Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9000 matches similar to: "Centos 4.4 ipvsadm problem"
2010 Apr 27
0
Transparent proxy with LVS
I've managed to configure a LVS Cluster to act as a transparent proxy
squid farm, with a virtual server as load balancer, and three real
servers. Because redirecting packets going to port 80 to port 3128 of
squid in the load balancer doesn't works, the solution has a mix of ip
route and iptables.
Here is the script I wrote to configure transparent proxy.
#!/bin/bash
#Transparent proxy
2006 Feb 12
2
CentOS 4.2 x86_64 - ipvsadm
Hi
Anyone know of there is an rpm available for this? Trying to build a
loadbalancer from the LVS project for a webserver farm and struggling
with ipvsadm
<http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/software/kernel-2.6/ipvsadm-1.24-6.src.rpm>
on 4.2
thanks
2008 Jul 22
0
Oracle apps form server issue with Piranha Load balancer
Hi all,
First of all sorry for writing such a big mail.I am facing problem while
implementing Piranha Load balancer on CENTOS 4 for my two oracle 11i
application server running on linux.
Oracle Real server details
Instance Name - test
url's - 1 . dev.xxx.com:8004
2 . uat.xxx.com:8004
Architecture -
Services installed on dev are
1. Database Server
2.Concurrent Processing
2008 Sep 25
1
Implementing LVS changes made in Piranha GUI
Every time I touch something, pieces fall off! It's a good thing this
stuff isn't in production yet (for me I mean).
So I had an LVS, configured with Piranha, directing http test transactions
across two servers. I used Piranha to add another realserver. It
appeared in the lvs.cf file, but didn't appear in the ipvsadm output. So
I stopped and restarted Pulse. And now *none* of the
2000 Oct 11
0
RE: CBQ and load balancing -> solved
Hi there,
I got the solution for my problem, and thought may at someday somebody
could use it. Julian Anastasov and some people from the LVS mailing list
helped me with it.
---
Subject: Re: LVS and CBQ
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 22:53:01 +0000 (GMT)
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
To: joern maier <joern.maier@informatik.uni-ulm.de>
CC:
2008 Jan 05
2
centos 5.1 fresh install of ipvsadm: service won't start: config missing
Hello all,
I have ipvsadm-1.24 installed, and there's an error when the service starts:
Applying IPVS configuration: /etc/init.d/ipvsadm: line 62:
/etc/sysconfig/ipvsadm: No such file or directory
is the install broken? I did a "yum whatprovides ipvsadm" and it does
say there's a config, but doesn't point to where it is.
any suggestions?
--
---------------
Morpheus:
2005 Apr 07
0
LVS-domain logon -nmbd
Hi all,
I try setup LVS and samba server and i found one problem when I registered computer to domain.
I drawed picture and attach it.
client(195.146.40.2)
|
|
LVS
VIP(195.146.40.1)
DIP(192.168.30.1)
|
|
samba(192.168.30.10)
For clearly understand : I have two networks, external and internal. When
nmbd receive announcment from client send answer to client. Answer packet
contain ipadress of
2011 Sep 22
0
CEBA-2011:0979 CentOS 5 i386 ipvsadm Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0979
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0979.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
71290c9b0f3e950fdf9377c37aeefda3 ipvsadm-1.24-13.el5.i386.rpm
Source:
4c7142a86b63fd934214f3c570ed13d9 ipvsadm-1.24-13.el5.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS
2011 Sep 22
0
CEBA-2011:0979 CentOS 5 x86_64 ipvsadm Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0979
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0979.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
d9a11bd215a3b5e272eef82836ea2c8f ipvsadm-1.24-13.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
4c7142a86b63fd934214f3c570ed13d9 ipvsadm-1.24-13.el5.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
2006 Dec 22
1
IPVS connections not removed
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<font color="#000000">Hi centos users,<br>
<br>
2011 Mar 08
2
keepalived+LVS
hello,
all!
if i want to use lvs function of keepalived , i must install ipvsadm ?
tks!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110308/b8e27203/attachment-0002.html>
2006 Apr 28
2
kernel panic - spin_lock
Guys,
one of our boxes just died with the following error:
kernel panic - not syncing: fs/block_dev.c:396: spin_lock
(fs/block_dev.c:c0361c0) already locked by fs/block_dev.c/287.
