search for: with_

...sions %patch105 -p1 -b .mkcert-paths %patch106 -p1 -b .quota Since I'm using centos to match RHEL 4 [rpmbuild at test SPECS]$ cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS release 4 (Nahant) I also added to my .rpmmacros for the rpmbuild user I have %bcond_with() %{expand:%%{?_with_%{1}:%%global with_%{1} 1}} %bcond_without() %{expand:%%{!?_without_%{1}:%%global without_%{1} 1}} %with() %{expand:%%{?with_%{1}:1}%%{!?with_%{1}:0}} %without() %{expand:%%{?without_%{1}:0}%%{!?without_%{1}:1}} then rpm -e dovecot su rpmbuild ... rpmbuild -ba postfix.spec rpm -...

It might sound stupid, but I'd like to know if there's any difference. Are those 3 line the same? WITH_KMS=YES WITH_KMS="YES" WITH_KMS=yes Best regards Zoran

hi @ all how can i save my edited text in the database with php? thanks for your support --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send

Hi, Have installed Ubuntu packages for R by adding: deb http:///bin/linux/ubuntu hardy/ to my /etc/apt/sources.list file and using: sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install r-base I understand that to enable shlib I need to download source files to my home directory. When I run apt-get source r-base I get the message: You must put some 'source' URIs in your sources.list Fair enough!

Hi Everyone, This is off-topic, so please feel free to disregard it, but I'm sending it to this list in the hope that it will reach a largish number of users. I am currently looking at updating some of our advocacy material (which advertises exciting new features like SMP support), and before I do I'd like to get a better feel for why the rest of you are using FreeBSD. If you had to

Dear FreeBSD users and system administrators, While the FreeBSD Security Team has traditionally been very good at investigating and responding to security issues in FreeBSD, this only solves half of the security problem: Unless users and administrators of FreeBSD systems apply the security patches provided, the advisories issued accomplish little beyond alerting potential attackers to the

OK, so i''ve played a bit with mocks and mock_models in controller and view tests and i have a question. Is this statement really correct: "We highly recommend that you exploit the mock framework here rather than providing real model objects in order to keep the view specs isolated from changes to your models." (http://rspec.rubyforge.org/documentation/rails/writing/views.html