search for: undermines

Hi, I realise that the GPL license question has been discussed in 2003 and in 2007, extensively. Back then, the conclusion seem to have been that in-process usage is not possible for most use-cases and that instead, a network layer/IPC mechanism is required to use Xapian with any non-GPL software. I think the project is severely undermining its own potential success. I see that there are even

Hi everyone, I found that Clang -O0 performs optimizations that undermine dynamic bug-finding tools. First, most bug finding tools such as ASan, Valgrind, Dr. Memory, Mudflap, Purify and Safe Sulong (on which I am working) rely on detecting errors during the execution of the program. They either insert additional checks during compile-time or during run-time which are executed when the program

...tures complicating the IR. They prefer to see bitcasts and logical operators over unions and bitfields. An alternative is to introduce these features, but add a target lowering phase that strips them from the IR and replaces them with the target-dependent equivalent. The downside here is that it undermines the "single IR" LLVM approach. OTOH, it's a lot like running mem2reg before doing optimizations. Reid

Hi all, I've been trying to figure out if there is a feasible way to prevent values from ever spilling from registers to the stack. I've looked for code or documentation on how to do this but haven't found anything, apologies if this has already been done. Recent security research has shown that protection schemes such as CFI (that might otherwise be secure) are undermined by

...[dd.dd.dd.dd]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: Connection lost to authentication server Jun 3 00:23:02 xxx postfix/smtpd[14930]: lost connection after AUTH from unknown[dd.dd.dd.dd] Is there an obvious way around this? I know I could somehow merge the changes into the running sqlite db but that undermines the simplicity of the design I have. Maybe a patch to reopen the db if it's replaced? Or perhaps I should just switch to a different db format -- that's probably the quickest/easiest solution. Any other ideas? There are about 20k entries to deal with. Thanks, David

On Oct 15, 2009, at 10:45 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > Unfortunately, we found out at the last minute that Apple has a rule > which prevents its engineers from giving video taped talks or > distributing slides. We will hold onto the video and slide assets in > case this rule changes in the future. > > -Chris Chris, I hope you can pass my message along to the people at Apple

Dear shorewall users: I am going to implement VPN IPSEC pass through. Got shorewall as the main firewall interfacing the internet. I found Tom''s documentation on how to do it. The question is: there''s an argument that VPN pass through (pass through NAT) will undermine the importance of AH (source: freeswan site). Is it true? ------------------------ Lito Kusnadi

On 02/04/15 16:45, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > but still no answers can be given correctly, because of no smb.conf is posted by buhorojo. > so question post you : The thread has nothing to do with the buhorojo setup. We are trying to find why sssd-ad cannot be installed alongside sernet. The poster of the thread has a workaround, using sssd, so it's not urgent. What remains unanswered

Hello, i have a linux box which is acting as a lan router towards the internet doing traffic shaping. My link is 10Mbit/s full duplex. I have set some HTB classes with a rate of 20% (2Mbit/s) and a ceil of 95% (9.5Mbit/s). Is such an excursion of bandwidth in the HTB classes feasible for HTB to control? What Timer frequency (kernel menuconfig) is the most suitable among 250, 300 and 1000Hz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 14 May 2014, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 5/13/2014 3:02 PM, Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl> wrote: >> If you know what you are doing (think twice about that!), you can override >> this behavior using the sieve_vacation_send_from_recipient setting (if your >> Pigeonhole is recent enough): >>

Hi, I usually stay away from issues like this, basically because I'm not a lawyer (and don't want to be one), and I don't have a real interest in these issues. Quoting Tatu : > We also have a trademark pending on the Secure Shell mark This seriously undermines the IETF standard draft. It's the same as registering 'milk' as a trademark. Both Secure and Shell are common used words, so this trademark doesn't make sense to me. I personally also find it strange that this trademark issue has been playing for 6 years now, and nobody complained...

On 08/10/2017 04:41 PM, Frank-Ulrich Sommer wrote: > I can't see any security advantages of a self signed cert. I then you fail to understand the history, like when Microsoft's certs were undermined because the third party authentication agency gave the keys to 2 guys that knocked on the door and asked for them... -- So many immigrant groups have swept through our town that

...t results, set BatchMode=yes by default in ~/.ssh/config so that you will never ever ever be prompted legitimately; the connection will simply fail until you remember to ssh-add. Therefore any time you are ever prompted when ssh'ing somewhere, you are being messed with. Your patch undermines 2). If it became a standard practice to "transparently add a passphrase to the agent the first time a key is used", then people will get used to the behavior that they sometimes have to enter their passphrase when ssh'ing somewhere, and sometimes don't. That will make them more...

Personally, I am agnostic. I've just read thru Centos documentation that there is a big effort to remove all upstream personalities from Centos. Personally, I don't see why RH is doing this. I would think that it undermines RH. But I'm still new/old to all of this. It used to be the big argument was between Unix from Berkeley(4.? I think) and SysIII/V. Always always battles for turf. Clayton >-----Original Message----- >From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On >Behalf...

Hi, On 12/11/12 15:11, Meador Inge wrote: > On 11/11/2012 11:58 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > >>> Is there a particular sub-system size that makes sense to mark as owned? I have been >>> reworking the library call simplification infrastructure recently and will be happy >>> to sign up as an owner for that. >> >> I think that "directory level"

In my work with a simple localization plugin, i''m running into a lot of places in the Rails core, where text and other localization specific information is hardcoded. I''ve included some examples in the bottom of this post. It''s hard for an outsider to know, if the hardcoded values are a result of inconsistency in code, or "by design". I hope that we can have

I too am disappointed that not all talk slides are posted. To me it speaks poorly of the whole meeting since there were parallel sessions and not everyone could attend in person all the sessions they wanted to. The slides are, I thought, meant to be like the "proceedings" and If I recall some of the Apple slides are present from previous years but not this year. Vinod On Sat, Oct 17,

On 11/11/2012 11:58 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> Is there a particular sub-system size that makes sense to mark as owned? I have been >> reworking the library call simplification infrastructure recently and will be happy >> to sign up as an owner for that. > > I think that "directory level" is the right granularity. If you're interested in signing > up

Hi, I am working on a security architecture. In this architecture, the application in DomU has to communicate directly with the hypervisor. But as I can see, the xen architecture allows only DomU kernel to raise a hypercall. I am planning to enable application to communicate with xen directly. I am assuming, setting up a trap gate with Ring-3 access should do the trick. I have few questions

Received this link from a regular email blast, it may interest some of you. I guess RoR is starting to gain more traction :-) http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/db2/library/techarticle/dm-0606dumbill/?ca=dnw-723 Cheers Mohit.