search for: vbd_oo

...----- xentop - 01:44:00 Xen 3.4.3-rc4-pre 1 domains: 1 running, 0 blocked, 0 paused, 0 crashed, 0 dying, 0 shutdown Mem: 4160828k total, 4022996k used, 137832k free CPUs: 4 @ 2308MHz NAME STATE CPU(sec) CPU(%) MEM(k) MEM(%) MAXMEM(k) MAXMEM(%) VCPUS NETS NETTX(k) NETRX(k) VBDS VBD_OO VBD_RD VBD_WR SSID Domain-0 -----r 109 2.2 3965032 95.3 no limit n/a 4 ---------- xm mem-set Domain-0 512 xentop showed ~1G memory (26% memory), then right after this i tried xm mem-set Domain-0 192 ... box died with caps and scroll lock flashing. I had dom0_m...

Hi all, On xen platform, the output of xentop tool is like this: NAME STATE CPU(sec) CPU(%) MEM(k) MEM(%) MAXMEM(k) MAXMEM(%) VCPUS NETS NETTX(k) NETRX(k)VBDS VBD_OO VBD_RD VBD_WR VBD_RSECT VBD_WSECT SSID Domain-0 -----r 96025 0.0 3902464 23.3 no limit n/a 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 slave3 --b--- 85503 0.0 4194304 25.1 4194304 25.1 2 1 30621...

Hi all, Now I use xentop to get disk statistical information. NAME STATE CPU(sec) CPU(%) MEM(k) MEM(%) MAXMEM(k) MAXMEM(%) VCPUS NETS NETTX(k) NETRX(k) VBDS VBD_OO VBD_RD VBD_WR VBD_RSECT VBD_WSECT SSID Domain-0 -----r 96233 0.7 3902464 23.3 no limit n/a 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 slave3 --b--- 85587 0.0 4194304 25.1 4194304 25.1 2 1 30622...

...l as Dom0''s high load during netperf running. It means DomU accturally received the packats from Host1''s Dom0. TTVM''s NETRX changed this way : 9699596->9709952->9845192 NAME STATE CPU(sec) CPU(%) MEM(k) MEM(%) MAXMEM(k) MAXMEM(%) VCPUS NETS NETTX(k) NETRX(k) VBDS VBD_OO VBD_RD VBD_WR SSID Domain-0 -----r 2145 0.7 523008 6.2 no limit n/a 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TTVM --b--- 189 0.1 260864 3.1 262144 3.1 1 1 21583488 9699596 1 0 2270 1325 0 NAME STATE CPU(sec) CPU(%) MEM(k) MEM(%) MAXMEM(k) MAXMEM(%) VCPUS NETS NETTX(k) NETRX(k) VBDS VBD_OO VBD_RD VBD_WR SSID Domain-0 ----...

...what i have xentop - 11:46:22 Xen 3.4.2 2 domains: 1 running, 1 blocked, 0 paused, 0 crashed, 0 dying, 0 shutdown Mem: 4184164k total, 706684k used, 3477480k free CPUs: 16 @ 2394MHz NAME STATE CPU(sec) CPU(%) MEM(k) MEM(%) MAXMEM(k) MAXMEM(%) VCPUS NETS NETTX(k) NETRX(k) VBDS VBD_OO VBD_RD VBD_WR SSID Domain-0 -----r 46 0.9 316416 7.6 316416 7.6 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PVG1 --b--- 0 0.0 262060 6.3 263168 6.3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 How c...

...he guest. xentop - 14:36:29 Xen 3.2-1 10 domains: 1 running, 9 blocked, 0 paused, 0 crashed, 0 dying, 0 shutdown Mem: 4192752k total, 2654960k used, 1537792k free CPUs: 4 @ 3000MHz NAME STATE CPU(sec) CPU(%) MEM(k) MEM(%) MAXMEM(k) MAXMEM(%) VCPUS NETS NETTX(k) NETRX(k) VBDS VBD_OO VBD_RD VBD_WR SSID windowsxpsp3 --b--- 329 *70.1* 270204 6.4 278528 6.6 1 1 5 377 1 0 4206 1329 2149627072 Domain-0 -----r 46489 1.1 427416 10.2 no limit n/a 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 2...

