similar to: [OT] Is there a secure reverse IMAP proxy

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[OT] Is there a secure reverse IMAP proxy"

2009 Apr 24
3
1 Dovecot proxy to 2 real IMAP servers
Hello all. I have 2 Dovecot IMAP servers with different mailboxes. What serves different email domains. I want to add one Dovecot Proxy server and make him understand based on user domain - were it need to transfer a connection. I use LDAP auth based on "mail" attribute. It is possible? P.S. Proxy documentation at dovecot.org not help at all and seems to not complited. :-( --
2003 Nov 24
2
deliver mail with postfix to dovecot for mailinglists
This is a bit off topic on that list. But the question is required because of a limitation of dovecot. It cannot have shared mailboxes into which one would collect mailing list mails. I assume one has already solved that problem and therefore ask this question on that list. I try to do the following: I would like to setup an alias dovecot at kzone.ch and subscribe this alias to the dovecot
2010 Jul 17
2
dovecot 2.0rc2 Cannot delete a folder with Thunderbird (delete, not move to Trash)
With Thunderbird 3.1 I can now "delete" a folder which moves it to Trash. But I cannot remove the folder in Trash. The following is from the Thunderbird log file: 248[6814c00]: 8103800:imap.kzone.ch:A:SendData: 64 rename "test10" "Trash/test10" 248[6814c00]: 8103800:imap.kzone.ch:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: 64 OK Rename completed. 248[6814c00]:
2006 Mar 28
4
Setting a Default Domain
I'm working on migrating to Dovecot. At the moment, I have a mail path that includes the domain, so I'm using %d to get that. However, if users authenticate without specifying a domain (i.e. using "bob" instead of "bob at wiktel.com"), then %d expands to nothing. I'd like to have that expand to a default domain (wiktel.com) instead. Is that possible? Thanks,
2013 Apr 26
1
Slow DNS warnings (proxy/auth)
Hello, I've just finished transiting our proxies from perdition to dovecot (2.1.7-7 Debian). Yesterday 12 messages (all within the same second) like this caught my attention: --- Apr 25 17:19:09 pp11 dovecot: auth: Warning: proxy(redacted at gol.com,xx.xx.xx.xx,<26hUEivbfQBlMrMS>): DNS lookup for mb04.dentaku.gol.com took 5.002 s --- Now this machine at that time was handling a load
2006 Aug 09
4
IMAP/POP3 proxying and capability
Hi, I setup a rather large POP3/IMAP configuration and want to use dovecot proxying feature. I have noted that the capability announce when connecting via the proxies are not the same before you are authenticated and after. Before you are authenticated the proxy announce is own capability and after it announce the final server capability. The problem is that some (most ? all ?) mail client ask
2012 Oct 20
1
Dovecot 2 and TCP-Keepalive
Hi! I am about to migrate a perdition-based IMAP/POP3 proxy to Dovecot. Unfortunately some users are behind a firewall/NAT setup which throws away seemingly idle TCP connections sooner than the established default of 24 hours (more likely after 30 minutes ...) resulting in all kinds of weird client behavior. And unfortunately? this firewall/NAT setup is outside of my control and I have no means
2010 Sep 23
1
Does Director only work with dovecot proxy?
I was reading "conf.d/10-director.conf" and it mentions Dovecot proxy. I've been using perdition in the past for my pop/imap proxying needs and wasn't sure if Director could also use perdition or if it only works with Dovecots proxying. Thanks!
2012 Nov 26
2
IMAP proxy - can it detect parodying to itself?
Hi all, I have some IMAP servers fronted with separate perdition processes, and it would be ideal if I could collapse this down to having dovecot do both the IMAP proxying and the IMAP serving at the same time on the same IP addresses. One of the fields in my LDAP entries contains the canonical name of the server that hosts their mailbox, and if I follow the manual at
2007 Sep 05
2
securing dovecot proxy connections
The wiki <http://wiki.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase/ExtraFields/Proxy> page says this: "The connections created to the destination server can't be TLS/SSL encrypted.". Hrmm. Right now, with perdition, I'm forcing the use of STARTTLS on the internal connections. I'd just as soon get rid of perdition (to have one less moving part in my architecture), but I need the
2011 Mar 19
2
dovecot proxy, imapproxy, perdition . . . or?
