search for: vm6

...vm-store. With Ubuntu 1204, kernel version is 3.2.40, and ocfs2-tools version is 1.6.4. As the network configure change, there are some issues as the log below. Why is there the information of "Node 255 (he) is the Recovery Master for the dead node 255" in the syslog? Why the host ZHJD-VM6 is blocked until it reboot one day time later, and what is it wait for still? Thanks a lot. Apr 27 17:35:59 ZHJD-VM6 kernel: [ 3734.057330] o2net: Connection to node ZHJD-VM5 (num 5) at 185.200.1.16:7100 has been idle for 30.100 secs, shutting it down. Apr 27 17:35:59 ZHJD-VM6 kernel: [ 3734.057...

...vm-store. With Ubuntu 1204, kernel version is 3.2.40, and ocfs2-tools version is 1.6.4. As the network configure change, there are some issues as the log below. Why is there the information of "Node 255 (he) is the Recovery Master for the dead node 255" in the syslog? Why the host ZHJD-VM6 is blocked until it reboot one day time later, and what is it wait for still? Thanks a lot. Apr 27 17:35:59 ZHJD-VM6 kernel: [ 3734.057330] o2net: Connection to node ZHJD-VM5 (num 5) at 185.200.1.16:7100 has been idle for 30.100 secs, shutting it down. Apr 27 17:35:59 ZHJD-VM6 kernel: [ 3734.057...

...isor. When I use 8 VMs to conduct a test, CPU affinity of the VMs is very strange. Like this: vm_name vcpu_num cpu_affinity Domain-0 8 any VM1 4 1,3,5,7 VM2 4 1,3,5,7 VM3 4 1,3,5,7 VM4 4 1,3,5,7 VM5 4 1,3,5,7 VM6 4 0,2,4,6 VM7 4 0,2,4,6 VM8 4 0,2,4,6 I do not set the CPU affinity in the configuration file, and I cannot find when the hypervisor set the CPU affinity in the source code. In this situation, 4 VCPUs of each VM are binding to 4 PCPUs permanently, an...

Hello, I've been trying to clone one disk image (LVM) to another using virt-resize. Unfortunately I get the following error: # virt-resize /dev/vm/vm6 /dev/vm/vm7 supermin helper [00004ms] finished creating kernel supermin helper [00251ms] finished mke2fs <domain type='kvm'> supermin helper [00252ms] visiting /usr/lib64/guestfs/supermin.d supermin helper [00252ms] visiting /usr/lib64/guestfs/supermin.d/base.img.gz supermin helper [...

...arch_libdir = ''lib'' kernel = "/usr/lib/xen-3.2-1/boot/hvmloader" device_model = ''/usr/lib/xen-3.2-1/bin/qemu-dm'' builder = ''hvm'' name = "deb50" memory = 256 disk = [ ''phy:/dev/vol_xen/vm6-swap,sda1,w'', ''phy:/dev/vol_xen/vm6-disk,sda2,w'', ''file:/share/data1/iso/debian_i386_5.0.iso,sdc:cdrom,r'', ] boot = ''d'' vif = [ ''type=ioemu'' ] on_poweroff = ''de...

...the ip address and mac address while the bridge gets them. Why does it need to be that way. Why cant bridge act as a dummy interface and eth0 remains unchanged. 2.   Is it possible to allow 2 vms (vm1, vm2) to use the bridge, 2 other vms (vm3 and vm4) to use NAT topology and other 2 vms (vm5 and vm6) to use Routed topology over the same physical network interface ?    i.e can I configure physical interface to    a. connect to the bridge    b. Act as a NAT router    c. Normal router    all together ?   What kind of setup needs to be done on dom0 and can I select the vif script via script=&...

Hello, There is a xen setup in which "brctl show" gives the following output. bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces eth1 8000.003048c9d4df no peth1 vif1.0 vif2.0

...nection to one leased line that is used for incoming/outgoing mail and incoming webmail accesses: VM1=webrelay, directly connected to WEB VM2=backup link to web VM3=mailrelay, directly connected to WEB VM4=internal firewall, directly connected to LAN VM5 is for connection to the first ADSL line VM6 is for connection to the second ADSL line VM7 is directly connected to WEB, for SSH/VPN from outside VM8 is directly connected to WEB, for external DNS VM9 is directly connected to WEB, for external home page ------------------------------------------- The hostess machine is just installed with S...

...(_;y4^0lUZ25W zgN=<1dc6*vPC=gM^z(!yNnSv5UIDve?Fn&*kM!~_(R;r5<u9?fcfj7kF(%Puc}~CA zW6<r8=Q*8D2cgwEb4AH0vX>Z?Gx(-KV-Sg4(>;_@=u)GlqAW`mvpL>-@?Mv^tZ*)} z?40!^Nye>PxA^Gq{VqTK(?890I*r-!smwCQY|Zh}3CraYB~o0l%;yyj6PH_Eg>AQ( ztH!l5FAlU}V`Gcqa5K^#1I(I+<+5TiFPTgi9M4Lo(=p at mn8kd`Vm6|zri{uthbIe+ zZ_v`BLRe2<lolvyBITsLCTUTS7hSsDA>AUS+aE9-4%zHQ&<BG7MUgQW^byVxf^XL* zz6(n{JU+sE%YzSJ!Zp4v8)DkNsM^w at s&ELbtywG<Os7*O(>crK5 at +v_u2$ed%nX%^ zF~t~zGMaL+q+XUl6yICD*LzD|6ny>bUuU^olBOw5)7;HFX+P7X6&mafx at 1|w-rhdl z&9f+N at F9vhI2+k}K6tE9Sf^N4mc~o0w^U7o3j*&...

I'm recording TCP network throughput performance between Dom0 IP stack and all my guest domains (currently 6 running simultaneously). All guests are running simultaneously, but I only ever transmit between Dom0 and one of the DomUs while the other five are idle. When running a netperf TCP_STREAM test (netperf on Dom0, netserver on DomU) I record the following performance numbers, CPU % as