...entop - 10:11:06 Xen 3.1.2-194.11.4.el5 39 domains: 1 running, 38 blocked, 0 paused, 0 crashed, 0 dying, 0 shutdown Mem: 25165116k total, 25150528k used, 14588k free CPUs: 8 @ 1995MHz NAME STATE CPU(sec) CPU(%) MEM(k) MEM(%) MAXMEM(k) MAXMEM(%) VCPUS NETS NETTX(k) NETRX(k) VBDS VBD_OO VBD_RD VBD_WR SSID Domain-0 -----r 1583 17.1 3220540 12.8 no limit n/a 8 32 1932 32747 0 0 0 0 0 _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

I''ve run into a problem gathering usage for my xen virtual systems. With my old model I used to gather all network usage via my cisco devices using the the counters for each port. Each system had it''s own port on the switch, and I tracked network usage accordingly. Now that I''m using xen for virtual systems, and multiple vm''s share the same switch port,

I am creating some custom nagios plugins and I am scraping data from xen using the nagios command: /usr/sbin/xentop -b -i 2 -d1 I am trying to get the network tx / rx data, however I think I am missing something here. NETTX(k) NETRX(k) So total network bandwidth is 1048576 k if the above header from xentop is true. So I am wondering why the output for each vm exceeds the theoretical max, Is

...n 4.0.1 8 domains: 1 running, 7 blocked, 0 paused, 0 crashed, 0 dying, 0 shutdown Mem: 6159740k total, 6152940k used, 6800k free    CPUs: 2 @ 3027MHz       NAME  STATE   CPU(sec) CPU(%)     MEM(k) MEM(%)  MAXMEM(k) MAXMEM(%) VCPUS NETS NETTX(k) NETRX(k) VBDS   VBD_OO   VBD_RD   VBD_WR  VBD_RSECT  VBD_WSECT SSID   BuildEnv --b---        296    2.1    1052640   17.1    1052672      17.1     2    1        0        0    1        0        0        0          0          0    0 Net0 RX:        0bytes        0pkts        0err        0dro...

...xentop - 14:07:05 Xen 3.1.0-53.1.21.el5 4 domains: 1 running, 3 blocked, 0 paused, 0 crashed, 0 dying, 0 shutdown Mem: 8387960k total, 4979120k used, 3408840k free CPUs: 4 @ 2133MHz NAME STATE CPU(sec) CPU(%) MEM(k) MEM(%) MAXMEM(k) MAXMEM(%) VCPUS NETS NETTX(k) NETRX(k) VBDS VBD_OO VBD_RD VBD_WR SSID cPanel001 --b--- 7673 0.6 1048444 12.5 1048576 12.5 2 1 30798 700440 1 0 196241 935986 0 cPanel002 --b--- 221 0.1 1048420 12.5 1048576 12.5 2 1 67 2408 1 0 20380 237...

...set up a Xen testbed on a computer.(Dom0 use debian lenny) I would like to know the possible ways to monitor the network traffic of DomU''s from Dom0. # command ''xentop'' display NAME STATE CPU(sec) CPU(%) MEM(k) MEM(%) MAXMEM(k) MAXMEM(%) VCPUS NETS NETTX(k) NETRX(k) VBDS VBD_OO VBD_RD VBD_WR SSID debianlenny --b--- 14 0.0 270204 25.8 278528 26.6 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 32 debiansqueeze --b--- 10 0.0 270204 25.8 278528 26.6 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 32 Domain-0 -----r 44 0.5 473088 45.2 no limit n/a 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 the NETTX(k) / NETRX(k) values is not changing.. # Dom0 use (network-sc...