Hi, I have two load-balanced dovecot servers using a single NFS mount. The version is 1.2.11. I chose this so that if one server goes down the other will take up the load, and if my load is too much for one server I just have to add more identical servers. It works, but I wish to move to SAN storage because the NFS server is exhibiting irregular performance. (I spent a lot of time with tcpdump to
2004 Feb 22
3
[OT] How is the Changelog file created?
How is the Changelog file created? I assume there is a tool which grabs this information from the CVS repository. What's the name of this tool? Sven
2007 Feb 03
2
IMAP/POP3 server with proxy feature
We are currently evaluating the migration from a proprietary, legacy mail server onto Dovecot for 20,000+ virtual domains. This is a big job and we intend to do it by initially proxying connections through to the legacy server, and moving customers over in batches by turning off the proxy feature for them. In the manual it states "This model is still a bit unfinished in current code"
2004 May 20
1
Why the name dovecot?
Why is docecot called dovecot? Actually, nobody likes these "rats with wings". ;-) Timo, can we know that or is it a secret? Sven
2006 Aug 04
1
Dovecot proxy in front of UWash?
Is it possible to use Dovecot frontends in front of UWash backends? I need a proxy pool ASAP. There is not sufficient time to migrate the backends for 40,000+ users so they have to stay UW for now. I have been looking at Perdition but concerned about performance under load. Dovecot looks really promising with it's non-forking mode. I need simple dumb frontends no local mail. Other
2004 Dec 19
3
Cannot access a file with Mulberry from a dovecot server if the mail does not end with a newline character.
I use Mulberry 3.1.6 on Windows to read my mails with dovecot 0.99.12 Solaris 9. There are some mail which I cannot read. When I try to open such a mail, dovecot quits and restarts (I can see that with ps, nothing is logged). The Mulberry log just looks like this: | --> #7.2300 Sun Dec 19 12:59:33 2004 | A00009 FETCH 695 (BODY.PEEK[1]) | * 695 FETCH (BODY[1] {61} | | --> #7.2300 Sun Dec 19
2010 Jul 17
2
dovecot 2.0rc2 [SERVERBUG] When trying to remove a folder which contains a subfolder
I'm going to risk to report something stupid again and waste resources... but [SERVERBUG] sounds like it should not happen. :) g create test g OK Create completed. h create test/test2 h OK Create completed. i list "test" "*" * LIST (\HasChildren) "/" "test" * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "test/test2" i OK List completed. j delete
2012 Jan 07
3
Providing shared folders with multiple backend servers
Hi *, I am currently in the planning stage for a "new and improved" mail system at my university. Right now, everything is on one big backend server but this is causing me increasing amounts of pain, beginning with the time a full backup takes. So naturally, I want to split this big server into smaller ones. To keep things simple, I want to pin a user to a server so I can avoid
2007 Jun 02
5
Is there a "connect acl" ?
Hi, I have been reading the acl documentation and it seems that a "connect acl" is not available. I need to limit the users that can login in an IP number, is that posible with dovecot 1.0? (i.e. only these users can login from the Internet) Or a new plugin should be written? It is complicated to do that? Thanks Oliver -- Oliver Schulze L. | http://tinymailto.com/oliver Asuncion
2011 Nov 30
4
MS Exchange IMAP Proxy
I need to make the IMAP interface of an Exchange 2000 server available on the net, however I would like to give it a little protection, and believe Dovecot's IMAP proxy might be appropriate. Does anybody have a *really simple* config that would allow IMAP pass-through to a single Exchange server? The examples I've seen all assume some sort of load balancing, which isn't an