search for: zilstat

We cannot run the zilstat utility (from http://www.richardelling.com/Home/scripts-and-programs-1/zilstat) on an Solaris 10 u9 / x86 installed according SUNWCreq (which is a core install) while it works fine on a similar config but installed with all packages (SUNWCXall) So we know it works in this environment but it seems...

I have updated zilstat to add observability of the size of the sync write. Details are at: http://www.goldensrule.com/zilstat-intro Enjoy! -- richard

We are looking into the possibility of adding a dedicated ZIL and/or L2ARC devices to our pool. We are looking into getting 4 ? 32GB Intel X25-E SSD drives. Would this be a good solution to slow write speeds? We are currently sharing out different slices of the pool to windows servers using comstar and fibrechannel. We are currently getting around 300MB/sec performance with 70-100% disk busy.

Hi, My customer says: ------------------------------------ Application has NFS directories with millions of files in a directory, and this can''t changed. We are having issues with the EMC appliance and RPC timeouts on the NFS lookup. I am looking doing is moving one of the major NFS exports to as Sun 25k using VCS to cluster a ZFS RAIDZ that is then NFS exported. For performance I

Is there any way to increase the ZFS performance? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

Hi,all I did some test about MySQL''s Insert performance on ZFS, and met a big performance problem,*i''m not sure what''s the point*. Environment 2 Intel X5560 (8 core), 12GB RAM, 7 slc SSD(Intel). A Java client run 8 threads concurrency insert into one Innodb table: *~600 qps when sync_binlog=1 & innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit=1 ~600 qps when sync_binlog=10

apparently if you don''t order a J4200 with drives, you just get filler sleds that won''t accept a hard drive. (had to look at a parts breakdown on sunsolve to figure this out -- the docs should simply make this clear.) it looks like the sled that will accept a drive is part #570-1182. anyone know how i could order 12 of these?

Hi!We''re trying to pinpoint our performance issues and we could use all the help to community can provide. We''re running the latest version of Nexenta on a pretty powerful machine (4x Xeon 7550, 256GB RAM, 12x 100GB Samsung SSDs for the cache, 50GB Samsung SSD for the ZIL, 10GbE on a dedicated switch, 11x pairs of 15K HDDs for the pool). We''re connecting a single Linux

Replacing my current media server with another larger capacity media server. Also switching over to solaris/zfs. Anyhow we have 24 drive capacity. These are for large sequential access (large media files) used by no more than 3 or 5 users at a time. I''m inquiring as to what the best configuration for this is for vdevs. I''m considering the following configurations 4 x x6

...a separate ZFS filesystem likely to improve performance? I''ve heard that this is important, but I''m not clear why this is. Does each filesystem have its own queue in the ARC or ZIL? Here are some statistics taken while the server was busy and access was slow: # /usr/local/sbin/zilstat 5 5 N-Bytes N-Bytes/s N-Max-Rate B-Bytes B-Bytes/s B-Max-Rate ops <=4kB 4-32kB >=32kB 1126664 225332 515872 11485184 2297036 3469312 292 163 51 79 740536 148107 250896 9535488 1907097 4005888 198 106 24 68 758...