similar to: CESA-2010:0723 Important CentOS 5 i386 kernel Update

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0723 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0723.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: de64ed82f6bbd5d31fcfa715f7062e46 kernel-2.6.18-194.17.1.el5.x86_64.rpm d2eba9bf61ec467c6912a402cdaf8743 kernel-debug-2.6.18-194.17.1.el5.x86_64.rpm

Hi. I just noticed I had a CentOS 5.3 system that I updated to CentOS 5.5 a few days ago, and I just ran "yum -y update" again to get the latest kernel, and I just noticed it still has the old 2.6.18-128 kernel instead of the new 2.6.18-194.17. What gives? /etc/grub.conf points at 2.6.18-194.17, but when I reboot, 2.6.18-128 comes up. Any suggestions? Thanks, -at myserver# yum -y

Hi, I was using kernel-2.6.18-164.15.1 with no known issues. Then, I updated to: Linux 2.6.18-194.17.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Sep 29 12:50:31 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I'm aware that there are later updates that patch couple more security bugs. Here is an issue I run with 2.6.18-194.17.1 and am asking if anyone hits that kernel bug. Here are the symptoms: 1) kswapd1 running at 100%,

Oct 8 22:30:42 sintek kernel: dovecot-lda[26943]: segfault at 0000000000000080 rip 00002b01b00bc880 rsp 00007fff3a7f1378 error 6 /var/log/audit/audit.log type=ANOM_ABEND msg=audit(1286461665.274:191): auid=500 uid=5000 gid=5000 ses=7 pid=22691 comm="dovecot-lda" sig=11 The mail system: <john-1 at sintek.info>: Command died with signal 11:

Hi, I found an architecture-specific segfault problem with the XML package. I originally found the problem using the parseKGML2Graph function in the Bioconductor KEGGgraph package, but as far as I can tell the underlying issue seems to be with the xmlTreeParse which is called by parseKGML2Graph. I'm trying this piece of code, from the xmlTreeParse help page: library(XML) fileName <-

I built and installed Lustre from source. When I installed built luster-modules- RPM, I got libcfs.ko from the kernel-2.6.18-prep has no modversions (the message is posted below), so it cannot be reused for kernel. Is there any procedure I need to do during the build? There is include/config/modversion.h under patched kernel, but the file does not have any contens and its size is 0. Thanks for

Upgraded the kernel to the latest, then tried to rebuild the proprietary Catalyst driver for a Radeon HD 4550 on a Dell Optiplex 980. The install dies, with a c error. Anyone else out there succeed in building one on the 2.6.18-194.17.1.el5-x86_64 kernel? I went to the ATI website, and the "installation instructions" include that it needs a) 32 bit software (which? dunno) and b) a

I have a Centos 5.5 on an AMD 64 system (Athlon II x2 250). I caught up on updates today, including -- kernel 2.6.18-194.17.1.el5 -- glibc 2.5-49.el5_5.5.i686 I have several guests that were working before the update, but now none of them will boot. With each attempt I get a message in /var/log/messages: -- kernel: qemu-kvm[xx]: segfault at 000000379fc0da11 rip 00002b9f2732283f rsp

I have installed CentOS 5.5 (2.6.18-194.17.1.el5PAE) on a number of Acer Veriton X498G desktop computers. They seem to randomly hang when nobody is logged in at the console, i.e. I notice a hanged computer but have not heard complaints about computers hanging while a user was at the keyboard. The symptoms are: Blank screen. Power LED on. Network LED blinking. No response to keyboard or

Hi, We are running on 5.5 on a HP ProLiant DL360 G6. Kernel version is 2.6.18-194.17.1.el5 (we had also tested with the latest available kernel kernel-2.6.18-238.1.1.el5.x86_64) We running some performance tests using the "iperf" utility. We are seeing very bad and inconsistent performance on the UDP testing. The maximum we could get, was 440 Mbits/sec, and it varies from 250 to 440

Hello again, I have an installation with dovecot and I am accessing it through linux mint and thunderbird v3.0.10 As thunderbird "subscribes" to dovecot, it does the following : Inbox Trash MyName at Mydomain.gr Local Folders Local Folders MyName at Mydomain.gr subfolder A Subfolder B Subfolder C Subfolder D Subfolder E Local Folders Outbox OK, I have to admit a have

I really could use some help. I have been using dovecot and qmail on Debian for years with no problems. I just replaced qmail with Postfix and have not been able to get messages to dovecot via deliver. I have tried to set it up as a virtual mailbox only "no lookup necessary" system following the vaious help pages. I am using just a single user vmail:mail to execute postfix and

Hi there, I got a new server with 2 AMD Opteron 6128, but when I''m booting on xen kernel (kernel 2.6.18-194.17.1.el5xen) with xen > 3.4.*, my server takes ~9 minutes to boot With Intel processor I don''t have any problem, anyone got this problem ? Thanks, Maxence BITTERLI http://www.sweetweb.fr @dgamax _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

Hello people, Well, what the subjects says :-) I have a dovecot/Horde installation and would like to know : a. How safe will I be backing up dovecot b. What folders/files to backup Let me see now; I am running dovecot v1.2.15 Here's a dump of "dovecot -n" : ---------------------------------------------------------------- [root at mailgate ~]# dovecot -n # 1.2.15:

I'm running into a memory problem when trying to switch some web servers that are running centos4.8/x86_64 to centos5.5/x86_64. The new servers running centos5.5 are using a decent amount more memory than the centos4.8 servers. Here's an example from top: --- centos 5.5 --- $ uname -a Linux ws51 2.6.18-194.17.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Sep 29 12:50:31 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Hello, the network card of my workstation stopped working after I updated the kernel to 2.6.18-194.17.4.el5 . I don't see any specific error messages when booting, and the related interface is shown as up by ifconfig with its (static) IP address properly set. But I cannot reach any other computer or router on the LAN (whereas other boxes work fine). Where the network cable is plugged, an

I have a problem that is driving me crazy. Our nfs server is running Solaris. Most clients mount directories from it with no problems, but not all. All clients that have problems run CentOS (5.4 and 5.5). I've found one or two of each version that fail, but also a couple of each version that work. The mounting is done for user home directories via autofs but that doesn't seem to make any

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0723 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0723.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: thunderbird-1.5.0.12-0.3.el4.centos.i386.rpm src: thunderbird-1.5.0.12-0.3.el4.centos.src.rpm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type:

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0723 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0723.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: thunderbird-1.5.0.12-0.3.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm src: thunderbird-1.5.0.12-0.3.el4.centos.src.rpm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: