search for: testlvs

...vsadm rules on piranha on same vip on 9004 port like below. 192.168.23.3:9004 ---->>192.168.17.16:9004 192.168.23.3:9004 ---->>192.168.17.17:9004 But i am getting below error on my syslog ################################################################################ Jul 21 20:25:38 testlvs nanny[5064]: starting LVS client monitor for 192.168.23.3:9004 Jul 21 20:25:38 testlvs nanny[5065]: starting LVS client monitor for 192.168.23.3:9004 Jul 21 20:25:43 testlvs pulse[5040]: gratuitous lvs arps finished Jul 21 20:25:47 testlvs nanny[5065]: READ from 192.168.17.16:9004 was too short Jul...

Hi list, I'm having one of those 'I'm stupid' -problems with LVM on CentOS 5.2. I've been working with traditional partitions until now, but I've finally been sold on the theoretical benefits of using LVM, but for now I only have a huge pile of broken filesystems to show for my efforts. My scenario; I attach a disk, either over USB or iSCSI. I create a PV on this

> > From: Scott Robbins <scottro11 at gmail.com> > Date: May 06, 2016 12:32:55 PM > To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] resize lvm > > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 06:19:35PM +0000, Wes James wrote: > > I have a laptop that I put centos 7 on and I started out with a 30gig partition. I resized the other part of the disk to allow

Hi all, This question is only slightly ontopic, in that the host system is a CentOS 5 box, but is otherwise a fairly generic question. I've looked in so many different places for an answer, but haven't had much luck, so I'm hoping someone here has some advice. (for the record: I posted this question to comp.os.linux.misc a few weeks ago) === I made a minor mistake recently, and

On 05/06/2016 02:15 PM, Wes James wrote: > I found this: > > # lvextend -l +100%FREE /dev/myvg/testlv > > doing a search. What's the difference between 100%VG and 100%FREE? For the special case of "100%" there is no difference. For values less than 100% with a non-empty VG, the two are quite different, e.g., (50% of VG) != (50% of the free space in VG). -- Bob

Hi 2 all ! I have problems with concurrent filesystem actions on a ocfs2 filesystem which is mounted by 2 nodes. OS=RH5ES and OCFS2=1.2.6 F.e.: If I have a LV called testlv which is mounted on /mnt on both servers and I do a "dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test.a bs=1024 count=1000000" on server 1 and do at the same time a du -hs /mnt/test.a it takes about 5 seconds for du -hs to execute: 270M