search for: strombergers

Hi, Can anyone let me know if this is a bug? Thank you, Chandrakala ----- Original Message ----- From: "Logan Stromberg" <loganstromberg at gmail.com> To: "Chandrakala Madhira" <chandrakala.madhira at soctronics.com> Cc: opus at xiph.org Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 12:12:39 PM Subject: Re: [opus] Reg an issue with smoothing factor in VAD

I'm trying to switch to using rsync for updating a huge software library containing binaries, text files, symlinks, and so on. We've been using something homegrown which I'm not that happy with - it's a perl script that systems cp and chmod and such. The problem I'm seeing is: target computer: directories ctime-5 and ctime-5b3 are distinct directories source computer:

Hi Chandrakala, Logan, Can you confirm that the attached patch fixes the overflow problem? Koen, can you confirm the fix makes sense? Cheers, Jean-Marc On 11/27/2017 12:10 PM, Logan Stromberg wrote: > Sorry, long holiday weekend in America. > I can say with pretty high certainty that there is an overflow occurring > and it is flipping smooth_coef_Q16 to be negative when it probably

You could try using an automounter, like autofs, in combination with sshfs. It'll be slower, possibly a lot slower, but it should be more reliable over an unreliable connection. I've been using: remote -fstype=fuse,allow_other,nodev,noatime,reconnect,ServerAliveInterval=15,ServerAliveCountMax=40,uid=0,gid=0,ro,nodev,noatime :sshfs\#root at remote.host.com\:/ BTW, I'm not sure

Just for fun, I tried to reproduce such an overflow. I turned on all debug macros, assertions, and checked arithmetic and then encoded 2 hours of mixed speech/audio with these parameters: Sample rate = 48000 Channels = 1 Application = OPUS_APPLICATION_AUDIO Bitrate = 24 KB/s Force Mode = MODE_SILK_ONLY Signal Type = OPUS_SIGNAL_AUTO Complexity = 10 Frame size = 480 samples (10ms) No errors came

Is this possibly a problem with dovecot 0.99.10.9? Maybe it's been fixed in a later release? Might it be a security issue? Thanks! -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Not Zed <notzed at ximian.com> Subject: Re: [Evolution] evo confused when searching message bodies on large folders? Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 08:11:15 +0800 Size: 3444 URL:

Hmmm, looks indeed like changing the mtu helps, strange thing is that with the bigger mtu sometimes I had no problems and often TB are copied without problems. Problem is I can't test the connection that much because the connection has been established by a third party and it is just some vlan without any hops. But thanks for the link to the nfs-test that looks interesting!

Sorry, long holiday weekend in America. I can say with pretty high certainty that there is an overflow occurring and it is flipping smooth_coef_Q16 to be negative when it probably shouldn't be. I had originally thought it was only an issue where it was overflowing the 15th bit but not the 16th, which might still preserve the intended value for operations that ignore the sign bit (in cases

Hi Does Sangoma 8-port card A108 support PCIe version 2.0 ? The card is here http://www.sangoma.com/products/hardware_products/digital_voice_and_data_networking/a108.html And we want to use 3 such cards in this motherboard because it has 3 PCIe slots of version 2.0 http://www.intel.com/products/desktop/motherboards/DX58SO/DX58SO-overview.htm Is this a good idea ? Do you have any experience

Is dovecot still considered unreliable when combined with NFS? Is this true for mbox only, or Maildir as well? If dovecot Is still considered unreliable with NFS, how about having a dovecot mode that would chain into procmail for delivery, so that dovecot doesn't (necessarily) have to reinvent that wheel? Thanks!

Benjamin, Although Andrew is totally biased, Python does run well on Linux, Windows and the Mac. Python is hot! http://www.strombergers.com/python/perl_ha_ha_ha.html Rick

I configured dovecot on a Fedora Core 2 system - the version that comes with FC2. I was using it with a RHEL 3 NFS server. Dovecot would again and again get stuck trying to grab an fcntl lock, even though I specified that it should only use dotlocks in dovecot.conf. Sometimes it would segfault (leaving things locked?). Often there would be two dovecot imapd processes for the same user.

On Fri, 19 Jul 2002, Dan Stromberg wrote: > Many apologies. If we update on the nfs server, as we've intended all > along, we should have no .nfs* files. Well, here's one thing that could make them, even if they're being created only directly, not over NFS. I'm watching the directory you're syncing into. I open the file while it's still there. You delete it, and

Is there any way of increasing rsync's block transfer size for when you need to transfer data from one filesystem to another on the same disk? Using a large blocksize tends to decrease track to track seeks. If I put a large dd or something in between two tar's in such a situation, I see over double the throughput on an AIX system (1M vs 64K). Thanks. -- Dan Stromberg DCS/NACS/UCI

We've been using this version of rsync: rsync version 2.6.2 protocol version 28 Copyright (C) 1996-2004 by Andrew Tridgell and others <http://rsync.samba.org/> Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard links, symlinks, batchfiles, no IPv6, 64-bit system inums, 64-bit internal inums ...with these options: /usr/local/bin/rsync -a --stats --progress --block-size

I am running: + cd /oas + rsync -a --rsh=/usr/bin/ssh --rsync-path=/dcs/packages/gnu/bin/rsync --progress root@sherlock1.oas.uci.edu:/oas . ...and I can see that it sometimes transfers some files, however, it appears to be consistently missing this directory: /oas/projects/pers/oct2004 What might cause this? Thanks!

Is there an announcements mailing list for samba? If not, could one please be created? I want to know when new releases are made, and when security holes are found, maybe even infrequent benchmark results, but unfortunately I don't have time to keep up with this list. My mailbox has been overflowing on a weekly basis, and it's got to stop, so I really need to decrease the volume coming

Hi, I like to use rsync for backup from Desktop to my nas server. - I can setup an cron job at the server, so rsync starts on the server side to backup from my desktop to the server. But what if I shutdown my Desktop? Can rsync handle interruptions in a good way or is there a better solution? Thanks in advance, Dirk

If reducing the MTU is helping, you might look into turning on Path MTU Discovery. NFS can be fast for large transfers if you tune it. http://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~strombrg/nfs-test.html NFS is not terribly secure though - at least v2 and v3 weren't. Not sure about v4. On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 12:59 AM, Marc Roos via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Kevin, Dan,

http://cvs-mirror.mozilla.org/webtools/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=384 ------- Additional Comments From thomas+openssh at stromberg.org 2002-08-14 05:43 ------- Created an attachment (id=137) --> (http://cvs-mirror.mozilla.org/webtools/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=137&action=view) 2 line patch for SSH_SERVER variable with incoming IP & port This patch adds an SSH_SERVER variable as a