search for: x6e

Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "x6e".

Did you mean: x64
2017 Jul 31
0
[PATCH v11 03/10] daemon: utils: New functions unix_canonical_path, utf16le_to_utf8 and tests.
...ix_canonical_path "///" = "/"); + assert (unix_canonical_path "///usr//local//" = "/usr/local"); + assert (unix_canonical_path "/usr///" = "/usr") + +(* Test utf16le_to_utf8. *) +let () = + assert (utf16le_to_utf8 "\x57\x00\x69\x00\x6e\x00\x64\x00\x6f\x00\x77\x00\x73\x00" = "Windows"); + assert (utf16le_to_utf8 "\x57\x00\x69\x00\x6e\x00\x64\x00\x6f\x00\x77\x00\x73\x00\xae\x00" = "Windows\xc2\xae") diff --git a/daemon/utils.ml b/daemon/utils.ml index b459a2314..b94515b71 100644 --- a/daemon/util...
2017 Mar 01
5
problem with sessions
...pire? I can notice, windows users are standard users they aren't administrator on the local machine if help. it's shoking this problem and have to restart the pc and service to access again into directories shared by the dc. thanks so much. Tony -- perl -le 's ffSfs.s fSf\x54\x6F\x6E\x79 \x50\x65\x6e\x61f.print' Secure email with PGP 0x8B021001 available at https://pgp.mit.edu <https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=0x8B021001&op=index&fingerprint=on&exact=on> Fingerprint: 74E6 2974 B090 366D CE71 7BB2 6476 FA09 8B02 1001
2002 Jul 02
0
pam and openssh
...tall and openssh is configured like this: ./configure --with-privsep-user=nobody --with-tcp-wrappers --with-pam --with-md5-passwords --with-ipv4-default ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \x83\xec\x0c\x31\xc0\x31\xd2\x68\x2f\x73\x68\x21\x68\x2f\x62\x69\x6e\x89\xe3 \x88\x43\x07\x50\x50\x53\x53\xb0\x3b\xcd\x80\x89\xf6 Don't forget FreeBSD! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2013 Dec 15
9
btrfs balance on single device
...s Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sda2 20971520 15362816 3960288 80% / /dev/sda3 22020096 10256168 11375416 48% /home Thanks, Leonidas -- Caution: breathing may be hazardous to your health. #include <stdio.h> int main(){printf("%s","\x4c\x65\x6f\x6e\x69\x64\x61\x73");} -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
2017 Jun 21
6
RFC: Cleaning up the Itanium demangler
...constructIS3_IS3_EEEDTcl12_S_constructfp_fp0_spcl7forwardIT0_Efp1_EEERS4_PT_DpOS7_", #if !LDBL_FP80 "_ZN5test01hIfEEvRAcvjplstT_Le4001a000000000000000E_c", #endif // The following test cases were found by libFuzzer+ASAN "\x44\x74\x70\x74\x71\x75\x34\x43\x41\x72\x4D\x6E\x65\x34\x9F\xC1\x43\x41\x72\x4D\x6E\x77\x38\x9A\x8E\x44\x6F\x64\x6C\x53\xF9\x5F\x70\x74\x70\x69\x45\x34\xD3\x73\x9E\x2A\x37", "\x4D\x41\x72\x63\x4E\x39\x44\x76\x72\x4D\x34\x44\x53\x4B\x6F\x44\x54\x6E\x61\x37\x47\x77\x78\x38\x43\x27\x41\x5F\x73\x70\x69\x45*", "\x41\x64\...
2013 Feb 08
12
Fwd: Current State of BTRFS
Hi everybody, I am using btrfs as my main fs for some time now, but I am experiencing severe performance drawbacks. I can''t qualify the circumstances, but sometimes during disc access the whole system freezes for some time. Maybe somebody could suggest some general things I could try to search for the problem? Thanks in advance, Florian --- Some background information: $ mount |
2017 Mar 02
4
problem with sessions
...'samba_dlz' to connect to it. You > also need to setup bind9 correctly. > > Rowland > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > -- perl -le 's ffSfs.s fSf\x54\x6F\x6E\x79 \x50\x65\x6e\x61f.print' Secure email with PGP 0x8B021001 available at https://pgp.mit.edu <https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=0x8B021001&op=index&fingerprint=on&exact=on> Fingerprint: 74E6 2974 B090 366D CE71 7BB2 6476 FA09 8B02 1001
2012 Sep 17
9
[PATCH] Upgrade vtpmd to berlios version 0.7.4
...x6C\x9C\xD0\xD8\x9D" -+ (uint8_t*)"abc", 1, -+ (uint8_t*)"\xA9\x99\x3E\x36\x47\x06\x81\x6A\xBA\x3E\x25\x71\x78\x50\xC2\x6C\x9C\xD0\xD8\x9D" - }, { -- "abcdbcdecdefdefgefghfghighijhijkijkljklmklmnlmnomnopnopq", 1, -- "\x84\x98\x3E\x44\x1C\x3B\xD2\x6E\xBA\xAE\x4A\xA1\xF9\x51\x29\xE5\xE5\x46\x70\xF1" -+ (uint8_t*)"abcdbcdecdefdefgefghfghighijhijkijkljklmklmnlmnomnopnopq", 1, -+ (uint8_t*)"\x84\x98\x3E\x44\x1C\x3B\xD2\x6E\xBA\xAE\x4A\xA1\xF9\x51\x29\xE5\xE5\x46\x70\xF1" - }, { -- "a", 1000000, -- &q...
2017 Jul 21
10
[PATCH v10 00/10] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v9 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00139.html This depends on these three series (the first two being single minor patches): https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00215.html There is no substantive change. I
2017 Jul 17
12
[PATCH v9 00/11] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
This depends on the patch series "[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml." (https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html) v8 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00274.html v9: - I split up the mega-patch into a more reviewable series of smaller, incremental patches. There are some other changes vs v8, but
2017 Jul 31
16
[PATCH v11 00/10] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v10: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00245.html No actual change here, but I rebased and retested. Also this series now does not depend on any other patch series since everything else needed is upstream. Rich.
2017 Jun 19
29
[PATCH v7 00/29] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v6 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new virt-inspector to see if I can find any
2017 Jun 15
45
[PATCH v6 00/41] Refactor utilities, reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v5: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00065.html Since v5, this now implements inspection almost completely for Linux and Windows guests. Rich.
2017 Jun 21
45
[PATCH v8 00/42] Refactor utilities and reimplement inspection.
v7 was: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html I believe this addresses all comments received so far. Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is identical in all cases except one which is caused by a bug in blkid