search for: try_authtok

...DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU=amd64 instead of     DEB_HOST_ARCH=amd64. This matches samba-libs.install and adds x32   * Allow one to change password via passwd in default config     - third_party: Update pam_wrapper to version 1.0.7     - third_party: Add pam_set_items.so from pam_wrapper     - nsswitch: Add try_authtok option to pam_winbind     - tests: Check pam_winbind pw change with different options     - Patch for previous 4 commits     - debian/winbind.pam-config: Use the new try_authtok option allowing       password change while preserving current behavior with password strength       modules (Closes: #85...

...sudo. And, kerberos sets : password [success=3 default=ignore] pam_krb5.so minimum_uid=1000 <<< NOTE !!!! password [success=2 default=ignore] pam_unix.so obscure use_authtok try_first_pass sha512 password [success=1 default=ignore] pam_winbind.so try_authtok try_first_pass So only minimal UID 1000 is allowed to use kerberos auth. I hope aboves helps to fix it.. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Robert Wooden via samba > Verzonden: zondag 27 september...

On 01/04/2020 12:20, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > For that to work, you need to add the CIFS/hostname.fqdn at REALM to the host your logging in. > The COMPUTER$ should hold it. > Allow the computer to delegate the cifs service. ( or all ) Thing is, the OP is trying to use a users ticket to mount, but seems to be doing it as root, which isn't going to work, mainly because

...nd, kerberos sets : password? ? ? ? [success=3 default=ignore]? ? ? pam_krb5.so minimum_uid=1000? ? ? ? ? ? <<< NOTE !!!!? password? ? ? ? [success=2 default=ignore]? ? ? pam_unix.so obscure use_authtok try_first_pass sha512 password? ? ? ? [success=1 default=ignore]? ? ? pam_winbind.so try_authtok try_first_pass So only minimal UID 1000 is allowed to use kerberos auth. ??? ?This does not look like the content in /etc/krb5.conf? Looks more like a pam_mount config file? ??? ?So, I am not sure what your thinking process was nor what I should do?? above? is?from /etc/pam.d/common-password?...

...count [success=1 new_authtok_reqd=done default=ignore] pam_winbind.so /etc/pam.d/common-auth:auth [success=1 default=ignore] pam_winbind.so krb5_auth krb5_ccache_type=FILE cached_login try_first_pass /etc/pam.d/common-password:password [success=1 default=ignore] pam_winbind.so try_authtok try_first_pass /etc/pam.d/common-session:session optional pam_winbind.so /etc/pam.d/common-session-noninteractive:session optional pam_winbind.so root at a2samba2:~#

On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:33:59 +0100 Steffen Dettmer via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > after I setup one working Samba today, I tried to do exactly the same > in another domain. > I created a privileged debian12 container and installed samba. > I have a MS Win driven AD (3 DCs). First I had not all in upper case > in krb.conf. I learnt uppercase is

Okay, now so I don't get confused. Yes, /home/WKDOM/tuser16 does exist on the client/workstation. root at lws4:~# getent group > root:x:0: > *..snipped for brevity..* > winbindd_priv:x:129: > sshgroup:x:998:adminlinux > postfix:x:130: > ..snipped for brevity.. > There is no servers-ssh group on the C/W. (I have a server-ssh group somewhere per Louis' instructions,

...: [success=end default=ignore] pam_winbind.so krb5_auth krb5_ccache_type=FILE cached_login Account-Type: Primary Account: [success=end new_authtok_reqd=done default=ignore] pam_winbind.so Password-Type: Primary Password: [success=end default=ignore] pam_winbind.so try_authtok try_first_pass Password-Initial: [success=end default=ignore] pam_winbind.so Session-Type: Additional Session: optional pam_winbind.so " > /usr/share/pam-configs/winbind And enable/disable it with: pam-auth-update If needed, and you probely need it...

Once again, something with Samba thirty bazillion components broke. Once again, my choices for logging are "nothing" or "15 MB/s spread of ten different files, because 'client authentication failed' totally needs to be lower priority than malloc debug info". Once again, none of these messages is actually able to convey what broke, where, why. Why is it impossible for