search for: undiagnosed

...re-installed the server with >> CentOS 7. Now, when I am trying to run 'fdisk -l' command, it is returning >> a broken output. >> >> It throws this error- "fdisk: cannot open /dev/sdc: Input/output error". >> > > > > So, your server had an undiagnosed problem, and now it reports read errors > on /dev/sdc? Do you think those two things might be related? > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >

Hi, There was some problem with our system so I re-installed the server with CentOS 7. Now, when I am trying to run 'fdisk -l' command, it is returning a broken output. It throws this error- "fdisk: cannot open /dev/sdc: Input/output error". There are valid /dev/sdd and /dev/sde devices which are mounted and they are accessible but, somehow /dev/sdc is having a problem and

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99900 --- Comment #22 from Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- "Random anything" is a wholly undiagnosable issue. 4.12.11 resolved a regression in 4.12 which caused EDID to not be read properly over DP. There have been many reports of this causing a variety of issues. Sounds like your issue is wholly unrelated to the original

...ere was some problem with our system so I re-installed the server with > CentOS 7. Now, when I am trying to run 'fdisk -l' command, it is returning > a broken output. > > It throws this error- "fdisk: cannot open /dev/sdc: Input/output error". So, your server had an undiagnosed problem, and now it reports read errors on /dev/sdc? Do you think those two things might be related?

...7. Now, when I am trying to run 'fdisk -l' command, it is >>> returning >>> a broken output. >>> >>> It throws this error- "fdisk: cannot open /dev/sdc: Input/output error". >>> >> >> >> >> So, your server had an undiagnosed problem, and now it reports read >> errors on /dev/sdc? Do you think those two things might be related? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS at centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cen...

I tried SIS a couple years ago - I was very excited with the resulting decrease in storage requirements but the undiagnosed intermittent issues became too significant to ignore so I switched away.? Recently I was thinking about it again. The primary issue with SIS seemed to be links would be deleted even though the source attachment files and related mails still existed.? It was possible to either manually re-build...

...#39;t diagnose the error unless the user is wiling to endure false positives by opting into the more verbose mode Paul suggested. > > Approach B (from that some comment): FileCheck ignores the directive. That just makes things worse because the above otherwise well formed directive is then an undiagnosed malformed directive (unless the user opts into a more verbose mode). > > Approach C (new proposal): FileCheck reports the directive as an error (in any mode). The more verbose mode is still needed to catch the case that the : is missing here, but at least users are guaranteed to get a slap wh...

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101206 Bug ID: 101206 Summary: intermittent lock up after login to GNOME under wayland Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71900 Priority: medium Bug ID: 71900 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: [NV40] GPU lockup and segmentation fault of Nouveau-1.0.10 on PowerMac G5 with acceleration QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified

...s Doerfert <johannesdoerfert at gmail.com> wrote: > > This looks strange but it makes sense that you see the assertion > "because of" that patch. > > We use this code path to generate OpenMP code for a while nowthat is why > I am not convinced there is not another (undiagnosed) problem which is > the actual cause. > > Could you run it with `-debug-only='openmp-opt,openmp-ir-builder'` > please? Is it possible you merged in an old module or some user code > with OpenMP declarations? > > > Thanks, > > Johannes > > > > On...

....com> wrote: > >> This looks strange but it makes sense that you see the assertion > >> "because of" that patch. > >> > >> We use this code path to generate OpenMP code for a while nowthat is why > >> I am not convinced there is not another (undiagnosed) problem which is > >> the actual cause. > >> > >> Could you run it with `-debug-only='openmp-opt,openmp-ir-builder'` > >> please? Is it possible you merged in an old module or some user code > >> with OpenMP declarations? > >> > >...

...>>>> This looks strange but it makes sense that you see the assertion >>>> "because of" that patch. >>>> >>>> We use this code path to generate OpenMP code for a while nowthat is why >>>> I am not convinced there is not another (undiagnosed) problem which is >>>> the actual cause. >>>> >>>> Could you run it with `-debug-only='openmp-opt,openmp-ir-builder'` >>>> please? Is it possible you merged in an old module or some user code >>>> with OpenMP declarations? >>...

Hi, That patch was from an ongoing effort to consolidate OpenMP generation in clang. If memory serves the implementation there is still a little incomplete. It's supposed to use types from OMPConstants rather than ones it defined itself and the methods used to create the functions shouldn't need to be static. However attempting this caused a lot of errors so there might be an underlying

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92438 Bug ID: 92438 Summary: Segfault in pushbuf_kref when running the android emulator (qemu) on nv50 Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium