search for: unaceptable

El 20 de noviembre de 2020 2:22:45 GMT-05:00, "L.P.H. van Belle" <belle at bazuin.nl> escribi?: >I suggest you read : >https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable > Hello; I read the URL sugessted. There exist a Kerberos principal; there exist the bind AD account and the files permission in /usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab are

On 18/11/2020 19:34, Rommel Rodriguez Toirac via samba wrote: > Rommel Rodriguez Toiracrommelrt at nauta.cu > On 18/11/2020 17:34, Rommel Rodriguez Toirac via samba wrote:>?? > In my network I have a samba 4.11.4 as Active Directory Domain Controller installed in CentOS 7 (gtmad.gtm.onat.gob.cu - 192.168.41.17). I have recently installed samba 4.13.2 in CentOS 8 (gtmad1.gtm.onat.gob.cu

El 18 de noviembre de 2020 15:16:09 GMT-05:00, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> escribi?: >On 18/11/2020 19:27, Rommel Rodriguez Toirac wrote: >> >> ?It is /etc/named.conf and /etc/samba/smb.conf >> >> >> # cat /etc/named.conf >> >> >> ??tkey-gssapi-keytab "/usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab"; >> >>

Hello, I created a data.frame which contains two columns: df$P (Power) et df$DateTime (time). I'd like to add a new column df$diffP (difference of Power between T and T-2). I made a loop : for (i in 3:length(df$DateTime)){ df$diffP[i] = df$P[i] - df$P[i-2] } execution time result is unaceptable: 24s !! Is there any way to reduce complexity about O(n) ? for example 2 or 3s (10s maxi) Does anybody find better than ~24s ? thanks for your help -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/data-frame-temporal-complexity-tp4269585p4269585.html Sent from the R help mailing l...

-------- Mensaje original --------> ?> In my network I have a samba 4.11.4 as Active Directory Domain Controller installed in CentOS 7 (gtmad.gtm.onat.gob.cu - 192.168.41.17). I have recently installed samba 4.13.2 in CentOS 8 (gtmad1.gtm.onat.gob.cu - 192.168.41.18) and following the wiki.samba.org guide I have joined it as a domain controller to my network.> ?> ? But I have a

On 18/11/2020 19:27, Rommel Rodriguez Toirac wrote: > > ?It is /etc/named.conf and /etc/samba/smb.conf > > > # cat /etc/named.conf > > > ??tkey-gssapi-keytab "/usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab"; > > > include "/usr/local/samba/bind-dns/named.conf"; > OK, does the /usr/local/samba/bind-dns directory exist ? if it does, is the

Rommel Rodriguez Toiracrommelrt at nauta.cu On 18/11/2020 17:34, Rommel Rodriguez Toirac via samba wrote:>?? > In my network I have a samba 4.11.4 as Active Directory Domain Controller installed in CentOS 7 (gtmad.gtm.onat.gob.cu - 192.168.41.17). I have recently installed samba 4.13.2 in CentOS 8 (gtmad1.gtm.onat.gob.cu - 192.168.41.18) and following the wiki.samba.org guide I have joined

? In my network I have a samba 4.11.4 as Active Directory Domain Controller installed in CentOS 7 (gtmad.gtm.onat.gob.cu - 192.168.41.17). I have recently installed samba 4.13.2 in CentOS 8 (gtmad1.gtm.onat.gob.cu - 192.168.41.18) and following the wiki.samba.org guide I have joined it as a domain controller to my network. ? ? But I have a "dnsupdate_nameupdate_done: Failed DNS update with

...look deeper in it. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Rommel Rodriguez Toirac [mailto:rommelrt at nauta.cu] > Verzonden: vrijdag 20 november 2020 14:35 > Aan: L.P.H. van Belle > CC: Lista samba4 > Onderwerp: RE: [Samba] dnsupdate failed with TKEY is unaceptable > > El 20 de noviembre de 2020 2:22:45 GMT-05:00, "L.P.H. van > Belle" <belle at bazuin.nl> escribi?: > >I suggest you read : > >https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_ > is_unacceptable > > > > > Hello; > I read t...

...n-convergence.I think this path is hard and uncertain, >and now,i would dive first in DirectSound to try to obtain synchronized streams before passing them to speex. Waiting for your good news. >Regarding ASIO, you have to install a special "driver"? for it to work,and this seems unaceptable for general users. >--- El jue, 22/7/10, limaoquan2000 <limaoquan2000 at 126.com> escribi: >Thank you. >But it will cost you a long time to get the accurate play and capture frequencies. >Does your program test two frequencies of the sound card each time Because >different s...

...is path is hard and uncertain, > >>and now,i would dive first in DirectSound to try to obtain synchronized streams before passing them to speex. > >Waiting for your good news. > >>Regarding ASIO, you have to install a special "driver"? for it to work,and this seems unaceptable for general users. > >>--- El jue, 22/7/10, limaoquan2000 <limaoquan2000 at 126.com> escribi: > >>Thank you. > >>But it will cost you a long time to get the accurate play and capture frequencies. >>Does your program test two frequencies of the sound card each...

Thank you. But it will cost you a long time to get the accurate play and capture frequencies. Does your program test two frequencies of the sound card each time? Because different sound cards have different frequency errors. And the resampling program is also time consuming because the target frequency is so close to the sampling frequency of the input signal, isn't it? I have tested program

...would dive first in DirectSound to try to obtain >> synchronized streams before passing them to speex. >> > >> >Waiting for your good news. >> > >> >>Regarding ASIO, you have to install a special "driver"? for it to >> work,and this seems unaceptable for general users. >> > >> >>--- El jue, 22/7/10, limaoquan2000 <limaoquan2000 at 126.com >> <mailto:limaoquan2000 at 126.com>> escribi: >> > >> >>Thank you. >> > >> >>But it will cost you a long time to get the accura...