similar to: copy values from one dataframes into another

Hi everyone I have some records that include a date attribute for the date and time but i need to separate the data and analyze it separately in GIS by Month and Year, so i need to pull these attributes out and create their own attribute field. So the input: RawData2.. returns ID period_end_date 1 22 9/10/2007 0:00:00 2 44 2/2/2006 0:00:00 and i need to get ID period_end_date

Hello R-experts, I am having difficulties with 3D plotting (i.e. the evolution of various forward curves through time). I have two comma seperated files both ordered by date (in the first column) one containing contracts (meaning forward delivery months from YEAR_ & Letter "F" ... January through letter "Z" ... December) and the other holding the closing price of the

I just found this in my firewall log: May 10 08:58:00 fire2 kernel: Shorewall:rfc1918:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT=eth1 SRC=10.10.10.1 DST=192.168.0.3 LEN=66 TOS=0x00 PREC=0xC0 TTL=254 ID=37790 PROTO=ICMP TYPE=11 CODE=0 [SRC=X.X.X.X DST=65.108.14.222 LEN=38 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=1 ID=62741 PROTO=UDP INCOMPLETE [6 bytes] ] (bracketed source IP removed for anonymity - it is the public IP address of my

Hola. Tengo una duda con esta sintaxis. Tengo una variable con formato Date que por algún motivo (el data.table viene de una consulta con PostgreSQL): datos <- prov[, pprid, pprfecbaja] str(datos) Cuando intento quitar las fechas de bajas inválidas (0001-01-01) y convertirlas a NA, la variable resultante "pierde" su condición de Date. Probé con distintas formas, siempre con el mismo

Hmm, it is not actually at odds with help(c), it is just that the autocoercion works different that it used to, so that as.complex(NA) == as.complex(NA_real) == NA_real_+0i) which now differs from NA_complex although both print as NA. I haven't been quite alert when this change was discussed, but it does look a bit unfortunate that usage patterns like c(NA, 0+1i) does not give complex NA

Is there a method that converts BigDecimal 1520.0 to "one thousand five hundred and twenty"? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to