search for: theoritically

Dear All, I am trying to generate some Pareto random variates using the inverse method. This is really straightfoward and my R function looks as below : pareto <- function(c, a, cnt=1000) { u <- runif(cnt) x <- (c / ((u ^ (1 / a)))) mean.theo <- ((c * a) / (a - 1)) mean.gen <- mean(x) cat('Pareto mean : theoritical', mean.theo, 'generated', mean.gen,

Hi i need some good documentation about htb and tbf implementation in Linux kernel 2.6 and only for Linux..thx a lot __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Personals - Better first dates. More second dates. http://personals.yahoo.com

Dear R community, I was trying to estimate density at point zero of a multivariate distribution (9 dimensions) and for this I was using a multinormal approximation and the function dmvnorm , gtools package. To have a sense of the error I tried to look the mismatch between a unidimensional version of my distribution and estimate density at point zero with function density, dmvnorm and dnorm. At

...have a theoretical question here. A 128K stream is a 128 KiloBITS (NOT kiloBYTES) per second stream; am I right? Is a 512k internet connection a 512 kiloBITS or 512 kiloBYTES connection? 128 KiloBITS = 16 KiloBYTES (8 bits = 1 byte). I am wondering if a 512k connection (upload and download) could THEORITICALLY handle 4 (512/128) or 32 (512/16) 128k streams? I am confused because I often read that to calculate the potential number of listeners with a given connection; you just divide the connection speed by the stream bit rate... is it true? In this case, how is doing SomaFM to handle 4000 listeners at 1...

Hello All (to Ocaml List & CC LLVM list) As some might probably know, the LLVM compiler http://llvm.org/ has (at least in its latest SVN snapshot) a binding for Ocaml. This means that one could code in Ocaml some stuff (eg a JIT-ing compiler) which uses (and links with) LLVM libraries. http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2007-November/011481.html

Hello, I've just a little problem using the function optim. Here is the function I want to optimize : test_function(x){(exp(-0.06751 + 0.25473*((x[1]-350)/150) + 0.04455*((x[2]-40)/20) + 0.09399*((x[3]-400)/100) - 0.17238*((x[4]-250)/50)- 0.45984*((x[5]-550)/150)-0.39508*((x[1]-350)/150)* ((x[1]-350)/150) - 0.05116*((x[2]-40)/20)* ((x[2]-40)/20) - 0.27735*((x[3]-400)/100)*((x[3]-400)/100) -

I was wondering what could be pros and cons of ztdummy vs proper timer device (i.e. X100P). I am going to set up an asterisk server in europe (to do trunking, to save bandwith) and I was wondering if it'll be OK to get it going with ztdummy. Furthermore, I have only a 1024/256kbps PPPOE DSL link and I need to squeeze 12 channels through, I was wondering which codec would be suitable

...'t think of looping over a vector in the same sense of an array. Also for me, a pointer to an 2nd vector element feels very similar to getting a pointer to a 2nd word of an 64 bit integer and less than a pointer to the 2nd element in an array. If we go toward treating the array model, theoritically one could use extract or insert for an array or we get rid of those operations, and have clients uses GEP to modify a vector element. Either of them seems wrong to me for vectors. -- Mon Ping On Oct 14, 2008, at 12:08 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Oct 14, 2008, at 11:02 AM, Duncan...

On Nov 26, 2007, at 13:27, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote: > As some might probably know, the LLVM compiler http://llvm.org/ has > (at least in its latest SVN snapshot) a binding for Ocaml. This > means that one could code in Ocaml some stuff (eg a JIT-ing > compiler) which uses (and links with) LLVM libraries. Yep! There are no bindings for the JIT (just for codegen), but it has

...bits, not >kilobytes. In this sense, calling it a 512k connection is actually wrong, >as this implies kilobytes, not kilobits. But everyone seems to do it. > > > 128 KiloBITS = 16 KiloBYTES (8 bits = 1 byte). I am wondering if a 512k > > connection (upload and download) could THEORITICALLY handle 4 (512/128) >or > > 32 (512/16) 128k streams? > >Unfortunately it's 4, not 32. > > > I am confused because I often read that to calculate the potential >number >of > > listeners with a given connection; you just divide the connection speed >by &g...

