Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "user_sourc".
Did you mean:
user_source
2016 Sep 14
2
How to obtain a "non-stripped" executable for producing a usable core-dump
...0}, __u6_addr32 = {0, 0, 0, 0}}}, ip4 =
{s_addr = 0}}},
local_port = 65320, remote_port = 59489, userdb_fields = 0x0,
flags_override_add = MAIL_STORAGE_SERVICE_FLAG_DISALLOW_ROOT,
flags_override_remove = (unknown: 0), no_userdb_lookup = 0}
storage = 0x1
user_source = 0x56242ac6d3af ""
destaddr_source = 0x56242ac6d3af ""
process_euid = 5000
stderr_rejection = false
ret = <optimized out>
c = <optimized out>
error = MAIL_ERROR_NONE
Thanks in advance for any additional insight that...
2012 Apr 26
2
LDA crashes on delivery (using sieve)
...lt;repeats 15 times>, __u6_addr16 = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0}, __u6_addr32 = {0, 0, 0, 0}}}, ip4 = {s_addr = 0}}}, local_port =
0, remote_port = 0, userdb_fields = 0x0, flags_override_add = 0,
flags_override_remove = 0,
no_userdb_lookup = 0}
storage = (struct mail_storage *) 0x0
user_source = (const __unknown__ *) 0x4034c0 ""
destaddr_source = (const __unknown__ *) 0x403576 "-a parameter"
process_euid = 0
stderr_rejection = false
ret = 1
c = -1
error = MAIL_ERROR_NONE
Cheers,
Olivier
2015 Jan 03
0
dovecot-lda segfaults with replication
...t;, __u6_addr16 = {0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0,
0}, __u6_addr32 = {0, 0, 0, 0}}}, ip4 = {s_addr = 0}}},
local_port = 0,
remote_port = 0, userdb_fields = 0x0, flags_override_add = 0,
flags_override_remove = 0, no_userdb_lookup = 0}
storage = (struct mail_storage *) 0x0
user_source = 0x404090 ""
destaddr_source = 0x403d73 "-a parameter"
process_euid = 0
stderr_rejection = false
ret = 1
c = -1
error = MAIL_ERROR_NONE
# 2.2.15: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# Pigeonhole version 0.4.6 (3e924b1b6c5...
2016 Sep 14
2
How to obtain a "non-stripped" executable for producing a usable core-dump
Hello,
I'm attempting to capture a core-dump file, and gdb reports
warning: core file may not match specified executable file.
And only after installing "dovecot-dbg" on my system (Ubuntu 16.04 LTS)
does gdb report further
warning: the debug information found in "/lib64/ld-2.23.so" does not
match "/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2" (CRC mismatch).
It took some
2019 Oct 07
3
Sieve redirect is broken in 2.3.7.2 - signal 11
...s6_addr32 = {0, 0, 0, 0}}}, ip4 = {s_addr =
0}}}, local_port = 0,
????????? remote_port = 0, userdb_fields = 0x0, flags_override_add =
(unknown: 0), flags_override_remove = (unknown: 0), no_userdb_lookup =
false, debug = false,
????????? conn_secured = false, conn_ssl_secured = false}
??????? user_source = <optimized out>
??????? rcpt_to_source = <optimized out>
??????? process_euid = <optimized out>
??????? stderr_rejection = false
??????? ret = <optimized out>
??????? c = <optimized out>
On 2019. 10. 06. 23:28, Stephan Bosch via dovecot wrote:
>
>
> O...
2010 Oct 10
3
Segfault in dovecot-lda 2.0.5
...= 0x0, inbox =
false, hidden = false,
list = 0x0, subscriptions = false, user_set = 0x0}
storage = <value optimized out>
box = 0x85801c0
raw_box = <value optimized out>
input = 0x0
t = 0x8584d90
headers_ctx = 0x0
user_source = 0x804ab2c ""
sets = <value optimized out>
process_euid = <value optimized out>
stderr_rejection = false
mtime = -1
ret = <value optimized out>
c = <value optimized out>
error = <value optimized ou...
2019 Oct 07
1
Sieve redirect is broken in 2.3.7.2 - signal 11
...= 0}}}, local_port = 0,
>> ????????? remote_port = 0, userdb_fields = 0x0, flags_override_add =
>> (unknown: 0), flags_override_remove = (unknown: 0), no_userdb_lookup
>> = false, debug = false,
>> ????????? conn_secured = false, conn_ssl_secured = false}
>> ??????? user_source = <optimized out>
>> ??????? rcpt_to_source = <optimized out>
>> ??????? process_euid = <optimized out>
>> ??????? stderr_rejection = false
>> ??????? ret = <optimized out>
>> ??????? c = <optimized out>
>>
>> On 2019. 10. 06....
2019 Oct 07
0
Sieve redirect is broken in 2.3.7.2 - signal 11
...ip4 = {s_addr
> = 0}}}, local_port = 0,
> ????????? remote_port = 0, userdb_fields = 0x0, flags_override_add =
> (unknown: 0), flags_override_remove = (unknown: 0), no_userdb_lookup =
> false, debug = false,
> ????????? conn_secured = false, conn_ssl_secured = false}
> ??????? user_source = <optimized out>
> ??????? rcpt_to_source = <optimized out>
> ??????? process_euid = <optimized out>
> ??????? stderr_rejection = false
> ??????? ret = <optimized out>
> ??????? c = <optimized out>
>
> On 2019. 10. 06. 23:28, Stephan Bosch via do...
2012 Dec 13
5
dovecot-lda (2.1.12) segfaults
We uograded our dovecot from version 2.1.10 -> 2.10.12, but within
the first hour of use, dovecot-lda would segfault during delivery.
This left a lock file lying around causing the user's mail readers to
hang; much hilarity ensues. All further deliveries to the same user
will result in a crash.
The only thing that fixes this condition is to blow away the user's
INBOX cache index.
2019 Oct 06
2
Sieve redirect is broken in 2.3.7.2 - signal 11
I think alpine does not have that
https://pkgs.alpinelinux.org/packages?name=dovecot*&branch=v3.8&repo=main&arch=x86_64
https://git.alpinelinux.org/aports/tree/main/dovecot/APKBUILD?h=3.8-stable
What else would help? strace?
On 2019. 10. 06. 23:05, Stephan Bosch via dovecot wrote:
>
>
> On 06/10/2019 23:03, Demonhost wrote:
>> Hi Stephan,
>>
>> I managed