search for: vnew

I want to create a new array which selects values from an original array based on a function of the indices. That is: I want to create a new matrix Vnew[i,j,k]=Vold[i,j,ks] where ks is a function of the index elements i,j,k. I want to do this WITHOUT a loop. Call the function "ksfunction", and the array dimensions nis,njs,nks. I can do this using a loop as follows: # Loop version: Vnew<-array(NA,c(nis,njs,nks) for(i1 in 1:nis)for(j1...

...s_check_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk); + static bool is_valid_srv_id(const guid_t *id) { return !memcmp(&id->b[4], &srv_id_template.b[4], sizeof(guid_t) - 4); @@ -367,6 +369,18 @@ static void hvs_open_connection(struct vmbus_channel *chan) new->sk_state = TCP_SYN_SENT; vnew = vsock_sk(new); + + hvs_addr_init(&vnew->local_addr, if_type); + hvs_remote_addr_init(&vnew->remote_addr, &vnew->local_addr); + + ret = vsock_assign_transport(vnew, vsock_sk(sk)); + /* Transport assigned (looking at remote_addr) must be the + * same where we received the...

...s_check_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk); + static bool is_valid_srv_id(const guid_t *id) { return !memcmp(&id->b[4], &srv_id_template.b[4], sizeof(guid_t) - 4); @@ -366,6 +368,18 @@ static void hvs_open_connection(struct vmbus_channel *chan) new->sk_state = TCP_SYN_SENT; vnew = vsock_sk(new); + + hvs_addr_init(&vnew->local_addr, if_type); + hvs_remote_addr_init(&vnew->remote_addr, &vnew->local_addr); + + ret = vsock_assign_transport(vnew, vsock_sk(sk)); + /* Transport assigned (looking at remote_addr) must be the + * same where we received the...

Most of the patches are reviewed by Dexuan, Stefan, and Jorgen. The following patches need reviews: - [11/15] vsock: add multi-transports support - [12/15] vsock/vmci: register vmci_transport only when VMCI guest/host are active - [15/15] vhost/vsock: refuse CID assigned to the guest->host transport RFC: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1168442/ v1:

Hi all, this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using

Hi all, this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using

This series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use VSOCK with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using VMware

This series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use VSOCK with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using VMware