search for: urate

...1] I SEND:SETUP oad:16 dad:10030224326465 P[ 1] --> mode:TE cause:16 ocause:16 rad: P[ 1] --> facility:FAC_NONE out_facility:FAC_NONE P[ 1] --> info_dad: onumplan:0 dnumplan:0 rnumplan:0 P[ 1] --> screen:0 --> pres:0 P[ 1] --> channel:0 caps:Speech pi:0 keypad: P[ 1] --> urate:0 rate:16 mode:0 user1:0 P[ 1] --> pid:0 addr:50010101 l3id:30074 P[ 1] --> b_stid:0 layer_id:50010180 P[ 1] --> new_l3id 30075 P[ 1] --> * SEND: State Dialing pid:276 -- Called 1/10030224326465/n P[ 1] set_channel: bc->channel:1 channel:1 P[ 1] --> TRANSPARENT Mode (no DS...

...x0) --> SCREEN: Unscreened (0x0) --> * adding2newbc ext 118913 --> * adding2newbc callerid 717201234 I SEND:SETUP oad:717201234 dad:118913 port:2 --> mode:TE cause:16 ocause:16 rad: --> info_dad: onumplan:0 dnumplan:0 rnumplan:0 --> channel:0 caps:Speech pi:0 keypad: --> urate:0 rate:0 mode:0 user1:0 --> pid:0 addr:51400102 l3id:11000c --> new_l3id 11000e --> * SEND: State Dialing pid:43 I IND :SETUP_ACKNOWLEDGE oad:717201234 dad:118913 port:2 --> mode:TE cause:16 ocause:16 rad: --> info_dad: onumplan:0 dnumplan:0 rnumplan:0 --> channel:1 caps:Spee...

...ad:4656708 dad:465670127 P[ 5] --> mode:TE cause:16 ocause:16 rad: cad: P[ 5] --> facility:FAC_NONE out_facility:FAC_NONE P[ 5] --> info_dad: onumplan:2 dnumplan:2 rnumplan: cpnnumplan:0 P[ 5] --> screen:0 --> pres:0 P[ 5] --> channel:1 caps:Speech pi:0 keypad: P[ 5] --> urate:0 rate:16 mode:0 user1:0 P[ 5] --> pid:0 addr:0 l3id:a0001 P[ 5] --> b_stid:0 layer_id:0 P[ 5] --> bc:821d7ac h:0 sh:0 P[ 5] --> bc_state:BCHAN_CLEANED P[ 5] --> Bearer: Speech P[ 5] --> Codec: Alaw P[ 0] --> * NEW CHANNEL dad:465670127 oad:4656708 P[ 5] --> CTON: Un...

...found in the code below) My problem is the following: when I try to maximize the log-likelihood function using "optim" with method "BFGS", I get the following error message (about the second integral): > out <- optim(alpha.start, LLK, gr=NULL, method="BFGS", y=urate$y) Error in integrate(f3, lower = -Inf, upper = upr2) : the integral is probably divergent Since I know that all the three integrals are convergent, I do not understand why I am getting this error message. My first question: can someone explain what mistake I am making? What is even more...

...ypad: sending_complete:1 Wed Nov 5 21:04:15 2008: P[ 2] --> screen:0 --> pres:0 Wed Nov 5 21:04:15 2008: P[ 2] --> addr:0 l3id:4004e b_stid:0 layer_id:50010280 Wed Nov 5 21:04:15 2008: P[ 2] --> facility:Fac_None out_facility:Fac_None Wed Nov 5 21:04:15 2008: P[ 2] --> urate:0 rate:16 mode:0 user1:0 Wed Nov 5 21:04:15 2008: P[ 2] --> bc:4352e1c h:0 sh:0 Wed Nov 5 21:04:15 2008: P[ 2] --> bc_state:BCHAN_CLEANED Wed Nov 5 21:04:15 2008: P[ 0] get_index: event not found! Wed Nov 5 21:04:15 2008: P[ 2] Chan not existing at the moment bc->l3id:4004e bc:0...

