search for: submodal

Hi, So I got a crash on the following code: k1=SUBMODE(lpc_enh_k1); k2=SUBMODE(lpc_enh_k2); which in the newer codebase is: bw_lpc(SUBMODE(lpc_enh_k1), st->interp_qlpc, awk1, st->lpcSize); bw_lpc(SUBMODE(lpc_enh_k2), st->interp_qlpc, awk2, st->lpcSize); I am not sure if the newer code will have the same issue but the following check is

> Use speex_mode_query with SPEEX_SUBMODE_BITS_PER_FRAME > You need to pass the submode number with the pointer and the number of > bits per frame is returned using the same pointer. Note that with > speex_mode_query, the first argument is the mode (e.g. &speex_nb_mode), > not the encoder/decoder state. Thank you Jean-Marc, This works well. Now a followup question. Is there

On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 05:45:06PM +0200, Ville Syrj?l? wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 04:19:27PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > > On 25.02.2020 12:21, Ville Syrj?l? wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 03:14:54PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > > >> On 19.02.2020 21:35, Ville Syrjala wrote: > > >>> From: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at

Anybody who have a working .emacs (++) for Ubuntu (or Debian) with the newest emacs-rails (v.0.3). I have especially trouble with getting HTML Mode Snippets to work. - Henrik

Hi Jean-Marc, Hi Jim, I have also seen some problems with the 1.1.8 release on the C55x. So far I have boiled down the issues to the following: 1) We need our own "fixed_xx.h" header file. I don't know why, and haven't had time to investigate, but there is a definite improvement when I use the attached fixed_c55x.h file which has turned all the maths into inline functions.

Hi list! There seem to be some oddities in using ABR. The first thing I notice is that because "abr_count" increases without bound, after a while the weight of the bitrate history will completely swamp any change in the current bitrate and the ABR adjustment will essentially stop happening. This seems to be true in any mode (not just UWB) and perhaps a solution is to cap

On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 04:19:27PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > On 25.02.2020 12:21, Ville Syrj?l? wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 03:14:54PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > >> On 19.02.2020 21:35, Ville Syrjala wrote: > >>> From: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> > >>> > >>> Get rid of mode->vrefresh and just

I would like to hear from some one who has ecb, multiple modes with ruby mode + html mode, rails mode all working together and playing well. I had ecb working with Ruby syntax highlighting. That was a no-brainer since I just had to apt-get them on my Debian Sarge box. It got a bit more comlex after I got most of the .el files in the articles http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/emacs/RubyOnRails

Testing version of Emacs Rails (http://rubyforge.org/projects/emacs-rails/) was released. If you have some suggestion or you find some bugs please inform us. Features: * Management of WEBrick/Mongrel * Display color log file * Toggle Switch between Action/View and other file (tests, helpers) automaticly or with menu * Switching to file from current line f.e. from redirect_to :controller =>

I need to shrink speex so it will fit on an embedded processor along with some other code. The chip has only 20k of ram. I have done some work with libspeex.dsp by removing references to all modes but narrow band 8000 hz (submode 3). I used the defines: FIXED_POINT, DISABLE_FLOATING_POINT_API, DISABLE_VBR. I also removed the structures for the other submodes and the functions that they called.

Hello, I do test runs of speex using speexenc -n [name].wav [name].spx The wav-files (6 different speech files) hereby are sampled at 44100Hz. Most interestingly, all Frames have SubModeID 5. I haven't tracked the Assignment of the SubModeID through the source code, so I just wanted to ask, if I can assume "speexenc -n" to use SubModeID 5 always? Ciao, Bj?rn -- You will

Hi, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >> I haven't tracked the Assignment of the SubModeID through the source >> code, so I just wanted to ask, if I can assume "speexenc -n" to use >> SubModeID 5 always? > > Only if you never change the bit-rate. But speexenc -n was a dumb idea > in the first place... I know ... Thats why I downsampled the WAV-File to 8kHz (I got

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1270 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1270.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 6637f912283e727dbb61803200b26ad1974e4ed1c254d8cb315d79be3cb052f6 redhat-lsb-4.1-27.el7.i686.rpm

Hi Jean-Marc, will you include these optimizations for minimal ram usage in the main version? Maybe if Peter sends a Patch... Thanks, Alain Jean-Marc Valin escreveu: > Sounds like you did most of what you needed to do. Using a coverage > analysis tool might help you remove bits of code here and there (e.g. > unused _ctl() cases), but the main part is done. About the preprocessor,

Hello everyone, I'm finally beginning to use Speex for a project. As expected, the implementation so far has been very easy and I am thrilled with the capabilities and flexibility of Speex, especially the new features in 1.1. My efforts so far have resulted in a couple of questions: 1) I was interested in fetching the default quality setting for narrowband:

Hi, After Bob fixed the two-address format of the ARM ldm/stm instructions, a problem remains. The load multiple instruction looks like: // A list of registers separated by comma. Used by load/store multiple. def reglist : Operand<i32> { let PrintMethod = "printRegisterList"; } def LDM : AXI4ld<(outs), (ins addrmode4:$addr, pred:$p, reglist:$dsts,

I know that most of the narrow band submodes don't have an exact multiple of eight bits in each frame 79 bits for 3.95kbps 119 bits for 5.95kbps ...etc This means that you have a few unused bits when transporting Speex in the Ogg format (you can achieve a lower number of unused bits if you change the number of frames per Ogg packet to suit the mode). However, in 8kbps mode, the number of

Hi, Is there any way to determine frame size in bits or bytes of encoded frame in WB mode for given quality? That is I need to know how many bits encoded frame will occupy in RTP packet. I see SPEEX_SUBMODE_BITS_PER_FRAME request, but it works like this only for NB mode, and for WB mode it return size of WB "subframe" (?) only. -- Regards, Alexander Chemeris. SIPez LLC. SIP VoIP, IM

Sounds like you did most of what you needed to do. Using a coverage analysis tool might help you remove bits of code here and there (e.g. unused _ctl() cases), but the main part is done. About the preprocessor, there are some of the state variables that could instead be allocated on the stack, but that's about as far as you can shrink things. Cheers, Jean-Marc Peter Ruckle a ?crit : > I

Dear R-helpers, In the case of two categorical factors, say a and b, once I have fixed the constrasts, the model matrix is set according to these contrasts with "lm", and the t-tests for the significance of the parameters provided by "summary" indeed concern the comparison of the model with each submodel obtained by removing the corresponding column of the model matrix.