Hi All, Safari crashes everytime my ajax response is bigger than 10k, i traced it down and found out that it breaks when evalScript is being called, maining when extractScript is trying to match the regex..... is this a known bug on safari? if yes is there anyway to get around it? thanks in advance --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you

That "program" will be detected by your ISP within a day or so, determined to be a virus, and your service will get disconnected...which n turn will not help your latency or jitter at all. VoIP can tolerate a fair amount of latency; latency over about 100ms is heard as a perceptible delay resulting in a connection that appears to be half duplex. Jitter, on the other had, is the real

...essed in bits, or kilobits, not kilobytes. In this sense, calling it a 512k connection is actually wrong, as this implies kilobytes, not kilobits. But everyone seems to do it. > 128 KiloBITS = 16 KiloBYTES (8 bits = 1 byte). I am wondering if a 512k > connection (upload and download) could THEORITICALLY handle 4 (512/128) or > 32 (512/16) 128k streams? Unfortunately it's 4, not 32. > I am confused because I often read that to calculate the potential number of > listeners with a given connection; you just divide the connection speed by > the stream bit rate... is it true? In this...

> > Hi there fellow R-Users, > > > > Can anyone recommend a good book on the theory and practice > > of applying > > GARCH models. > Hello Wayne, * Campbell, John, Lo, Andrew W., MacKinlay, A. Craig, The Econometrics of Financial Markets, 1996, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. http://pup.princeton.edu/titles/5904.html * Enders, Walter,

Hi, I am facing a problem in extrapolation of data series. It is a series of Bond yields, I am having the yield for 1 year to 30 years. I want to find the yield for 0.5 year and 30.5 years. I used the Langrange's Extrapolation but the extrapolation deviates from the normal trend ( as we can see in theoritical yield curves) very sharply, as go on increasing my years from 30 years to 35 years

Hi, I tried to simulate an ARIMA model by using arima.sim(), say arima.sim(n=100,list(order=c(1,0,1),ar=0.6,ma=0.9,sd=1), but the acf and pacf of simulated data using acf() and pacf() are so much different from the theoritcal acf and pacf. For instance, in my case, ar=0.6 and ma=0.9, so the acf for all lags should be greater than 0 based on the theoritical calculation, but the acf of simulated

On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, sreenivas karanam wrote: > Hello, > Iam working on MPEG-2 AAC Decoder and in need of some basic theoritical > information regarding CHANNEL COUPLING.Can u please send me some technical > papers on this subject or web sites where i can get some information. Unfortunately, I don't have a bibliography on compression techniques. A quick search on google.com

On Oct 14, 2008, at 11:02 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Mon Ping, > >> I would like to make it illegal to GEP into a vector as I think it is >> cleaner and more consistent. Opinions? Comments? > > now that arrays are first class types, I think vectors should become > a subclass of ArrayType. This would get rid of a lot of duplicated > code, and also fix a bunch of

Dear List I am using the RandomFields package, and I have a problem when 2d-kriging, with an anisotropy, some values from an irregular network. It works well when : - 2d-kriging, without any anisotropy, some data from an irregular network - 2d-kriging, with and without anisotropy, some data from a regular network - 3d-kriging, with and without anisotropy, some data from a regular network Here is

On Nov 26, 2007, at 11:30 AM, Gordon Henriksen wrote: >> >> Of course, I do know that there are some typing issues and >> theoritical points which I deliberately ignore here. I'm supposing >> the guy wanting to LLVM for Ocaml is knowing that he seeks trouble. > > The ocaml type system is easily represented in LLVM. The only real > mismatches I'm aware of