...ample, xentop - 11:46:40 Xen 3.0-unstable 3 domains: 1 running, 2 blocked, 0 paused, 0 crashed, 0 dying, 0 shutdown Mem: 1023220k total, 1022428k used, 792k free CPUs: 2 @ 2658MHz NAME STATE CPU(sec) CPU(%) MEM(k) MEM(%) MAXMEM(k) MAXMEM(%) VCPUS NETS NETTX(k) NETRX(k) VBDS VBD_OO VBD_RD VBD_WR SSID Domain-0 -----r 725 3.4 729088 71.3 no limit n/a 2 4 21 22 0 0 0 0 0 FC6PVM --b--- 62 0.1 131072 12.8 131072 12.8 2 1 10 16 1 0 20537 96...

...y does this happen? Xentop detail data: 2 domains: 2 running, 0 blocked, 0 paused, 0 crashed, 0 dying, 0 shutdown Mem: 25099756k total, 20868028k used, 4231728k free CPUs: 16 @ 2400MHz NAME STATE CPU(sec) CPU(%) MEM(k) MEM(%) MAXMEM(k) MAXMEM(%) VCPUS NETS NETTX(k) NETRX(k) VBDS VBD_OO VBD_RD VBD_WR SSID Domain-0 -----r 822 38.9 16314368 65.0 no limit n/a 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 vm03 -----r 77 13.6 4193024 16.7 4194304 16.7 4 1 12177577 73198 1 0 68043 37282 0 Top...

...xentop - 12:02:36 Xen 3.1.2-92.1.6.el5 2 domains: 2 running, 0 blocked, 0 paused, 0 crashed, 0 dying, 0 shutdown Mem: 16775712k total, 11629904k used, 5145808k free CPUs: 8 @ 2194MHz NAME STATE CPU(sec) CPU(%) MEM(k) MEM(%) MAXMEM(k) MAXMEM(%) VCPUS NETS NETTX(k) NETRX(k) VBDS VBD_OO VBD_RD VBD_WR SSID Domain-0 -----r 50891 1.5 901352 5.4 no limit n/a 8 4 17720114 18765713 0 0 0 0 0 monolith -----r 965342 599.2 10486632 62.5 10486784 62.5 6 2 332672635 30178285 2 0 15805538 60805435 0 I'...

Hi, when installing windows server 2008 Std hvm I get always a blue screen telling me: ''a clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within the allocated time interval'' I googled around and found, that this occured with vista as well: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-changelog/2007-01/msg00170.html Config is: + virt-install --name=win2008ss

Hi I''ve been running xen with linux guests for a while now and thought I''d try windows as I have a new server. All seemed to go fine except performance is *horrible* - I''m currently installing Win2003 SP2 and it''s been running over 12 hours (thank god for vnc) - each individual file is taking between 3 and 4 seconds each. Server is an intel E6600 with

Hi Everyone, I am trying my hands on xen under Solaris SXCE build 113. The machine has the following configuration: 2 Quad Core Xeon CPUs 16 GB RAM Solaris SXCE b113 4 disks - 2 mirrors x 2 stripes under ZFS The problem is that xen HVM is very slow. I am using the following command to create an Ubuntu 9.0.4 test vm. virt-install -n test1 -r 2048 --vcpus=2 -f /vdatapool/data/test1.img -s 50

Hello, i''ve a xen-4.0.0-rc1 with 2.6.31.6 pv_ops. Dom0 seams to work fine. But i can only boot "old" domU kernel. A pv_ops Kernel hangs after initrd. Regards, Stefan Kuhne _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hello, i''ve a xen-4.0.0-rc1 with 2.6.31.6 pv_ops. Dom0 seams to work fine. But i can only boot "old" domU kernel. A pv_ops Kernel hangs after initrd. Regards, Stefan Kuhne _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel