Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "the_nam".
Did you mean:
the_name
2009 Apr 15
0
[LLVMdev] Accessing instruction/operand names
...sion.
When you see %2 in the assembly, that's an indication that the
instruction's name is empty. That is, value->getName() == "". As far
as I know, llvm-dis just generates numbers in order for un-named
instructions. When the instruction has a name (value->getName() ==
"the_name"), you get %the_name instead of the number. Does that make
sense?
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 6:20 AM, James Stanier <j.stanier at sussex.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm currently constructing a graph from LLVM bitcode, and I have a question
> about accessing t...
2006 Jul 14
1
Samba 3.0.23 winbind use default domain = yes behaviour
Hello list,
I encountered a problem in Samba 3.0.23 regarding the winbind use default
domain = yes behaviour.
It only works for the users an NOT anymore for the Group. So this make
getent group to show NETBIOSDOMAINNAME/group which course mail squid
configuration to fail. My squid configuration allowed access based on the AD
groups, which are provided by Winbindd.
Tested distribution:
SuSE
2009 Apr 15
7
[LLVMdev] Accessing instruction/operand names
Hello everyone,
I'm currently constructing a graph from LLVM bitcode, and I have a question
about accessing the names of the variables shown in the .ll assembly file,
assuming it's possible...
For example, with
%2 = load i32* %x_addr, align 4 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
I can retrieve the opcodeName() from the Instruction object, which is
"load". I can also access the operand
2009 Sep 28
0
[LLVMdev] Printing Function Arguments
Hi Nick,
Perhaps I am confused. What is the best way to extract information from
instructions ?
Is it via the, say:
for (User::op_iterator i = I->op_begin(), e = I->op_end(); i != e; ++i)
....
I am not sure what happens next, e.g. to the variable 'i', you should know
what part of the instruction this is and cast it to the necessary type.
For example, I am parsing the
2009 Sep 28
4
[LLVMdev] Printing Function Arguments
ivtm wrote:
> Hey Oscar,
>
> I want to extract information from the instruction.
>
> Think writing a simple interpreter.
>
> I already have the CallInst instance (described above in the message).
>
> Via ci->getOperand(1) say I can get the 'i32 8' parameter and I can get the
> 'i32' and '8' separately as Nick described.
>
> But I