The system's an LVS running CentOS 4.3:
centos-release-4-3.2
kernel-2.6.9-34.EL
ipvsadm-1.24-6
heartbeat-1.2.3.cvs.20050927-1.centos4
I note that there's a bug report filed related to CentOS 4.2:
2013 Aug 23
1
Setting Up LVS to Load Balance DNS
Greetings, all:
OS: CentOS 6.4 x86_64
Kernel: 2.6.32-358.14.1
I could use some assistance with setting up pulse to load balance my dns
servers. I've configured tcp and udp port 53 with the piranha gui, set up
arptable rules on the real servers and added the virtual ip to the bond0
interface on the real servers, but I'm still having no luck in getting
things going. A dig against the
2006 Jul 03
1
Problem with CentOS 4.3 on kernel and ipvsadm
I have installed two CentOS 4.3 boxes with LVS (from
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/csgfs/ ) but all boxes died withe this
error frequently:
kernel panic - not syncing: fs/block_dev.c:396: spin_lock
(fs/block_dev.c:c0361c0) already locked by fs/block_dev.c/287.
I have read from this thread http://threebit.net/mail-archive/centos/msg00243.html that this is an unsolved problem.
So i have
2007 Sep 16
0
Port forwarding from dom0 to bridged domU with IPVS
Hi list,
We, an OSS advocacy group, setup a Xen 3.1 machine composed of :
. a 64 bits dom0 running Debian stable amd64
. 2 hvm domUs running OpenBSD amd64
. 2 hvm domUs running NetBSD i386
This machine is to be hosted and reachable from the Internet, but it will
only have one public IP.
Naturally, our first tought was to port-forward using iptables /
netfilter. We didn''t really
2007 Apr 20
0
CentOS 5 and Xen
I'm now running CentOS 5 with about 10 domU's. RH/CentOS did a great
job providing a polished and stable distribution for Xen. Excellent
work!
I would like to now play with using iptables and ipvadm (LVS) in the
domUs. So essentially, what I want to do is to utilize a domU to run
as a NAT/Firewall which directs traffic to another domU running
ipvsadm (LVS). The LVS would then
2008 Jan 03
3
anyone care to point me in the right direction? LVS
i'm trying to setup LVS, and tried both the lvs-dr and the lvs-nat,
but can't get any to work.
I'm hoping people here can answer a few questions that might help and
shed light onto the situation?
#1 with regards to the Real Servers, is there anything that needs to
be configured other that the http service? I ask this, because I
suspect yes, and it has to do with what type of LVS you
2005 Dec 31
2
Missing GPG sigs on Centos 4.2 SRPMS
Howdy folks,
$ cd /opt/mirrors/centos/4.2
$ find -type f | grep "\.rpm" | while read i; do rpm -K "$i"; done | egrep -v ": \(sha1\) dsa sha1 md5 gpg OK\$"
centosplus/SRPMS/reiserfs-utils-3.6.19-2.1.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
extras/SRPMS/drbd-0.7.14-1.centos4.src.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
extras/SRPMS/ipvsadm-1.24-6.src.rpm: (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS:
2007 Jan 15
1
piranha lvsd "cluster" status: how?
Hi,
I've got a couple of machines acting as directors with service=lvs
Is there something similar to 'clustat' for pulse+lvsd?
I need this in order to make our monitorization scripts "cluster-aware",
or else one node will have critical status when there are less nannies
than it expected because the services ran over to the other node.
Thanks in advance,
Rui
--
+ No
2005 Feb 21
1
keepalived on centos 3.4
Is anyone successfully using dag's keepalived-1.1.10-1.1.el3.rf on
centos 3.4?
It's giving me some strange issues (LVS Topology never shows up, even
though I can manually set it w/ ipvsadm)
Attempting to rebuild it has been less than successful, as anyone who
tries will see in their appropriate BUILD/keepalived-1.1.10/config.log
and in the rpmbuild output. It complains about openssl