I am trying to use misdn insted of zaphfc to drive two billion isdn cards zaphfc is ok, but the problem with cdr and the fact tha you always have to wait the bristuffed version of asterisk took me to try another way. so I downloaded the misdn installation script from beronet for the last version ( I am using asterisk stable 1.2, so now is 1.2.5) wget

This patch allows DSA identities to be specified on the command line. Previously, only RSA identities were allowed. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ diff -U2 openssh-2.2.0p1/ssh.0 openssh-2.2.0p1.nigelw/ssh.0 --- openssh-2.2.0p1/ssh.0 Sat Sep 2 10:08:46 2000 +++ openssh-2.2.0p1.nigelw/ssh.0 Thu Dec 21 10:53:07 2000 @@ -224,5 +224,5 @@ -g Allows

...an:0 cpnnumplan:0 -->> P[ 1] --> caps:Speech pi:0 keypad: sending_complete:0 -->> P[ 1] --> screen:0 --> pres:0 -->> P[ 1] --> addr:0 l3id:95bfc b_stid:0 layer_id:50010180 -->> P[ 1] --> facility:FAC_NONE out_facility:FAC_NONE -->> P[ 1] --> urate:0 rate:16 mode:0 user1:0 -->> P[ 1] --> bc:8212590 h:0 sh:0 -->> P[ 1] find_free_chan: req_chan:0 -->> P[ 1] --> found chan: 1 -->> P[ 1] set_chan_in_stack: 1 -->> P[ 1] --> found channel: 1 -->> P[ 1] --> new_l3id 95bfd -->> P[ 1] -...

...ells me there is no method available for plm objects, while waldtest tells me my models are not nested. I think they are instead. The difference between the two models is that in the second I let the regression coefficients of a given variable variate according to a factor. MODEL 1 depFE.plm = plm(urate ~ l1_urate + month, model = "within", data = unempl_data1, effect = "individual") MODEL 2 depLDFE.plm = plm(urate ~ factor(ID):l1_urate + month, model = "within", data = unempl_data1, effect = "individual") anova > anova(depFE.plm, depLDFE.plm) Errore in...

...NE oad:206361 dad:520101 P[ 1] --> mode:TE cause:16 ocause:16 rad: cad: P[ 1] --> facility:FAC_NONE out_facility:FAC_NONE P[ 1] --> info_dad: onumplan:0 dnumplan:0 rnumplan:0 cpnnumplan:0 P[ 1] --> screen:0 --> pres:0 P[ 1] --> channel:1 caps:Speech pi:2 keypad: P[ 1] --> urate:0 rate:16 mode:0 user1:0 P[ 1] --> pid:1 addr:50010102 l3id:30001 P[ 1] --> b_stid:10010100 layer_id:50010180 P[ 1] --> bc_state:BCHAN_ACTIVATED P[ 1] --> DTMF:* What's this all about? Is there anything I can do about it?

...t; -->> P[ 1] --> screen:0 --> pres:0 -->> > -->> P[ 1] --> addr:0 l3id:95bfc b_stid:0 -->> > layer_id:50010180 -->> > -->> P[ 1] --> facility:FAC_NONE -->> > out_facility:FAC_NONE -->> > -->> P[ 1] --> urate:0 rate:16 mode:0 user1:0 -->> > -->> P[ 1] --> bc:8212590 h:0 sh:0 -->> > -->> P[ 1] find_free_chan: req_chan:0 -->> > -->> P[ 1] --> found chan: 1 -->> > -->> P[ 1] set_chan_in_stack: 1 -->> > -->> P[ 1]...

Hi, Just a question. I have a samba PDC with LDAP backend. I want squid / dansguardian use the user auth from samba NTLM bases. i need user and group filtering and i want it transparent. 2 steps, auth, first the NTLM auth on port 80 to be transparent. second, the dansgadian filter filtering groups. this looks bit like it, but this authenicates against ADS.

