search for: swo

...PTO PTO PTO PTO PTO PTO PTO PTO RBM RBM RBM RBM RBM RBM RBM [361] RBM RBM RBM RBM RBM RBM RBM RBM SKJ SKJ SKJ SKJ SKJ SKJ SKJ SKJ SKJ SKJ [379] SKJ SKJ SKJ SKJ SKJ STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STN STN STN STN STN [397] STN STN STN STN STN STN STN STN STN STN STN STN STN STN STN STN STN STN [415] SWO SWO SWO SWO SWO SWO SWO SWO SWO SWO SWO SWO SWO SWO SWO SWO TOR TOR [433] TOR TOR TOR TOR TOR TOR YFN YFN YFN YFN YFN YFN YFN YFN YFN YFN YFN YFN [451] YFN YFN YFN YFN 17 Levels: ALB ATO BIG BWS CRA MAK MOO PHC POS PTO RBM SKJ STM STN SWO ... YFN EXTRACT 2 > fish$Species != c("CRA",&...

I'm trying to update a package and would like to crush a WARNING message for a clean build. I've been struggling with this question and haven't gotten any traction on the web either. I've got a document file (Rd) that contains the following \usage statement: \name{sample.data} \alias{sample.data} \title{CONIFERS forest growth model sample data} \description{ A list object of

...or e.g. srtd::sort: > > "Requires: operator< (for the version with no arguments) or comp (for the > version with a comparison argument) defines a strict weak ordering (25.4)." > > which also sounds like UB. Exactly correct. If your comparison operator does not define a SWO, then you have no guarantees of the results. Crashes are common. In principle, I am very much in favor of a checker like this. Passing an invalid comparison operator is one of the most common misuses of std::sort. I worry about the cost, though. -- Marshall -------------- next part -------------...

...to let the target define > acceptable strings for memory scopes and a strict weak ordering over > them.... That's really complex and heavy weight, but I'm not really > confident that we're safe committing to something more limited. The > good side is that we can add the SWO-stuff lazily as needed... > > Dunno, thoughts? Just the thought of using strings in the IR smells like over-design to me. Going back to the original point, are target-independent optimizations on scoped atomic operations really so attractive? But while the topic is wide open, here's a...

...913"> #<struct Struct::ChangeNotifyStruct action="added", file_name="4913"> #<struct Struct::ChangeNotifyStruct action="added", file_name="4913"> #<struct Struct::ChangeNotifyStruct action="removed", file_name=".test.txt.swo"> Any ideas? - Dan

...one where the IR just encodes enough > data for the target to answer queries about the relationship between > scopes. I am not really championing scope layout strings over a target-implemented API, but it seems less work to me rather than more. The relationship between scopes is just an SWO, and it can be represented as a graph. A practical target will have a very small number of scopes, say not more than 16. It should be possible to encode this into a graphviz-style string. Then instead of having every target implement an API, they just have to specify the relationship as a strin...

Hi Sameer, > On Jan 5, 2015, at 4:51 AM, Sahasrabuddhe, Sameer <Sameer.Sahasrabuddhe at amd.com> wrote: > > Right. The second version of my patches fixes the bitcode encoding. But now I see another potential problem with future bitcode if we require an ordering on the scopes. What happens when a backend later introduces a new scope that goes into the middle of the order? If they

...n=0xf4606e8 "s", priority=61, label=0x0, callerid=0xf198f10 "6465956167", action=E_SPAWN) at pbx.c:1833 e = (struct ast_exten *) 0x2aaaac052cb0 app = (struct ast_app *) 0x2aaaac00aeb0 res = 1098536976 q = {incstack = {0x0 <repeats 128 times>}, stacklen = 0, status = 5, swo = 0x0, data = 0x0, foundcontext = 0xf460698 "macro-outbound"} passdata = "SIP/4612 at 10.201.2.224|35|L(1800000:120000)T", '\0' <repeats 8148 times> matching_action = 0 __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = "pbx_extension_helper" #6 0x000000000048f472 in ast_spawn_...

I've read man ssh and man ssh-keygen and some howtos and still am not getting what I expect. I can do ssh john at 192.168.15.3 and login with a password OK. I want to be able to do that with keys in preparation for running rsync with keys, so I created a key on router1, the machine I want to ssh from. routem at router1:~/.ssh$ lla total 20 drwx------ 2 routem routem 4096 2009-03-08 09:55 . drwxr-xr-x 5 routem routem 4096 2009-03-08 13:41 .. -rw...

...16d6a0, curmsg = -1, lastmsg = 0, newmessages = 0, oldmessages = 23, starting = 0, repeats = 0} vmu = (struct ast_vm_user *) 0x41751e80 vmus = {context = "admin", '\0' <repeats 74 times>, mailbox = "1369", '\0' <repeats 75 times>, password = "1234", '\0' <repeats 75 times>, fullname = "HR Temp", '\0' <repeats 72 times>, email = '\0' <repeats 79 times>, pager = '\0' <repeats 79 times>, serveremail = '\0' <repeats 79 times>, mailcmd = '\...

...249828 "my-queue", exten=0x8249878 "80", priority=7, label=0x0, callerid=0x821e5b0 "562390", action=136482640) at pbx.c:532 e = (struct ast_exten *) 0x82207a0 res = 0 q = {incstack = {0x0 <repeats 128 times>}, stacklen = 0, status = 5, swo = 0x0, data = 0x0, foundcontext = 0x8249828 "my-queue"} passdata = "my-queue|t|||300", '\0' <repeats 8173 times> matching_action = -1222567212 #5 0x080c7041 in __ast_pbx_run (c=0x82496a8) at pbx.c:2314 ---Type <return> to continue, or q &lt...

(+correct cfe-dev list) On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Yuri, > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Yury Gribov via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer currently does not check for undefined >> behaviors which result from improper usage

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking

...t;G|#&o at 3Q; z=y%Gkm`e$5NnKDurtJ4=>^mEJ-?0M0P7iofa$4u#=dpQh_)GiWHFj#C at i7sVexaLw z)1lYKuf9(Va(Je+f4L{f%ko}{s;KC|)m8P}GsiI{FA?-!ifhKjtas at YPROVZsZR`V zWt*s}pabtX4ZOs)4`>8;T9;h~AUcE0?1w)^m4x<-|9*+p9XREbM(BPj{`i-mO7}>v zpscp}DuX%EZ>-sb`L8nK;YSfd>K{pzaANfQ6b>d^;Ez1D|E<csWoYi1c{h(N!7tH7 z-!X$EnZh?ng(Qyq8O!)`Mne)xD17xEv7S7!Q9urkp at YuDb@E4wx0LouKMI at 4;wt;B z&NNfB*4!);WY%&zT~fbAEsH?A{m(5KpH#zzvZ~jS7q(vDwl;XaHHVg at V&i`?1vZSu zXrgY<BNSEjs48RVMtjhPX~$Fj;TWjEaajKy(Ez*TO6142Ih3d7#Y}Fd;S(P#N<lFL z+)<?K{;-}*;|Ok<SR7^p82Et58KyYFr6df<bAfv8?eNs4&lt...