similar to: error dropping root group priv

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3690 Bug ID: 3690 Summary: sshd: root [priv] process sleeping leads to unprivileged child proc zombie Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component:

Hello, I am new to TC and need some help with something that I need to do I have the following setup which works just fine but with a little problem. I need the user 172.16.1.100 in the case that it is using both classes never to exceed 256kbit now it goes up to 512kbit because both classes offer 256 each. How can I finally restrict this user to only 256kbit no matter what.

Hello. I'm not 100% sure if this is a configuration error on my side or a 'bad idea' on sshd/FreeBSD sides. A remote root ssh connection to a FreeBSD 4.10 server (with no remote root access) will allow you to 'work out' the root password. However, if you try the same against 5.2.1 FreeBSD, you have little chance. The following are pretty clear examples. If this is a config

I made a quick change to syslogd(8) so that it can drop root privileges immediately after starting up. It opens up the log sockets (UNIX and network domains) and writes the PID files before dropping privs. It drops privs before openning log files and writing to users. Therefore, you would need to modify your log file permissions appropriately. As for writing to users, ttys generally are writeable

The openSSH ssh command appears to not use a source privileged port (no matter what the options/configs) if the target port isn't a privileged port. For example: ssh -p 22222 foo.ucla.edu would never try to connect from a privileged port. Even with useprivilegedport=yes. This disallows .shosts RSA host authentication without a password. This breaks compatability with ssh-1.2.27 and

Problem: I have four networks, A, B, C, and D Networks B, C, and D should not be able to see each other. Network A should be able to see all of them. A - 172.16.1.1/24 B - 172.16.2.1/24 C - 172.16.3.1/24 D - 172.16.0.1/24 For host machine X, which is at 172.16.1.100/24 (network A), I added a route for it to ping a machine (Y) on the network B:     ip route add 172.16.2.0/24 via

hi, I''ve a dedicated internet link 512k with a cisco router, and now, I want to upgrade bandwidth with 8 ADSLs (512k each) then: - build kernel 2.4.27 with pachs: - patch-o-matic-ng-20040621 : CONNMARK, H323, etc... - http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#multigw Julian''s patch. - Activate "equal cost multi path" (Advanced Router-Networking Options) and so on -

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=296 Summary: Priv separation does not work on OSF/1 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: Alpha OS/Version: OSF/1 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

Provide private field for event handlers exclusive use. Convert nouveau_fence_wait_uevent() and nouveau_fence_wait_uevent_handler(); drop struct nouveau_fence_uevent. Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter at hurleysoftware.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/core/event.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c | 20 +++++++------------- 2 files changed, 8

Commit ea7dce901 ("drm/nv50/gr: print mpc trap name when it's not an mp trap") added an nv_error call that was missing the priv parameter. This causes GPFs if the error is ever hit. Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- Sorry, my bad! But... I hit it and it killed my computer. So things are probably even. drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/graph/nv50.c |

slightly reduce the amount of pointer chasing this needs to do. More importantly, this will easily generalize to virtio 1.0. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c index 6a7b8bf..7b82eb5 100644 ---

slightly reduce the amount of pointer chasing this needs to do. More importantly, this will easily generalize to virtio 1.0. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c index 6a7b8bf..7b82eb5 100644 ---

http://cvs-mirror.mozilla.org/webtools/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=296 mouring at eviladmin.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |weberc at grc.nia.nih.gov ------- Additional Comments From mouring at eviladmin.org 2002-08-16 07:24 -------

Hi, some time ago there was a patch introducing partial authentication for openssh. That feature allows to e.g. have a user identified by password AND key. We have an application, where we used that patch. But after the introduction of priv. seperation, it seems not to be a trivial task to port the patch. I did not find anything on that topic since so I am wondering, if anybody is working on

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=296 mouring at eviladmin.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |avi.koski at comverse.com ------- Additional Comments From mouring at eviladmin.org 2002-11-10 12:03 ------- *** Bug 429 has been

Hi List(s) A customer of mine reported that sftp didn't work for them. It seems to work just fine for me on that system, and after checking into it I noticed that the customer used psftp, while I use sftp from either cygwin or the linux version from openssh. The openssh version of sftp works in all cases, priv-sep on or off. However, the putty psftp breaks as soon as I turn on priv-sep

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540 Summary: sshd [priv] has PPID 1 and is killed by ^C in terminal Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.6p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=296 ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2003-05-12 18:42 ------- Can this bug be closed? The ChangeLog seems to indicate that it's been addressed. 20030320 [snip] - (bal) Disable Privsep for Tru64 after pre-authentication due to issues with SIA. Also, clean up of tru64 support patch by Chris Adams <cmadams at

Trying to get a lineage 2 private server working, I open it up and this error comes up: www.samzen.com/l2.png So I checked the terminal code and here's the errors: samzen at Samzen:~/.wine/drive_c/Program Files/Lineage II$ wine L2Gold.exe err:wineboot:ProcessWindowsFileProtection WFP: L"shdocvw.dll" error 0x7 err:wineboot:ProcessWindowsFileProtection WFP: L"urlmon.dll"

Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: > has anyone ever gotten lineage 2 to work in wine? You are looking in the wrong place. That's what we have AppDB for: http://appdb.winehq.org/appview.php?iAppId=2273