search for: wifiortraditional

> -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Totaro [mailto:asterisk@totarotechnologies.com] > Here is the DC metro area I drove to work with my laptop > running network > stumber. In the 35 miles it takes to get to the office I stumbled 310 > wireless networks and more than half of those were wide open. > At least in this area, a wifi phone can almost replace a cell. Only

...x the issues. The only complaint I have with it currently is weak encryption. (64 or 128-bit WEP) YMMV. Brian > >Message: 1 >Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:34:45 -0700 >From: Paul Fielding <paul.fielding@shaw.ca> >Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Looking for a wireless phone... > wifiortraditional wireless ? >To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> >Message-ID: <022201c4f996$2c81c810$0400a8c0@MATHILDA> >Content-Type: text/plain; reply-type=original; charset=iso-8859-1; > format=flowed > >You shouldn'...

...Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com <asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Sent: Thu Jan 13 12:34:45 2005 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Looking for a wireless phone... wifiortraditionalwireless ? You shouldn't need any port forwarding. I've found any SIP phones I've worked with have happily moved from site to site behind NATs, etc. So I see no reason to believe that the WiFi phone would be any different - it's just connecting wirelessly instead of with a wir...

In that example you could make outgoing calls only correct? (since incoming likely needs port forwards) I guess the questions becomes "how often are you going to do that to justify the extra $100 or so you going to pay for a wifi sip phone?" Paul Fielding (paul.fielding@shaw.ca) wrote: > > I think some people are missing the point. You can't throw your cordless >