Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "sub5".
Did you mean:
sub
2003 Nov 05
0
Re: [S] LME - fixed effects model and missing values
...ng measurements, so that the data
look like this:
> MAT<- structure(c(23, 24, 6, 19, 16, 20, 13, 11, NA, 8, NA, 21, 19, 15,
11, NA, 10, 12, 16, 30, 13, 16, NA, NA, NA, NA, 28, 6), .Dim = c(7, 4),
.Dimnames = list(c("SUB1", "SUB2", "SUB3", "SUB4", "SUB5", "SUB6",
"SUB7"), c("BDI0", "BDI3", "BDI6", "BDI12")))
> MAT
BDI0 BDI3 BDI6 BDI12
SUB1 23 11 11 16
SUB2 24 NA NA NA
SUB3 6 8 10 NA
SUB4 19 NA 12 NA
SUB5 16 21 16 NA
SUB6 20...
2016 Aug 23
2
How to describe the RegisterInfo?
...4)),
(add (decimate (shl gpr_b, 2), 4)),
(add (decimate (shl gpr_b, 3), 4))]>;
// simd byte use stride 2 register as stride 1 does not support useful ALU
instruction
def gpr_b_simd8 : RegisterTuples<[sub0, sub1, sub2, sub3, sub4, sub5, sub6,
sub7],
[(add (decimate gpr_b, 16)),
(add (decimate (shl gpr_b, 2), 16)),
(add (decimate (shl gpr_b, 4), 16)),
(add (decimate (shl gpr_b, 6), 16)),...
2012 Jul 16
0
[LLVMdev] !dbg metadata not generated for if.else->if.end branch
...sult, align 4, !dbg !51
%add3 = add nsw i32 %5, %sub, !dbg !51
store i32 %add3, i32* %result, align 4, !dbg !51
br label %if.end, !dbg !51
if.else: ; preds = %entry
%6 = load i8* %bar.addr, align 1, !dbg !52
%conv4 = sext i8 %6 to i32, !dbg !52
%sub5 = sub nsw i32 221, %conv4, !dbg !52
%7 = load i32* %result, align 4, !dbg !52
%add6 = add nsw i32 %7, %sub5, !dbg !52
store i32 %add6, i32* %result, align 4, !dbg !52
br label %if.end
if.end: ; preds = %if.else, %if.then
%8 = load i32* %result, a...
2009 Apr 09
2
better way of recoding factors in data frame?
...including the way missing values are represented.
Here is an example of the merged dataframe:
> myFrame2
???SubjCode SubjSex? ? ? ? ? Sex
1? ? ? sub1? ? ???M? ? ? ???<NA>
2? ? ? sub2? ? ???F? ? ? ???<NA>
3? ? ? sub3? ? ???M? ? ? ???Male
4? ? ? sub4? ? ???M? ? ? ???<NA>
5? ? ? sub5? ? ???F? ? ? ???<NA>
6? ? ? sub6? ? ???F? ? ???Female
7? ? ? sub7? ? ? ? ? ? ? ???<NA>
8? ? ? sub8? ? ? ? ? ? ? ???<NA>
9? ? ? sub9? ? ? ???Not Recorded
10? ? sub10? ? ? ???Not Recorded
I then apply the following:
> myFrame2$SubjSex <- factor(myFrame2$SubjSex, levels = c(&...
2009 Nov 27
2
using reshape to do ANOVA mixed models
Hi,
I just started with R and I found that there are many options to rearrange
the data to do mixed models.
I want to use the reshape function. I have 2 between subject variables and
one within.
I was able to change the data structure but still - the result of the aov
functions are calculating everything as a within subject.
the table looks like this:
SerialNo breed treatment distance_1
2005 Dec 22
2
strange tc filter behavior
...rface = eth2 (htb qdisc)
Internet input interface = imq0 (eth2 attached - htb qdisc)
main class = imq0 1:1
sub1 = 1:ffff (default)
sub2 = 1:10 (src ports 1433/tcp or 1434/tcp or 81/tcp or 82/tcp)
sub3 = 1:11 (src and dst port 25/tcp )
sub4 = 1:12 (src and dst ports 80/tcp or 53/any or 443/tcp)
sub5 = 1:99 (packets less than 64 bytes)
main class = eth2 2:1
sub1 = 2:ffff (default)
sub2 = 2:10 (src ports 1433/tcp or 1434/tcp or 81/tcp or 82/tcp)
sub3 = 2:11 (src and dst port 25/tcp )
sub4 = 2:12 (src and dst ports 80/tcp or 53/any or 443/tcp)
sub5 = 2:99 (packets less than 64 bytes)
I...
2007 Nov 23
0
Mutual information
...pairE subj pattern
far-near : 18 sub1 : 37 urb :123
long-short : 18 sub2 : 37 bpb : 72
supported-unsupported: 18 sub3 : 37 prp : 67
large-small : 18 sub4 : 37 brb : 64
dense-sparse : 18 sub5 : 37 unp : 62
divergent-convergent : 18 sub6 : 37 pnp : 44
(Other) :558 (Other):444 (Other):234
> dim(emPat)
[1] 666 3
I have 37 types of pairE. 18 subjects placed each of the 37 pairEsinto
one of 24 patterns (18 x 37 = 666). I would like to compute a...
