search for: test1a

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "test1a".

Did you mean: test1
2007 Aug 22
12
Virtual resource not found
...issing here. I''m trying to create a network module, used similar to the ''users'' configuration described in the Best Practices document. I have a users module which has that and it works with similar syntax to below. If I "unvirtualize" the network_interface for test1a-eth1 under the network_dmz_virt class, this works. Please help. Let me know if I need to provide more information. Node information is set up per the Best Practices, in nodes.pp and templates.pp respectively. The other manifests are in modules/network/manifests/(classes|definitions). test1a:~ $ s...
2009 Jul 24
3
Goto from a feature macro is not working?
...SWG-0085a180' jumping out of macro 'nway-start' and then the SIP line is hung up, with no further dialplan steps logged for that line. Writing a small test case to see what's going on, I get the same behavior: ; extensions.conf [macro-test1] exten => s,1,Goto(macro-test1a,s,1) [macro-test1a] exten => s,1,NoOp ; features.conf macro-test1 => *1,self/both,Macro,test1 When I activeate this feature with *1, I get: -- Executing [s at macro-test1:1] Goto("SIP/SWG-007f9280","macro-test1a|s|1") in new stack -- Goto (m...
2013 May 30
1
[LLVMdev] Expected behavior of calling bitcasted functions?
...> > Pete Is it really supposed to be undefined? The tests are checking for specific behavior in these "undefined" cases. opt -lint < test/Transforms/InstCombine/call.ll Undefined behavior: Call argument type mismatches callee parameter type call void bitcast (void (i8*)* @test1a to void (i32*)*)(i32* %A) Undefined behavior: Call argument type mismatches callee parameter type call void bitcast (void (i8)* @test2a to void (i32)*)(i32 %A) Undefined behavior: Call return type mismatches callee return type %X = call i32 bitcast (i8 ()* @test4a to i32 ()*)() Undefined be...
2013 May 30
0
[LLVMdev] Expected behavior of calling bitcasted functions?
Hello, This is an interesting example. Whenever I see strange things like this, I use opt's -lint. In this case, opt -lint reports: Undefined behavior: Call return type mismatches callee return type %call = call float @alias_f32(float %tmp2) #1 You'll get a similar report when the parameter types mismatch. Pete On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Arsenault, Matthew <
2013 May 30
3
[LLVMdev] Expected behavior of calling bitcasted functions?
Hi, I'm not sure what the expected behavior of calling a bitcasted function is. Suppose you have a case like this (which you get on the source level from attribute alias): @alias_f32 = alias bitcast (i32 (i32)* @func_i32 to float (float)*) define internal i32 @func_i32(i32 %v) noinline nounwind { entry: ret i32 %v } define void @bitcast_alias_scalar(float* noalias %source, float* noalias
2014 Nov 03
8
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Protection against stack-based memory corruption errors using SafeStack
....deep = type { %union.anon } +%union.anon = type { %struct.anon } +%struct.anon = type { %struct.anon.0 } +%struct.anon.0 = type { %union.anon.1 } +%union.anon.1 = type { [2 x i8] } +%struct.small = type { i8 } + + at .str = private unnamed_addr constant [4 x i8] c"%s\0A\00", align 1 + +; test1a: array of [16 x i8] +; no safestack attribute +; Requires no protector. +define void @test1a(i8* %a) nounwind uwtable { +entry: +; LINUX-I386: test1a: +; LINUX-I386-NOT: movl __llvm__unsafe_stack_ptr +; LINUX-I386: .cfi_endproc + +; LINUX-X64: test1a: +; LINUX-X64-NOT: movq %fs:640 +; LINUX...