 25 13:30:31 imap1 dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] IMAP(xyz):
2005 Feb 28
5
Too many open files, etc.
Hello, a few days ago I switched out UW-server installation to dovecot 0.99.14 (Solaris 9). There were a few client issues, but mostly the migration was ok. But I have still some questions/problems: +) dovecot-auth: ... PAM: pipe() failed: Too many open files I increased the max. number of open files. Is this normal behaviour, that more than 512 open files are needed ? +) we're using mbox
2005 Jun 14
2
1.0-test73
http://dovecot.org/test/ Two potentially dangerous changes: - mbox parser should now be able to handle CR+LF linefeeds. Hopefully doesn't break anything. - Some mail header parser changes. Hopefully doesn't break anything. And other stuff: - COPY shouldn't crash anymore with 64bit systems - If PAM modifies username, keep it - When auth workers died they leaked file
2011 Apr 18
4
Solaris hardware crypto engines
Hello, I tried to find out how about to use the hardware crypto engines under Solaris (Sun Fire T2000). It seems, that its not just a compilation issue: > For operations that are to be offloaded, it is necessary to restrict use to subset > of OpenSSL functions (the EVP_ functions) and explicitly indicate the use of the PKCS11 > engine; something like the following works for bulk
2006 Feb 15
2
Thunderbird 1.5 and dovecot 1.0 beta 3 problem
My mailhosting provider has been testing dovecot 1.0 beta 3 as a proxy server and they asked the customers if they would like to test it out and report any issues. I am using Thunderbird 1.5 (IMAP) and have been with this mailhosting company for two months and have no issues at all with their current setup which uses Perdition as their proxy servers. The problem(s) I am encountered have been
2005 Sep 26
1
1.0alpha3: fcntl() complaints?
Hi, Since installing 1.0alpha3 this morning, I've seen this syslog complaint a few times. Anything to worry about? A "server too busy" issue? imap(user): fcntl() failed with mbox file /var/mail/user: Resource temporarily unavailable Jeff Earickson Colby College
2017 Feb 03
2
Compiling Dovecot on Solaris 10
Hi, thank You for a reply, compiling with Solaris Studio 12.5 solved this case. Martin Preen <preen at informatik.uni-freiburg.de> ra??: > Hello, > I don't have problems building 2.2.27 on Solaris 10 > (using Sun Workshop compiler 5.11). > > The configuration is the same as your. > Maybe a compiler/version problem on your system ? > > Regards, > Martin >
2005 Feb 15
3
A few words about NFS please?
Hi, Could you say a few words about Dovecot and POP/IMAP to an NFS mounted filesystem? I thought I saw on the dovecot webpage that NFS is "no way" with 0.99 and "maybe" with 1.x. I was looking for the FAQ and couldn't find it. My setup is like so: My mail server is a Solaris 9 system, running sendmail/procmail, and qpopper POP. Mail is stored in mbox format. The
2005 Dec 22
1
alpha5: (message_body_search_ctx) assert
Hi, My second case of this assert, gdb analysis of the core dump attached. My setup: Solaris 9, dovecot built with gcc 4.0.2, mbox format, imap usage only. INBOX is NFS mounted from another Solaris 9 system, index files are local. Syslog complaint is: imap(user): file message-body-search.c: line 414 (message_body_search_ctx): assertion failed: (input->v_offset == part->physical_pos +
2005 Oct 20
2
alpha4 and zlib-plugin?
Hi, I saw the zlib-plugin reference in the alpha4 ChangeLog notes are searched the list for info about it. The only reference I found was from Timo back in March 2005. Questions: 1) Is this going to become a standard part of version 1.0? 2) Any plans or ability to make it read/write to a gzipped mailbox, or is this possible? Or will it always be read-only? 3) How does a mailbox get gzipped?
2005 Apr 12
2
assertion failed in 1.0-stable
Hello everybody, I get the following assertion error with dovecot 1.0-stable when accessing a large folder: file istream-raw-mbox.c: line 383 (istream_raw_mbox_get_body_size): assertion failed: (rstream->body_offset != (uoff_t)-1) There is no error when using dovecot 0.99.14. Any ideas ? Martin ----------------------------------------------------------------- Martin Preen, Universitaet
2009 Mar 18
2
panic in dovecot 1.1.12
Hello, with some mbox folders I got this error: Mar 18 14:48:12 imap2 dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.crit] Panic: IMAP(xyz): file charset-iconv.c: line 122: unreached I assume that this is related to the folder contents (and not the configration). What does that mean to me ? Martin --------------------------------------------------------------- Martin Preen, Universit?t Freiburg, Institut f?r
2007 Apr 06
2
mbox sync/lock issue, rc28 and later
Help! I just noticed this error this morning, we have been getting a lot of these in rc28 and rc29, not in rc27 or before: Apr 6 07:22:52 karst dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] IMAP(jaearick): mbox file /var/mail/j/jaearick was modified while we were syncing, check your locking settings Pine coughed up an internal error, no core dump, and dovecot basically doubled the size of my mailbox by
2005 Dec 21
3
Another "Too many files open" post
I'm running Solaris 9 Sparc with Dovecot alpha 5 and using maildir format.. I noticed in the log file the following error: dovecot: Dec 20 15:54:18 Error: imap(xxxxxxxx): open(/export/home/xxxxxxxx/mail/.Sent Messages/cur/1135013649.002916.mbox:2,Sab) failed: Too many open files I called the guy and asked him what he was doing... synching his folders. It hung for a while but finally
2003 Jan 31
1
svm regression in R
Hallo, I have a question concerning SVM regression in R. I intend to use SVMs for feature selection (and knowledge discovery). For this purpose I will need to extract the weights that are associated with my features. I understand from a previous thread on SVM classification, that predictive models can be derived from SVs, coefficiants and rhos, but it is unclear for me how to transfer this
2005 Feb 02
1
assertion failed in imap-bodystructure.c
Hello, I'm currently testing dovecot/imap (Version 0.99.13). I found this in the log: imap(xxxxx): [ID 265587 mail.crit] file imap-bodystructure.c: line 278 (part_parse_headers): assertion failed: (part->physical_pos >= input->v_offset - start_offset) dovecot: [ID 684838 mail.error] child 7376 (imap) killed with signal 6 The user tried to setup a new folder (with Thunderbird)
2009 Mar 18
1
NFS-error with dovecot 1.1.12
Hello, I'm testing version 1.1.12 and occasionally there is Mar 18 14:40:44 imap2 dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] IMAP(xyz): nfs_flush_file_handle_cache_dir: rmdir(/home/xyz) failed: Device busy It seems that it is related to a crash of the previous imap process of that user. And it doesn't seem to cause any problems. So can it safely be ignored ? It is on Solaris 10. Index storage
2009 Mar 19
1
largefile question
Hello, currently we're using version 1.0.13 with 32bit file offsets. Is it safe to switch to a new version with largefile support enabled ? We want to reuse existing index/cache or do we have to expect errors with that ? Regards. Martin --------------------------------------------------------------- Martin Preen, Universit?t Freiburg, Institut f?r Informatik Georges-Koehler-Allee 52, Raum