2006 Nov 01
1
How to rsync only specified subdirectories in the source folder?
...ll,
For example,if there is ten subdirectories named sub1~sub10(each including
subdirectories and files too),and file1~file10,how can I rsync only sub2 and
sub 3 to the target?
/---- MyFolder
|---------- sub1
|---------- sub2
|---------- sub3
|---------- sub4
|---------- sub5
|---------- sub6
|---------- sub7
|---------- sub8
|---------- sub9
|---------- sub10
|---------- file1
|---------- file2
|---------- file3
|---------- file4
|---------- file5
|----------------------
rsync -av --delete --include "/sub2/" --include &q...
2016 Aug 23
2
How to describe the RegisterInfo?
Hi Escha,
Great to have your comment! Do you have any specific reason for not doing
like this?
I am not sure whether I understand your point correctly. For "just model
one thread",
do you mean "only considering ONE of the 8/16 working lanes that running in
lock-step way"??
For my case, may be something like I only need to define r0~r127 as
register for i32 register (each r#
2017 Jan 23
5
DNS Update not working after update to 4.5.3
...2.domain.tld'
Jan 23 15:25:25 rtd-dc1 named[4942]: samba_dlz: configured writeable zone 'sub3.domain.tld'
Jan 23 15:25:25 rtd-dc1 named[4942]: samba_dlz: configured writeable zone 'sub4.domain.tld'
Jan 23 15:25:25 rtd-dc1 named[4942]: samba_dlz: configured writeable zone 'sub5.domain.tld'
Jan 23 15:25:25 rtd-dc1 named[4942]: samba_dlz: configured writeable zone 'domain.tld'
Jan 23 15:25:25 rtd-dc1 named[4942]: samba_dlz: configured writeable zone '_msdcs.main.domain.tld'
Jan 23 15:25:25 rtd-dc1 named[4942]: set up managed keys zone for view _defaul...
2017 Jan 25
1
DNS Update not working after update to 4.5.3
...writeable
>> zone 'sub3.domain.tld'
>>>
>>> Jan 23 15:25:25 rtd-dc1 named[4942]: samba_dlz: configured writeable
>> zone 'sub4.domain.tld'
>>>
>>> Jan 23 15:25:25 rtd-dc1 named[4942]: samba_dlz: configured writeable
>> zone 'sub5.domain.tld'
>>>
>>> Jan 23 15:25:25 rtd-dc1 named[4942]: samba_dlz: configured writeable
>> zone 'domain.tld'
>>>
>>> Jan 23 15:25:25 rtd-dc1 named[4942]: samba_dlz: configured writeable
>> zone '_msdcs.main.domain.tld'
>>>...
2017 Jan 25
0
DNS Update not working after update to 4.5.3
...]: samba_dlz: configured writeable
> zone 'sub3.domain.tld'
> >
> > Jan 23 15:25:25 rtd-dc1 named[4942]: samba_dlz: configured writeable
> zone 'sub4.domain.tld'
> >
> > Jan 23 15:25:25 rtd-dc1 named[4942]: samba_dlz: configured writeable
> zone 'sub5.domain.tld'
> >
> > Jan 23 15:25:25 rtd-dc1 named[4942]: samba_dlz: configured writeable
> zone 'domain.tld'
> >
> > Jan 23 15:25:25 rtd-dc1 named[4942]: samba_dlz: configured writeable
> zone '_msdcs.main.domain.tld'
> >
> > Jan 23 15:2...
2017 Jan 20
5
DNS Update not working after update to 4.5.3
I suspect a zone overlap.
Did you add an extra zone manualy in bind?
Or something like this... You added :
Zone1.Domain.TLD and then
Domain.TLD
But then with the reverse zones.
Because this :
> Jan 20 13:58:09 samba02 named[10811]: zone 2.168.192.in-addr.arpa/NONE:
> has no NS records
Does not look likes the samba_DLZ log lines but a pure bind log line.
Review you bind config and
2013 Feb 14
1
[LLVMdev] LiveIntervals analysis problem
...%conv = zext i16 %0 to i32
%call = tail call fastcc i32 @enormlz(i16* %den)
%sub = sub nsw i32 %conv, %call
%arrayidx2 = getelementptr inbounds i16* %num, i32 1
%1 = load i16* %arrayidx2, align 2, !tbaa !5
%conv3 = zext i16 %1 to i32
%call4 = tail call fastcc i32 @enormlz(i16* %num)
%sub5 = sub nsw i32 %conv3, %call4
%incdec.ptr.i = getelementptr inbounds %struct.LDPARMS* %ldp, i32 0, i32 9, i32 1
store i16 0, i16* %arraydecay, align 2, !tbaa !5
%incdec.ptr.1.i = getelementptr inbounds %struct.LDPARMS* %ldp, i32 0, i32 9, i32 2
store i16 0, i16* %incdec.ptr.i, align 2, !tbaa...