search for: wwhen

I am finally migrating from Windows to Ubuntu and I am installing a number of Windows electronics and CAD package using Wine 1.0.1-0 on Ubuntu 8.10. Most run with no issues at all and I am very impressed with Wine. However I am now trying to install AADE Filter, a VB6-based filter design application and I get the following message at the end of the installation process:

...n puppet command to apply changes to a puppet client it did not find anything to change just got these three lines "info: Caching catalog for pdlnx-adpt03.kareoprod.ent, info: Applying configuration version ''1362084986'', notice: Finished catalog run in 0.33 seconds". WWhen I put the modules and manifests back in the original place puppet works. Is there anywhere else where I need to change the path to the modules? Changes that I made to puppet.conf file to point to the ne location of the modules and manifest. # The default value is ''$confdir/manif...

...s in tracking down a problem on cygwin that's been bothering me for a while since Win7 and domain. when I do: > mkpasswd -D mkpasswd (434): [31] A device attached to the system is not functioning. A network trace shows that it's trying to get the home dir information from my main user. Wwhen it queries the info Samba returns STATUS UNSUCCESSFUL (indicated in network status of trace). in the log, I see : [2011/06/27 17:41:16.099526, 3] smbd/service.c:845(make_connection_snum) Connect path is '/var/tmp' for service [IPC$] [2011/06/27 17:41:16.099526, 3] smbd/vfs.c:102(vfs_...

..._bug.cgi?id=31868<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.llvm.org__show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D31868&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=kOsLCgQzH7N8ptZ7diJD9g&m=Sv5T08BLc94DspNTrXv67YwHnXVNmVllN9p8B7fZgTs&s=bOw6bI0rowF-LG3wUx222kr4j4lEwZCz1sGk-DR39Ts&e=> Wwhen we see op of phis, we use fake instructions to treat it like we saw ops in the predecessor blocks, and see whether the fake phi we build ends up with real instructions as for the operands. if it does, we insert it. Note this computation is similar to the one SSAPRE does to determine whether anythin...

Hello, In some of our internal benchmarks, I observe that LLVM performs worse than GCC because LLVM fails to perform PRE when GCC can. I hope this problem goes away when NewGVN equipped with PRE, and wonder if anyone has an idea about the status of PRE on top of NewGVN. Thanks! Best, Taewook -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

..._bug.cgi?id=31868<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.llvm.org__show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D31868&d=DwMFaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=kOsLCgQzH7N8ptZ7diJD9g&m=Sv5T08BLc94DspNTrXv67YwHnXVNmVllN9p8B7fZgTs&s=bOw6bI0rowF-LG3wUx222kr4j4lEwZCz1sGk-DR39Ts&e=> Wwhen we see op of phis, we use fake instructions to treat it like we saw ops in the predecessor blocks, and see whether the fake phi we build ends up with real instructions as for the operands. if it does, we insert it. Note this computation is similar to the one SSAPRE does to determine whether anythin...