...d: cad: P[ 1] --> info_dad: onumplan:0 dnumplan:0 rnumplan:0 cpnnumplan:0 P[ 1] --> caps:Speech pi:0 keypad: sending_complete:0 P[ 1] --> screen:0 --> pres:0 P[ 1] --> addr:0 l3id:95bfc b_stid:0 layer_id:50010180 P[ 1] --> facility:FAC_NONE out_facility:FAC_NONE P[ 1] --> urate:0 rate:16 mode:0 user1:0 P[ 1] --> bc:8212590 h:0 sh:0 P[ 1] find_free_chan: req_chan:0 P[ 1] --> found chan: 1 P[ 1] set_chan_in_stack: 1 P[ 1] --> found channel: 1 P[ 1] --> new_l3id 95bfd P[ 1] --> * SEND: State Dialing pid:2626 -- Called g:ISDN_GROUP/6666666666 P[ 1] Sen...

> > I boot my system with the attached extlinux.conf, which has some > entries to boot old kernels. When i'm booting the old versions i'd > like to have a reminder message recalling me that the most recent > kernel is not being used, so that i don't forget to switch back to it, > for example after many days of uptime. > > Now, is it normal that _every_ SAY

Bugs item #13560, was opened at 2007-08-31 15:07 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=411&aid=13560&group_id=85 Category: win32-service Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Nobody (None) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: Service dependencies has wierd string. Initial Comment: Hello, My name is Jong Lee from

-------------------------------------------------- Eltemette az elef?nt-trutyi Paderborn, N?metorsz?g Friedrich Riesfeldt ?llatkerti gondoz? sz?kreked?ses elef?ntj?nak beadott 22 adag ?llati hashajt?t ?s megetette egy v?ka szederrel, f?g?vel ?s szilv?val. A bedugult vastagb?r? v?g?l els?lt - ?s megfojtotta a gondoz?t 200 font trutyival. A vizsg?lat szerint a 46 ?ves Friedrich megpr?b?lt a beteg

raf wrote: > Warlich, Christof wrote: > > ... > > I want to be able to ssh to all internal hosts that live in the internal.sub.domain.net, > > i.e. that are only accessible through the internal.sub.domain.net jumphost without > > having to list each of these hosts somewhere, as they may frequently be added or > > removed from the internal domain and without being

Hi, I have a small issue with the SAY command and i hope you can clarify it out for me. I boot my system with the attached extlinux.conf, which has some entries to boot old kernels. When i'm booting the old versions i'd like to have a reminder message recalling me that the most recent kernel is not being used, so that i don't forget to switch back to it, for example after many days of

If you don't use 'CERTVERIFY 1', then this will at least make sure that nobody can sniff your sessions without a large effort (...) > So, do I misunderstand CERTVERIFY directive ? Or is there a bug ? >> Can you reproduce such behaviour ? >> > > I'm not sure what is going on. Can you try running 'upsmon' with debugging > enabled? The following are

...--> info_dad: onumplan:2 dnumplan:0 rnumplan: cpnnumplan:0 P[ 1] --> caps:Speech pi:0 keypad: sending_complete:1 P[ 1] --> screen:0 --> pres:0 P[ 1] --> addr:50010102 l3id:2000b b_stid:10010100 layer_id:50010180 P[ 1] --> facility:Fac_None out_facility:Fac_None P[ 1] --> urate:0 rate:16 mode:0 user1:0 P[ 1] --> bc:81aecfc h:0 sh:0 P[ 1] --> bc_state:BCHAN_ACTIVATED P[ 1] --> DTMF:7 P[ 1] Sending :160 bytes 2 MISDN P[ 0] misdn_jb_fill: written:160 | Buffer status:288 p:861fee0 P[ 1] * IND : Indication [20] from s P[ 1] --> * Unknown Indication:20 pid:64 P[...